[sage-devel] Re: Normalization of a vector

2012-09-22 Thread Jason Grout
On 9/22/12 4:31 AM, Volker Braun wrote: 1) deprecate normalize() and point to normalization() and normal_form() 2) normalization() is division by L2-norm 3) normal_form() is the old normalize() How about normalized() instead of normalization(). That is more like the sorted builtin that is the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Normalization of a vector

2012-09-22 Thread kcrisman
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 5:31:01 AM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > On Saturday, September 22, 2012 10:16:30 AM UTC+1, Charles Bouillaguet > wrote: > >> Isn't v.norm() supposed to denote the… norm of v ? > > > Good point, I knew that at one point ;-) > > So I'm actually proposing: > > 1)

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Can't compile Sage-5.3 on OpenSuse 12.2

2012-09-22 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-09-22 15:43, Aleksey Rukhlenko wrote: > Thanks a lot, this helped! > > P.S. Indeed there may be a gcc 4.7.1 bug. I also failed compile > OpenFOAM-1.6-ext and med-3.0.5 by native OpenSUSE compiler. What does the following output: $ gcc -v -- You received this message because you are subs

[sage-devel] Re: patchbot down?

2012-09-22 Thread Frédéric Chapoton
I am missing the patchbot, too.. Can we hope for its return soon ? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr

[sage-devel] patchbot down?

2012-09-22 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Is patchbot down? E.g. http://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/13211/ says Service Temporarily Unavailable The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. -- Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/

[sage-devel] Re: Can't compile Sage-5.3 on OpenSuse 12.2

2012-09-22 Thread Aleksey Rukhlenko
Thanks a lot, this helped! P.S. Indeed there may be a gcc 4.7.1 bug. I also failed compile OpenFOAM-1.6-ext and med-3.0.5 by native OpenSUSE compiler. On Friday, September 21, 2012 7:35:08 PM UTC+4, Volker Braun wrote: > > Hmm looks like brain damage in Suse's gcc / toolchain. Can you try > bui

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE... other GUI than notebook

2012-09-22 Thread Volker Braun
The Sage virtual appliance compiles Sage from source when creating the VM, so it has everything necessary to develop Sage. There is a version for the newest Sage release at http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/sage-5.3.ova but we are currently not distributing it because auto-login is broken in

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE... other GUI than notebook

2012-09-22 Thread P Purkayastha
Not so sure if the virtualbox sage has got all the sources. IIRC, the virtualbox sage is also stuck at 5.1 for various reasons. I am not sure if the virtualbox Linux installation has an environment set up for development. Probably vbraun can give some insight into that. This is important becaus

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE... other GUI than notebook

2012-09-22 Thread alxy
But is it possible to install this on my virtualbox-SAGE? Have no experience with linux things :P -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, sen

[sage-devel] Re: SAGE... other GUI than notebook

2012-09-22 Thread P Purkayastha
There is a new ui being written. Feel free to join in :) See https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/pull/93 On Saturday, September 22, 2012 6:12:48 PM UTC+8, alxy wrote: > > Hello, > > just installed SAGE on VirutalBox for Windows. Everything works fine, but > i dont like the notebook, especially th

[sage-devel] SAGE... other GUI than notebook

2012-09-22 Thread alxy
Hello, just installed SAGE on VirutalBox for Windows. Everything works fine, but i dont like the notebook, especially the graphs are not very felxible or scalable. As I did not find any alternative GUI, I decided to try to write my own, but I don´t know how to start. I have some skills in PHP-p

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Normalization of a vector

2012-09-22 Thread Volker Braun
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 10:16:30 AM UTC+1, Charles Bouillaguet wrote: > Isn't v.norm() supposed to denote the… norm of v ? Good point, I knew that at one point ;-) So I'm actually proposing: 1) deprecate normalize() and point to normalization() and normal_form() 2) normalization() is

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Normalization of a vector

2012-09-22 Thread Charles Bouillaguet
On Sep 22, 2012, at 11:12 AM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Saturday, September 22, 2012 2:11:08 AM UTC+1, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > normal_form() is good, and to be standard with the other code packages I've > seen, dividing by the L2-norm should be normalize(). > > As Robert pointed out, normalize

[sage-devel] Re: Normalization of a vector

2012-09-22 Thread Volker Braun
On Saturday, September 22, 2012 2:11:08 AM UTC+1, Travis Scrimshaw wrote: > normal_form() is good, and to be standard with the other code packages > I've seen, dividing by the L2-norm should be normalize(). As Robert pointed out, normalize() is bad because the name implies that the vector is m