I just submitted a pull request [1] that does some sanitizing for public
worksheets. I applied this to demo.sagenb.org and temporarily
re-enabled published worksheets there. Can people test this to see if
it prevents bad content from making it through in published worksheets?
I suppose we st
I've implemented some sanitizing of public worksheets [1] and applied it
to demo.sagenb.org as a test. The concerns from before were that
javascript was executing on the page, leading to malware being on the page.
Can people test the new html sanitizing being done on demo.sagenb.org?
If it lo
On 10/4/12 7:49 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 5:50:25 PM UTC-4, jason wrote:
(apologies for possible multiple posts--I've sent this twice to gmane
and it hasn't appeared)
I've implemented some sanitizing of public worksheets [1] and
applied it
to demo.sa
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 5:50:25 PM UTC-4, jason wrote:
>
> (apologies for possible multiple posts--I've sent this twice to gmane
> and it hasn't appeared)
>
> I've implemented some sanitizing of public worksheets [1] and applied it
> to demo.sagenb.org as a test. The concerns from before
(apologies for possible multiple posts--I've sent this twice to gmane
and it hasn't appeared)
I've implemented some sanitizing of public worksheets [1] and applied it
to demo.sagenb.org as a test. The concerns from before were that
javascript was executing on the page, leading to malware bein
Philipp,
The ticket already has some comments from Martin -- it needs doctests, etc.
When I looked at the code, I found the documentation about the various
substitution strategies. The docstrings should list the strategies
and give an explanation for how they work.
Regards,
Tom
On Thu, Oct
Hi everybody,
I've got a proposal for a new anf2cnf converter supporting various
substitution strategies. As I'm pretty new to SAGE, Martin Albrecht did me
a favour and already opened a ticket. Below you find the ticket needing
review please:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1355
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 1:36:27 PM UTC-4, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, October 4, 2012 7:33:02 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>>
>>
>> Well, you're not on XP, right? That seems like the right analysis,
>>> though.
>>>
>>> Yup, but I got a bunch of such errors, so still
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 7:33:02 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
> Well, you're not on XP, right? That seems like the right analysis, though.
>>
>> Yup, but I got a bunch of such errors, so still strange I did not get
> that particular one.
> Or maybe the cvxopt spkg was updated in b
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 7:15:21 PM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, October 4, 2012 12:52:56 PM UTC-4, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, October 4, 2012 6:07:27 PM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Should we continue this conversation in a new thread, or
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 12:52:56 PM UTC-4, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, October 4, 2012 6:07:27 PM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Should we continue this conversation in a new thread, or on
>> sage-windows?
>>
>> For now I'll leave it on sage-devel... though this
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 6:07:27 PM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Should we continue this conversation in a new thread, or on
> sage-windows?
>
> For now I'll leave it on sage-devel... though this is mainly for JP
> and/or Dima.
>
> I couldn't get cvxopt to build - Volker's new pack
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:24 AM, David Loeffler
wrote:
> On 4 October 2012 00:57, Maarten Derickx wrote:
>> The reason is that q_expansion_basis returns power series and not modular
>> forms:
>
> Yes, I know, but in practice one often wants to know if a given power
> series is the q-expansion of a
On 4 October 2012 16:35, Volker Braun wrote:
> You are trying to import the html-formatted patch. The correct url would be
>
> sage -hg import
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/10508/trac_10508_doctest.patch
>
> Note the /raw-attachment/ instead of /attachment/ in the url.
>
> Should we continue this conversation in a new thread, or on sage-windows?
For now I'll leave it on sage-devel... though this is mainly for JP
and/or Dima.
I couldn't get cvxopt to build - Volker's new package, unsurprisingly,
gave the same results. The log is at
http://sage.math.washington
You are trying to import the html-formatted patch. The correct url would be
sage -hg import
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/raw-attachment/ticket/10508/trac_10508_doctest.patch
Note the /raw-attachment/ instead of /attachment/ in the url.
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 3:13:58 PM UTC+1, John
Progress report: the build finished fine. Sage runs.
Next I started to apply the other two patches on #10508. Since I
don't have a working hg I used sage -hg but:
masgaj@host-56-160%pwd
/home/masgaj/local/sage-5.4.rc0/devel/sage
masgaj@host-56-160%../../sage -hg import
http://trac.sagemath.org
On 4 October 2012 12:59, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-10-04 13:41, John Cremona wrote:
>> 2. I downloaded the new atlas and cvxopt spkgs from that ticket to
>> SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard
> Good.
>
>> 3. Before starting to build, I see that tehre are two patches to be
>> applied.
> Not sure where y
On 2012-10-04 13:41, John Cremona wrote:
> 2. I downloaded the new atlas and cvxopt spkgs from that ticket to
> SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard
Good.
> 3. Before starting to build, I see that tehre are two patches to be
> applied.
Not sure where you get the number "two" from, I assume you meant either
"on
On 4 October 2012 12:01, Volker Braun wrote:
> I think its a known issue that the old ATLAS won't work with the newest
> CPUs. Can you try the new ATLAS spkg:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/10508
>
To check I am doing the right thing:
1. #10508 had various dependencies now merged in 5.4 so I switc
On 4 October 2012 12:01, Volker Braun wrote:
> I think its a known issue that the old ATLAS won't work with the newest
> CPUs. Can you try the new ATLAS spkg:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/10508
OK, I will do.
For the record:
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 4
I think its a known issue that the old ATLAS won't work with the newest
CPUs. Can you try the new ATLAS spkg:
http://trac.sagemath.org/10508
On Thursday, October 4, 2012 11:51:52 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
> I tried to build sage-5.3 on the new desktop my department has just
> supplied m
I tried to build sage-5.3 on the new desktop my department has just
supplied me with (on which I do not have root access), and atlas
failed to configure.
uname -a
Linux host-56-160 3.0.38-0.5-default #1 SMP Fri Aug 3 09:02:17 UTC
2012 (358029e) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
gcc -v
Using built-in
On 4 October 2012 00:57, Maarten Derickx wrote:
> The reason is that q_expansion_basis returns power series and not modular
> forms:
Yes, I know, but in practice one often wants to know if a given power
series is the q-expansion of an element of the space, and it seems
strange to me that you can
24 matches
Mail list logo
