On Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:10:35 PM UTC-7, Dan Drake wrote:
> Does this exist? Does it exist for git?
>
> I couldn't resist. It exists now. See attached (remove .txt extension).
Usage:
blamer
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:10:35 PM UTC-7, Dan Drake wrote:
>
> Just a thought: it would be nice if we could somehow get "hg blame" to
> annotate the file using Sage versions. Knowing that the line was changed
> in changeset 17129 is useful, but what I *really* wanted to know was the
> first
Hi everyone,
We'd like to announce a beta of the new version of the Sage cell server.
We've set it up at:
aleph2.sagemath.org
It uses websockets (via SockJS, so it falls back to older techniques if
the browser doesn't support websockets) and has been pretty much
completely rewritten to use
see inline!
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> This is most likely a bug in GCC.
> Could you try to install the package
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/gcc-4.7.1.spkg
> and compile again?
>
> This is to check whether using vanilla gcc-4.7.1 (as opposed
2012/7/19 Jeroen Demeyer :
> This is most likely a bug in GCC.
> Could you try to install the package
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/gcc-4.7.1.spkg
> and compile again?
>
> This is to check whether using vanilla gcc-4.7.1 (as opposed to
> Debian's) works.
A possible patch
ok, thanks. I'll see what the md5 result is.
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: ht
Ben Hutz writes:
> Yes, is was the mail program that wrapped those lines. The whole
> patch is quite long, so I think a link to it is better
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13130
No error here when I try to apply the patch (as expected).
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.f
Yes, is was the mail program that wrapped those lines. The whole patch is
quite long, so I think a link to it is better
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13130
As it is only this one machine that seems to be giving this error, the md5
idea is a good suggestion.
--
--
To post to this
Dima Pasechnik writes:
> On Friday, 20 July 2012 19:24:26 UTC+8, Ben Hutz wrote:
>
> It was created with hg export. I just copied out the portion for
> the relevant file to post (the whole patch is on trac #13120). I
> thought from Volker's comment that the "diff ..." was the
> met
On Friday, 20 July 2012 19:24:26 UTC+8, Ben Hutz wrote:
>
> It was created with hg export. I just copied out the portion for the
> relevant file to post (the whole patch is on trac #13120). I thought from
> Volker's comment that the "diff ..." was the metadata. Based on your
> comment, that s
It was created with hg export. I just copied out the portion for the
relevant file to post (the whole patch is on trac #13120). I thought from
Volker's comment that the "diff ..." was the metadata. Based on your
comment, that seems to not be the case. What portion of the patch is the
"metadata
On Thursday, 19 July 2012 22:27:32 UTC+8, Ben Hutz wrote:
>
> I don't think I'm copying or moving the file. Below is the info from the
> .patch file for ell_point.py. Also, there is only one machine that is
> getting this error.
>
> diff --git a/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_point.py
> b/s
Jeroen Demeyer writes:
> On 2012-07-19 21:10, Dan Drake wrote:
>> Just a thought: it would be nice if we could somehow get "hg blame" to
>> annotate the file using Sage versions. Knowing that the line was changed
>> in changeset 17129 is useful, but what I *really* wanted to know was the
>> first
Hi Jean-Pierre,
On Thu, 19 Jul 2012 06:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> I'll do when I'm finished, for the moment, I'll just keep track of
> the progress on the wiki page.
> Hopefully there is only one problematic file left: expression.pyx.
> I've looked into this all night long but
On Thursday, 19 July 2012 19:33:48 UTC+8, Javier López Peña wrote:
>
> On Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:52:26 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> let me nitpick first by saying that in group theory
>> "presentation" means "presentation by generators and
>> relations" whereas you mean a (linear) "r
15 matches
Mail list logo
