Also send me spkg/logs/mpir-2.1.3.p10.log
Did you set CFLAGS="-march=native"?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.googl
On Apr 2, 8:56 pm, Nils Bruin wrote:
> In short, the problem is that
>
> at( f(x,y,z), [x=u,y=v,z=w])
>
> is valid in maxima but cannot be handled because of the list embedded
> in an expression.
Problem solved by extending the grammar accepted by
sage.misc.parser.Parser. Now an "arg" can also be
With respect to Jmol, there seems to be a lot of traffic about older
Java versions and exploitable security holes.
http://developers.slashdot.org/story/12/04/03/1350223/mozilla-blocks-vulnerable-java-versions-in-firefox
Something similar with Apple, apparently.
So just an FYI on this - not that
On Apr 3, 2012, at 16:26 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-04-04 01:08, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2012, at 06:11 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>>> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
>>> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
>>>
>>> http
On 2012-04-04 01:08, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> On Apr 3, 2012, at 06:11 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
>> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
>> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
>>
>> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.b
Am 2012-04-04 00:43, schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
> On 2012-04-03, François Bissey wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:38:32 Daniel Krenn wrote:
>>> I upgraded the package, available at [1]. The upgrading was really easy;
>>> all patches were already included into 1.6, so obsolete.
>
> Please open a trac
On Apr 3, 2012, at 06:11 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar
Second download wor
On 2012-04-03, François Bissey wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:38:32 Daniel Krenn wrote:
>> Am 2012-04-01 12:25, schrieb Daniel Krenn:
>> > Am 2012-03-31 19:36, schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>> >> On 2012-03-31, Daniel Krenn wrote:
>> >>> At the moment networkx-1.2.p2.spkg is included in Sage. Networkx
On Apr 3, 2012, at 06:11 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar
Just tried to downl
On Tue, 03 Apr 2012 23:38:32 Daniel Krenn wrote:
> Am 2012-04-01 12:25, schrieb Daniel Krenn:
> > Am 2012-03-31 19:36, schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
> >> On 2012-03-31, Daniel Krenn wrote:
> >>> At the moment networkx-1.2.p2.spkg is included in Sage. Networkx 1.2
> >>> is
> >>> now over 20 month old and
Am 2012-04-01 12:25, schrieb Daniel Krenn:
> Am 2012-03-31 19:36, schrieb Dima Pasechnik:
>> On 2012-03-31, Daniel Krenn wrote:
>>> At the moment networkx-1.2.p2.spkg is included in Sage. Networkx 1.2 is
>>> now over 20 month old and networkx 1.6 is available. Does anyone plan
>>> upgrading this?
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:56 PM, john.hoebing wrote:
> Its probably a good time to see what we can do to improve the way sage
> handles ordinary differential equations. I would vote against making
> improvements directly to maxima, and instead think about how we can
> implement our own de solvers,
Its probably a good time to see what we can do to improve the way sage
handles ordinary differential equations. I would vote against making
improvements directly to maxima, and instead think about how we can
implement our own de solvers, perhaps using sympy, or using regular
expression matching to
On 2012-04-03, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
> following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar
>
needless to say, sqrt5.cs.washi
I tested the following with sage -wiki and everything seems to work
fine. There don't seem to be any conflicts between jsmath and mathjax,
for example.
1. Install the following plugin by copying it into
data/plugin/parser/sagecell.py:
https://gist.github.com/2288588
2. The following should
Could somebody with an OS X 10.7 machine please try to build the
following from source, preferably with SAGE_CHECK=yes:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jdemeyer/release/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc/sage-5.0.beta12-gcc.tar
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To uns
On Apr 3, 2012, at 12:47 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Just curious: is the 4.8 app dmg that you can download for OSX 10.6 working
> on OSX 10.7 now? Is that the recommended way to run the Sage app on OSX 10.7?
>
> Jason
It should work as well as the non-app version. I can't test it since I don't
17 matches
Mail list logo
