On Thursday, 26 July 2012 01:43:56 UTC+8, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> So the sage spkg built successfully, but there are other packaes left.
> Gap fails with:
> Error creating dummy 'gap.exe' and/or a link from 'gap' to it.
> during configuration.
>
> maybe the hack from
http://trac.sagemath.or
On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 12:28:17 PM UTC-7, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> I assume you've seen this before?
>>
>>
>> http://www.molto-project.eu/story/simple-dialog-system-sage-natural-language
>>
>
Actually I had not seen the recent work there.
>
>> It seems like their goal is, long-te
Thanks a lot. I reinstalled from scratch and it worked.
Le mardi 24 juillet 2012 10:31:42 UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit :
>
> This is because the error in building GCC sort of messed up the whole
> build. Either reinstall from scratch, or reinstall MPIR using:
>
> $ ./sage -f mpir
>
--
--
T
So the sage spkg built successfully, but there are other packaes left.
Gap fails with:
Error creating dummy 'gap.exe' and/or a link from 'gap' to it.
during configuration.
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:31:13 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
>
> Ok, I solved the (last?) problem with gen_interpret
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 1:03:24 PM UTC-4, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:46 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> > I don't know who would be for - Harald? Minh? - but I just noticed that
> > changelog.txt (the very valuable list of all tickets, almost) at
> > http://www.sagemath.org/m
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 2:46 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> I don't know who would be for - Harald? Minh? - but I just noticed that
> changelog.txt (the very valuable list of all tickets, almost) at
> http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/src/changelog.txt has a full duplication of
> Sage 4.7 stuff.
It's fixed
I don't know who would be for - Harald? Minh? - but I just noticed that
changelog.txt (the very valuable list of all tickets, almost)
at http://www.sagemath.org/mirror/src/changelog.txt has a full duplication
of Sage 4.7 stuff. Probably pretty easy to fix. Thanks in advance, and
for updatin
Ok, I solved the (last?) problem with gen_interpreter.py.
It seems that there are incorrect __imp_ prefix added to the symbols of the
interp_* functions when wrapper_*.o is built.
Because of that, the functions are looked to be imported from some .dll
rather .o file.
Indeed, building an independe
On 7/25/12 8:30 AM, Andrea Lazzarotto wrote:
Anyway, IMHO a Nintendo DS will never be able to perform Sage
computations, but it may be nice to implement the web interface. :)
Yes, but apparently there is a python for Nintendo DS. I think it is
still an interesting question whether sympy might
If you Google my name in the Italian version of Google, you will surely
find some news about a guy with my name who has been murdered in 2007.
Anyway, IMHO a Nintendo DS will never be able to perform Sage computations,
but it may be nice to implement the web interface. :)
--
*Andrea Lazzarotto*
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 4:46:38 AM UTC-4, Javier López Peña wrote:
>
> You think you have it bad? Look at who the other Javier López Peña is:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Javier_L%C3%B3pez_Pe%C3%B1a
>
> when this guy hit the news I received hate mail on a daily basis for
> almo
On 2012-07-25 09:10, David Loeffler wrote:
> The hard question is to compute a defining
> polynomial for the splitting field of f, identify all the roots of f
> as elements of that field, and determine each element of the Galois
> group in terms of how it acts on a single generator of the splitting
On 25 July 2012 10:30, Javier López Peña wrote:
> There is a (sort of new) fast probabilistic algorithm for computing Galois
> groups, due to Nikolai Durov:
Which sense of "computing" are we using here? (Cf. my previous email
in this thread and Nils' response.)
Regards, David
--
--
To post to
There is a (sort of new) fast probabilistic algorithm for computing Galois
groups, due to Nikolai Durov:
-
N. V. Durov, Computation of the Galois group of a polynomial with
rational coefficients. I. (Russian) Zap. Nauchn. Sem. S.-Peterburg. Otdel.
Mat. Inst. Steklov. (POMI) 31
You think you have it bad? Look at who the other Javier López Peña is:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Javier_L%C3%B3pez_Pe%C3%B1a
when this guy hit the news I received hate mail on a daily basis for almost
a year :-/
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 9:31:29 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>
>
On 25 July 2012 01:24, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Julien Puydt
> wrote:
>> Le 24/07/2012 21:28, William Stein a écrit :
>>
>>> I googled the original poster ("Kevin Smith") and found this:
>>>
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Smith
>>>
>>> It seems that he
On Jul 25, 12:10 am, David Loeffler
wrote:
> The hard question is to compute a defining
> polynomial for the splitting field of f, identify all the roots of f
> as elements of that field, and determine each element of the Galois
> group in terms of how it acts on a single generator of the splittin
Hi!
On 2012-07-25, David Loeffler wrote:
> On 25 July 2012 00:30, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> At some point in the past when William gave his Bordeaux lectures,
> Sage could only do the former (by wrapping the corresponding PARI
> command), which has the advantage of being very quick. Subsequently
On 25 July 2012 00:30, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> While looking through Stein's "Three Lectures" paper, I tried the examples
> in \S 2.1.1. In particular, the last item, computing the order of the cubic
> field's Galois group (72) seems to be straightforward when looking at the
> paper. When I tr
19 matches
Mail list logo
