[sage-devel] Re: Sage-Combinat days in Paris, June 2013

It's looking like there's a good chance that I'll be able to come through! On Friday, September 28, 2012 11:12:05 AM UTC+3, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote: > > Dear Sage / Sage-Combinat fans, > > FPSAC (Formal Power Series and Algebraic Combinatorics) is the main > yearly international conferen

[sage-devel] Re: Matplotlib Show() on Sage command line on Mac OS X

On 11/19/12 12:31 PM, kcrisman wrote: > > It used to be the case (when you could search sagenb.org , sigh) that > there was a demo of "flot" with exactly this capability. The new Jmol > version has some of this for 3D plots, though not dynamic

Re: [sage-devel] To lazy_import or not to lazy_import

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Andrew Mathas wrote: > Are there clear-cut guidelines somewhere on when to use import and when to > use lazy_import? If it was always better to use lazy_import then I would > have thought that that all of the all.py files would have been changed so > that they use

[sage-devel] Re: Matplotlib Show() on Sage command line on Mac OS X

> > > > > > It used to be the case (when you could search sagenb.org, sigh) that > > there was a demo of "flot" with exactly this capability. The new Jmol > > version has some of this for 3D plots, though not dynamic labeling etc. > > Just looked up flot. Was the demo a standalone plotter, or

[sage-devel] Re: Illegal free in libsingular/function.pyx

For debugging, the behaviour already occurs with: sage: A. = FreeAlgebra(QQ, 2) sage: P. = A.g_algebra({y*x:-x*y}) sage: x*y if you set `MALLOC_CHECK_ 3` and use singular-malloc. So I'd be surprised if python's gc comes into play here. I think it might be a pure mismatch in refcount i

[sage-devel] Re: Combining finite/rational fields

On Nov 19, 6:22 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Perhaps the coersion system itself might be a bit confused, but > it looks like here we talk rigour for the sake of rigour, without > any benefits. One benefit is error detection and picking proper normalizations. For instance, if you create a "reducti

[sage-devel] Re: Matplotlib Show() on Sage command line on Mac OS X

On 11/19/2012 08:26 PM, Eric Verner wrote: I can plot lists using the standard Sage plot function, so I found it odd that I couldn't do the same with numpy arrays. This is #11787 ( http://trac.sagemath.org/11787 ). It has a trivial fix that is already mentioned in the description. But I think

[sage-devel] Re: illegal free in graph_generators.py

The problem at #13719 should be solved there as well. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegro

[sage-devel] Re: Matplotlib Show() on Sage command line on Mac OS X

On 11/19/2012 11:27 PM, kcrisman wrote: On Monday, November 19, 2012 10:16:23 AM UTC-5, P Purkayastha wrote: On 11/19/2012 09:27 PM, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote: > > > 2012/11/19 Eric Verner > > > If Sage could create interactive figu

[sage-devel] Re: Matplotlib Show() on Sage command line on Mac OS X

On Monday, November 19, 2012 10:16:23 AM UTC-5, P Purkayastha wrote: > > On 11/19/2012 09:27 PM, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote: > > > > > > 2012/11/19 Eric Verner eve...@gmail.com >> > > > > If Sage could create interactive figures that were similar to Matlab > > figures > > > > > >

[sage-devel] Re: illegal free in graph_generators.py

On Monday, November 19, 2012 4:06:18 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > > On Monday, November 19, 2012 4:03:21 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: >> >> >> On Saturday, November 17, 2012 9:05:11 AM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote: >>> >>> It's worth running the sage testsuite on linux with "export

[sage-devel] Re: Matplotlib Show() on Sage command line on Mac OS X

On 11/19/2012 09:27 PM, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote: 2012/11/19 Eric Verner mailto:ever...@gmail.com>> If Sage could create interactive figures that were similar to Matlab figures I don't know about Matlab figures, but with the Sage Notebook you can have interactive plots. I am pretty

[sage-devel] Re: illegal free in graph_generators.py

On Monday, November 19, 2012 4:03:21 PM UTC+1, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > > > On Saturday, November 17, 2012 9:05:11 AM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote: >> >> It's worth running the sage testsuite on linux with "export >> MALLOC_CHECK_=3" (on OSX, look up gmalloc for similar testing). It >> makes mallo

[sage-devel] Re: illegal free in graph_generators.py

On Saturday, November 17, 2012 9:05:11 AM UTC+1, Nils Bruin wrote: > > It's worth running the sage testsuite on linux with "export > MALLOC_CHECK_=3" (on OSX, look up gmalloc for similar testing). It > makes malloc a little less tolerant of misuse. It found a problem in > graph_generators.py. S

[sage-devel] Re: Combining finite/rational fields

On 2012-11-19, Nils Bruin wrote: > On Nov 18, 6:28 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> if I understand it right, if we define the minimal parent of >> elements of GF(p^k) and QQ to be GF(p^k), then we get all this for free. > > Yes, but the problem is that there is NOT a natural morphism QQ -> > GF(p^

[sage-devel] Re: Matplotlib Show() on Sage command line on Mac OS X

I had the same problem a year a go when using matplotlib from within Sage. I just look in my code and saw that I used savefig instead : #plt.show() plt.savefig('file.png') Sébastien -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to thi

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Matplotlib Show() on Sage command line on Mac OS X

2012/11/19 Eric Verner > If Sage could create interactive figures that were similar to Matlab > figures I don't know about Matlab figures, but with the Sage Notebook you can have interactive plots. -- *Andrea Lazzarotto* - http://andrealazzarotto.com* * -- You received this message because

[sage-devel] Re: Matplotlib Show() on Sage command line on Mac OS X

On Monday, November 19, 2012 1:21:28 PM UTC+7, P Purkayastha wrote: > On 11/19/2012 10:41 AM, Eric Verner wrote: > > > When I try to plot data using matplotlib from the sage command line using > > show(), nothing happens. I have done some research and tried several > > different backends to matp

[sage-devel] Re: Combining finite/rational fields

On Nov 18, 6:28 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > if I understand it right, if we define the minimal parent of > elements of GF(p^k) and QQ to be GF(p^k), then we get all this for free. Yes, but the problem is that there is NOT a natural morphism QQ -> GF(p^k); only a partial map. I don't know how muc