Hello,
I don't know if this is the right place for this question, but all other
discussion do focus more on mathematical issues rather than on python
issues.
I have my own implementation of a lattice class, which is able to perform
the closest point search on a vector. In addition it can do th
On 2012-07-20 07:27, P Purkayastha wrote:
> You do add statements like "Added tag ". That string can be
> searched for in the hg log.
Yes, but those don't show up when looking at the log of a specific file:
$ hg log sage/foo/bar.py
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@google
On Friday, July 20, 2012 3:13:44 AM UTC+8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2012-07-19 21:10, Dan Drake wrote:
> > Just a thought: it would be nice if we could somehow get "hg blame" to
> > annotate the file using Sage versions. Knowing that the line was changed
> > in changeset 17129 is useful, b
On 2012-07-19 21:10, Dan Drake wrote:
> Just a thought: it would be nice if we could somehow get "hg blame" to
> annotate the file using Sage versions. Knowing that the line was changed
> in changeset 17129 is useful, but what I *really* wanted to know was the
> first released version of Sage (incl
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 8:47:20 AM UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> If nobody needs it before I will probably write the patch when I am back
> from traveling, something around mid september. Cool, Cool, Cool ! :-)
>
>
Dear Nathan,
It'd sure be great to have automorphism groups of gr
Thanks everyone for your helpful posts, which came in overnight.
We have the classical groups (GL, SL,...) from GAP as groups of matrices
(in a natural way) and we have the projective versions (PGL, PSL,...) from
GAP as permutation groups. Testing indicates you cannot switch it around
(project
Just a thought: it would be nice if we could somehow get "hg blame" to
annotate the file using Sage versions. Knowing that the line was changed
in changeset 17129 is useful, but what I *really* wanted to know was the
first released version of Sage (including alphas, beta, release
candidates) includ
This is most likely a bug in GCC.
Could you try to install the package
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/spkg/gcc-4.7.1.spkg
and compile again?
This is to check whether using vanilla gcc-4.7.1 (as opposed to
Debian's) works.
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> Hi sage-devel,
>
> Using sage-5.0, it appears that (-1 % 2) gets different values if it is in a
> python file (=1), in a attached cython file (=1) or in a cython file in the
> sage tree (= -1) !
>
> Add the following three lines to sage/co
Followup: hetre are the relevant PARI diff-files:
linear-dyn.dif:
*** ../src/test/64/linear 2012-02-11 06:57:38.0 -0300
--- gp.out 2012-07-18 20:21:43.0 -0400
***
*** 685,696
? vecsort(vector(17,x,5*x%17))
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12,
Hi sage-devel,
Using sage-5.0, it appears that (-1 % 2) gets different values if it is in
a python file (=1), in a attached cython file (=1) or in a cython file in
the sage tree (= -1) !
Add the following three lines to sage/combinat/partition.py :
+aaa = -1
+tmp = aaa % 2
+print "In sage/comb
Hello!
I definedexport SAGE_CHECK="yes"
and then typed make. result:
.
.
.
real104m51.462s
user132m19.104s
sys 5m54.034s
Error building Sage.
Problem wher PARI. following is that logfile:
--
Nathann Cohen writes:
>> Wasn't this supposed to be implemented by trac #10335?
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10335
>
> Ahem :-P
>
> Then it's just that Graph.automorphism_group does not know it. And it
> is trivial to update it then. Nice !! And thanks for the
> tip !!
> Wasn't this supposed to be implemented by trac #10335?
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10335
Ahem :-P
Then it's just that Graph.automorphism_group does not know it. And it is
trivial to update it then. Nice !! And thanks for the tip !!
If nobody needs it before I will p
Nathann Cohen writes:
> (and if I may interrupt, we also really need to be able to deal with
> permutation groups on something *different* from 1...n, which is
> GAP's choice.
> And I know that I am the first one to complain about labels instead
> of integers when it comes to a graph's vertices.
>
I don't think I'm copying or moving the file. Below is the info from the
.patch file for ell_point.py. Also, there is only one machine that is
getting this error.
diff --git a/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_point.py
b/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_point.py
--- a/sage/schemes/elliptic_curv
Your patch wants to copy or move sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_point.py
but can't for some reason. Does the source exist and is the destination
writeable?
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 8:30:27 AM UTC-4, Ben Hutz wrote:
>
> I have someone testing one of my patches and
>
> hg qpush -v
>
> retur
I'll do when I'm finished, for the moment, I'll just keep track of the
progress on the wiki page.
Hopefully there is only one problematic file left: expression.pyx.
I've looked into this all night long but failed to solve the problem.
g++ complains about a template instantiation (parse error, bla
(and if I may interrupt, we also really need to be able to deal with
permutation groups on something *different* from 1...n, which is GAP's
choice.
And I know that I am the first one to complain about labels instead of
integers when it comes to a graph's vertices.
And I know that it is a nightma
I have someone testing one of my patches and
hg qpush -v
returned the error
failed to synchronize metadata for "sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/ell_point.py"
I have no idea what might cause this and couldn't find any old topics about
it. What might cause a failure like this and/or how could I
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 9:52:26 AM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> let me nitpick first by saying that in group theory
> "presentation" means "presentation by generators and
> relations" whereas you mean a (linear) "representation".
>
Fine, maybe I should have use "realization" or "imploement
Le 19/07/2012 11:17, Simon King a écrit :
Hi!
On 2012-07-19, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
let me nitpick first by saying that in group theory=20
"presentation" means "presentation by generators and
relations" whereas you mean a (linear) "representation".
In this way of thinking, the most compact way
Hi!
On 2012-07-19, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> let me nitpick first by saying that in group theory=20
> "presentation" means "presentation by generators and
> relations" whereas you mean a (linear) "representation".
>
> In this way of thinking, the most compact way to represent Z_n is by
> generators
On Thursday, 19 July 2012 15:37:32 UTC+8, Javier López Peña wrote:
>
> I understand that from some point of view mixing groups and
> their representations is a bad idea, but many groups are naturally
> defined as transformation groups and using a matrix presentation
> is just as natural as descri
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:46 PM, charles Bouillaguet
wrote:
> This is getting closer!
>
> Downloading packages from
> 'http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.2.rc0//spkg'.
> Reading package lists
> 404 Error: Package server
> 'http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.
>> The command
>>
>> $ sage -upgrade
>
> More specifically:
>
> sage --upgrade http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.2.rc0/
This is getting closer!
Downloading packages from
'http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.2.rc0//spkg'.
Reading package lists
404 Error: Pac
On 2012-07-19 09:42, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:36 PM, charles Bouillaguet
> wrote:
>> Thanks for the link. But isn't there any way to update my existing
>> SAGE installation without downloading the whole 300+ mb archive (and
>> recompiling everything, which takes a while)? Lik
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:36 PM, charles Bouillaguet
wrote:
> Thanks for the link. But isn't there any way to update my existing
> SAGE installation without downloading the whole 300+ mb archive (and
> recompiling everything, which takes a while)? Like, an equivalent of
> sage -upgrade, or hg pull
I understand that from some point of view mixing groups and
their representations is a bad idea, but many groups are naturally
defined as transformation groups and using a matrix presentation
is just as natural as describing them by permutations, or even more so.
Not to mention the huge size som
Hi Charles,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:28 PM, charles Bouillaguet
wrote:
> I know this must sound like a pretty stupid question, but how do I get
> sage 5.2rc0, if only just to rebase a patch I wrote for an earlier
> version against it? There must be something obvious I'm missing...
Under the "Do
Hi all,
I know this must sound like a pretty stupid question, but how do I get
sage 5.2rc0, if only just to rebase a patch I wrote for an earlier
version against it? There must be something obvious I'm missing...
Thanks,
---
Charles Bouillaguet
--
--
To post to this group, send an email to sag
31 matches
Mail list logo
