[sage-devel] Re: ARPACK's callbacks from Sage?: scipy.sparse.linalg.LinearOperator

2012-10-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Saturday, 20 October 2012 04:31:34 UTC+8, jason wrote: > > On 10/19/12 8:05 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, 19 October 2012 20:35:07 UTC+8, jason wrote: > > > > On 10/19/12 7:25 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > While some ARPACK functionality is available in Sage

[sage-devel] Re: ARPACK's callbacks from Sage?

2012-10-19 Thread Jason Grout
On 10/19/12 8:05 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: On Friday, 19 October 2012 20:35:07 UTC+8, jason wrote: On 10/19/12 7:25 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > While some ARPACK functionality is available in Sage from scipy (more is > implemented in scipy 0.11, than in currently available in

[sage-devel] Re: can't compile sage on Scientific Linux 5.5 (gcc 4.6.0)

2012-10-19 Thread Volker Braun
The problem is that * Sage and your system come with libppl * gcc links with ppl * the system and Sage versions of ppl conflict You can try to compile with SAGE_INSTALL_GCC=no make On Friday, October 19, 2012 6:58:31 PM UTC+1, Timo Kluck wrote: > > Dear sage-developers, > > I'm trying t

[sage-devel] can't compile sage on Scientific Linux 5.5 (gcc 4.6.0)

2012-10-19 Thread Timo Kluck
Dear sage-developers, I'm trying to compile sage on Scientific Linux 5.5. The system has gcc 4.6.0 installed, which prompts Sage to install its own spkg of the compiler because of some bugs. Unfortunately, this doesn't work. From the build log, I gather that there is a conflict because both a s

[sage-devel] Re: Sage can't find Python on ARM?

2012-10-19 Thread jaebond
I didn't have much luck trying to install the dependencies. When I tried ldd /home/ubuntu/sage/local/bin/python, it came back with Not a dynamic executable. I went ahead and did ldd and the system python and attempted to install those libraries. However, I'm not sure if I couldn't find the r

Re: [sage-devel] prun ticket not merged even though release notes say it has

2012-10-19 Thread kcrisman
On Friday, October 19, 2012 10:56:46 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > > On Friday, 19 October 2012 17:32:12 UTC+8, Timo Kluck wrote: >> >> >> Op vrijdag 19 oktober 2012 01:30:07 UTC+2 schreef Dima Pasechnik het >> volgende: >>> >>> On Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:01:51 UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer

Re: [sage-devel] prun ticket not merged even though release notes say it has

2012-10-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, 19 October 2012 17:32:12 UTC+8, Timo Kluck wrote: > > > Op vrijdag 19 oktober 2012 01:30:07 UTC+2 schreef Dima Pasechnik het > volgende: >> >> On Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:01:51 UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >>> >>> On 2012-10-18 11:20, Timo Kluck wrote: >>> > This ticket [1] adds

[sage-devel] Re: ARPACK's callbacks from Sage?

2012-10-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Friday, 19 October 2012 20:35:07 UTC+8, jason wrote: > > On 10/19/12 7:25 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > While some ARPACK functionality is available in Sage from scipy (more is > > implemented in scipy 0.11, than in currently available in Sage scipy > > 0.9, but this is taken care of in #1

[sage-devel] Re: ARPACK's callbacks from Sage?

2012-10-19 Thread Jason Grout
On 10/19/12 7:25 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: While some ARPACK functionality is available in Sage from scipy (more is implemented in scipy 0.11, than in currently available in Sage scipy 0.9, but this is taken care of in #13541, which I'm reviewing presently), the functionality allowing to impleme

[sage-devel] ARPACK's callbacks from Sage?

2012-10-19 Thread Dima Pasechnik
While some ARPACK functionality is available in Sage from scipy (more is implemented in scipy 0.11, than in currently available in Sage scipy 0.9, but this is taken care of in #13541, which I'm reviewing presently), the functionality allowing to implement matrices as callback functions (sometim

[sage-devel] Re: Update Sage Live CD (with sage version 5.3)

2012-10-19 Thread kcrisman
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 1:07:29 PM UTC-4, Emil Widmann wrote: > > Hi, > I updated the Sage Live CD. It has now Sage version 5.3. I also worked on > the functionality, new additional features: > > - full html docs for en, de, fr, ru and tr > - smaller size, its again below 600 MB (stripped

[sage-devel] Polynomials over QQbar and AA

2012-10-19 Thread mmarco
The rings QQbar and AA are awesome for a lot of reasons, but they don't have a singular counterpart. So it means that all the functionality of polynomials over those rings, that relies on singular, is broken. We can't compute resultants, discriminants, primary decomposition and so on. We just have

Re: [sage-devel] am using ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS version...which version of sage is compatible? pls help...

2012-10-19 Thread David Joyner
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Prasun wrote: > am using ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS version...which version of sage is compatible? > pls help... 64 bit binaries are here: http://mirror.clibre.uqam.ca/sage/linux/64bit/index.html 32 bit binaries are here: http://mirror.clibre.uqam.ca/sage/linux/32bit/ind

[sage-devel] am using ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS version...which version of sage is compatible? pls help...

2012-10-19 Thread Prasun
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/g

Re: [sage-devel] prun ticket not merged even though release notes say it has

2012-10-19 Thread Timo Kluck
Op vrijdag 19 oktober 2012 01:30:07 UTC+2 schreef Dima Pasechnik het volgende: > > On Thursday, 18 October 2012 20:01:51 UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> On 2012-10-18 11:20, Timo Kluck wrote: >> > This ticket [1] adds a %prun directive for profiling to the notebook. >> > The release notes fo