Am Samstag, 28. Juli 2012 12:36:38 UTC+2 schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
> On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
>
>
> 2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik
>
>
> A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that
> works on
> 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 a
Nils Bruin writes:
> On Jul 27, 8:45 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>> To format a "patch", log into github, go to the
>> file:https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/blob/master/sagenb/notebook/intera...
>>
>> Click on "edit in the upper right of the file listing
>>
>> Make the change in the browser editor,
On Friday, July 27, 2012 12:25:01 PM UTC-7, MartinX wrote:
>
> I have had a go at implementing trac #3401, symbolic Li, and would like to
> override the behaviour of integrate(), but I can't see how to do it. We
> have the _derivative_ method in BuiltinFunction to define the derivative
> o
On Jul 27, 8:45 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> To format a "patch", log into github, go to the
> file:https://github.com/sagemath/sagenb/blob/master/sagenb/notebook/intera...
>
> Click on "edit in the upper right of the file listing
>
> Make the change in the browser editor, then click "Submit pull req
On 28 Jul., 15:35, Charles Bouillaguet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/28/2012 03:33 PM, leif wrote:
>
> > Frankly speaking I'm somewhat surprised that you *expect* that
> > optional GMP spkg to work (with newer versions of Sage) -- it's
> > completely outdated, and AFAIK many spkgs meanwhile won't work wi
Hi,
On 07/28/2012 03:33 PM, leif wrote:
Frankly speaking I'm somewhat surprised that you *expect* that
optional GMP spkg to work (with newer versions of Sage) -- it's
completely outdated, and AFAIK many spkgs meanwhile won't work with
that very old version anyway.
In fact, I just assumed that
On 26 Jul., 22:51, charles Bouillaguet
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am experiencing an annoying compilation failure under ubuntu 12.04, 64-bits.
>
> sage -f gmp produces this :
>
> Making all in cxx
> make[2]: entrant dans le répertoire «
> /home/charles/sage-5.2.rc1/spkg/build/gmp-4.2.1.p10/src/cxx »
>
On Saturday, 28 July 2012 18:07:29 UTC+8, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
>
>
>
> 2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik
>
>> A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that
>> works on
>> 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 and x86_64) systems.
>>
>
> IIRC universal binaries should also includ
2012/7/28 Dima Pasechnik
> A workaround is to not to build "universal" libraries, i.. anything that
> works on
> 32 as well as on 64 bit (i.e x86 and x86_64) systems.
>
IIRC universal binaries should also include PPC. Am I right?
--
*Andrea Lazzarotto* - http://andrealazzarotto.com*
*
--
--
On Saturday, 28 July 2012 15:52:19 UTC+8, kfiz wrote:
>
> System Software Overview shows '64-bit Kernel and Extensions: Yes'.
> As I said I used to run it with 32-bit but I changed that with a keyboard
> combination. In contrast to the other guys from the link you posted I've
> successfully in
10 matches
Mail list logo
