On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 2:11:13 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> Please build the following source tarball from source on OS X 10.7:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta13-lion/sage-5.0.beta13-lion.tar
>
> I have included a few fixes, now *hopefully* it s
I would tell you how much faster (fib 25) is in lisp but I got a
division by 0.
It seems to be 0.00 seconds.
(defun fib(n)
(if (< n 2)
n
(+ (fib (- n 1))(fib(- n 2)))
The reason people compare speed is that it is quantitatively easy.
However, people value expressivenes
I've borrowed a new Mac Air from and installed the following
MacOS 10.7.3, XCode 4.2, ctools_february12
I get the same result:
CC=clang
make[1]: *** [installed/ecm-6.3.p4] Error 1
real94m44.538s
user82m42.887s
sys 10m53.847s
Error building Sage.
make: *** [build] Error 1
$ clang --ve
On 11 April 2012 18:51, mmarco wrote:
> I have finally downloaded the file, and it doesn't run on my tablet.
> It seems that it was compiled in a different setup. I have changed to
> a newer version of ubuntu, and will try to compile from source. John,
> is your new version of eclib available as a
I have finally downloaded the file, and it doesn't run on my tablet.
It seems that it was compiled in a different setup. I have changed to
a newer version of ubuntu, and will try to compile from source. John,
is your new version of eclib available as an spkg?
--
To post to this group, send an ema
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 7:17:27 PM UTC+2, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> Yes, this is a very common complaint about R.
Rcpp is nice, yes. But more importantly this shows that a good library and
big support from a strong community overcomes limitations in the
programming language. I guess, nobody
On Apr 11, 11:30 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:15 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> > Apparently a new scientific computing language...
>
> >http://www.r-bloggers.com/julia-i-love-you/
>
> Wow, that article suggests that R is *hideously slow* for recursion.
> I didn't know that.
Yes
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 11:30:51 PM UTC+8, William wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:15 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> > Apparently a new scientific computing language...
> >
> > http://www.r-bloggers.com/julia-i-love-you/
>
> Wow, that article suggests that R is *hideously slow* for recursion.
>
Of course adding an extra @cached_function to the python version handily
beats the pants off the Cython implementation. Not exactly a fair
comparison, but it illustrates the importance of making caching easy.
>
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscri
Hi,
WARNING: All Sage-related services will be off from around 5:45am
until 10am on Saturday morning, April 14.See below.
-- William
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kevin Loranger
Date: Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:39 AM
Subject: [MathFaculty] This Saturday morning Padelford will
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 8:15 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Apparently a new scientific computing language...
>
> http://www.r-bloggers.com/julia-i-love-you/
Wow, that article suggests that R is *hideously slow* for recursion.
I didn't know that.
I tried his R example of computing fibonacci numbers on nt
Apparently a new scientific computing language...
http://www.r-bloggers.com/julia-i-love-you/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at htt
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 4:16 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I've been meaning to make an spkg with my changes (adding AUCTeX
>> support for SageTeX). It would also include customization of the preamble
>> and possibly a fix for this problem.
Hi,
> Perhaps we should make my fork the "official" sage-mode repository so that
> Nick no longer has to be involved.
I've write (maybe even admin) access on Nick's repo I'm pretty sure he will
agree to give your the same right. So I don't really see the point of having a
new fork. It will
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Niles Johnson wrote:
> Rummaging through the plot code, I've come across DOCTEST_MODE a couple of
> times. I can't find it documented anywhere, but it seems to be used as a
> flag for a function to tell whether it's being run for doctesting or not.
That's correct
I have the exactly the same error as Bruce on a brand new MacBook Pro
that came out of the box last Friday and has a fresh install of the
newest XCode, without having migrated any remnants of old XCodes from
any other computer.
MacOS 10.7.3, XCode 4.3.2
$ clang --version
Apple clang version 3.1 (
On Apr 11, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Florent Hivert wrote:
Is there a maintainer? You might be the closest thing we have to a
maintainer. The original author has not been active in Sage
development for quite some time.
>>>
>>> I had an e-mail exchange with Nick Alexander last December an
On Apr 10, 11:36 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-04-11 05:33, Bruce Cohen wrote:> I believe that I am running the
> latest Xcode 4.3.2
>
> Are you sure? I have only seen this error with *older* XCode versions.
I ran the make again last night using clang, get the same error, and
the clang
Rummaging through the plot code, I've come across DOCTEST_MODE a couple of
times. I can't find it documented anywhere, but it seems to be used as a
flag for a function to tell whether it's being run for doctesting or not.
Probably you can copy some of the examples to produce a doctest which on
On 4/11/12 3:29 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:13:50 AM UTC+1, jason wrote:
The Sage cell server spkg includes both zmq and pyzmq since we use
these
to communicate.
Just to be clear, you haven't written spkgs for zeromq/pyzmq but just
have them as dependenc
> >> Is there a maintainer? You might be the closest thing we have to a
> >> maintainer. The original author has not been active in Sage
> >> development for quite some time.
> >
> > I had an e-mail exchange with Nick Alexander last December and he was quite
> > responsive. He integrated a patch
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:44 PM, David Joyner wrote:
> I accidentally downloaded sage 5.0b13 instead of sage 5.0b13-lion. However,
> the
> build just finished without errors (after over 12 hours!) on an ibook
> running 10.7.
> I tested sage 5.0b13 by starting it and typing the command 2+3. It sta
On Apr 11, 2012, at 10:34 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> FWIW, I've been meaning to make an spkg with my changes (adding AUCTeX
> support for SageTeX). It would also include customization of the preamble and
> possibly a fix for this problem.
I made spkg that you can try [1].
I can confirm the Unkno
Hi Paulo,
Thanks for the feedback. I will look at you suggestions, and then I will
post a reply later. Eventually I could post a reviewed patch in the trac
server (and also link to this discussion).
In fact, there should be no terrible mistakes. I wrote the translation as
close as possible to
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:10:28AM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-04-11 09:08, Florent Hivert wrote:
> > I haven't yet bissected the problem. I'd like to make it a blocker for the
> > next release.
> Go ahead. I can always lower the priority again :-)
First of all, can you confirm the pro
On Apr 11, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 06:10:50PM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
>> On 4/10/12 5:56 PM, Florent Hivert wrote:
>>> Hum ! As I said, I'm not the maintainer of the package and this is going
>>> quickly out of my expertise range...
>>
>> Is there a main
On Wednesday, April 11, 2012 12:13:50 AM UTC+1, jason wrote:
>
> The Sage cell server spkg includes both zmq and pyzmq since we use these
> to communicate.
>
Just to be clear, you haven't written spkgs for zeromq/pyzmq but just have
them as dependencies? Because I couldn't find any spkgs except
On Apr 11, 2012, at 12:28 AM, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> I cloned the hg repo and produced an spkg from that directory. I see
> the problem now.
>
> I've got the correct spkg file now, and emacs doesn't complain on
> loading a .py file, but now I get another error after `M-x sage`:
> "Unknown butto
On 2012-04-11 09:08, Florent Hivert wrote:
> I haven't yet bissected the problem. I'd like to make it a blocker for the
> next release.
Go ahead. I can always lower the priority again :-)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 06:10:50PM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 4/10/12 5:56 PM, Florent Hivert wrote:
> >Hum ! As I said, I'm not the maintainer of the package and this is going
> >quickly out of my expertise range...
>
> Is there a maintainer? You might be the closest thing we have to a
> mai
Hi Jeroen,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 08:51:35AM +0200, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> The current plan is to release sage-5.0.beta14 merging most or all of
> the tickets which are currently positively reviewed.
>
> After that, no more patches adding new features, only bugfixes. So I
> guess there m
31 matches
Mail list logo
