On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi François, Jeroen and Volker,
>
> On 12 Mrz., 21:58, François Bissey
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:44:21 Jeroen Demeyer wrote:> On 2012-03-12 19:48,
>> Volker Braun wrote:
>> > > One thing that I'm not entirely happy with is that we bu
Hi François, Jeroen and Volker,
On 12 Mrz., 21:58, François Bissey
wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:44:21 Jeroen Demeyer wrote:> On 2012-03-12 19:48,
> Volker Braun wrote:
> > > One thing that I'm not entirely happy with is that we bulid gcc without
> > > graphite/ppl/cloog, ...
>
> > Well, I bel
Dima Pasechnik writes:
> let me put here the fact that I mentioned on the relevant trac ticket, that
> Python 2.7.2 spkg will by default pull Twisted 12 from pypi if it does not
> see
> it installed.
By the way, why is this? I just tried importing twisted into my system
Python 2.7 and it seems
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 6:59 AM, William Stein wrote:
> I would like to make this change sometime in the next few months. If
> anybody has any thoughts, feel free to share.
There's a patch at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12659.
It should allow you have to both old (out-of-place) and
On Friday, 17 February 2012 19:38:10 UTC+8, jason wrote:
>
> The current plan is that twisted will be bundled in with the sagenb
> spkg, and will not have a separate spkg.
>
let me put here the fact that I mentioned on the relevant trac ticket, that
Python 2.7.2 spkg will by default pull Twiste
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:44:21 Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-03-12 19:48, Volker Braun wrote:
> > I'm all in favor of adding the gcc spkg.
> >
> > One thing that I'm not entirely happy with is that we bulid gcc without
> > graphite/ppl/cloog, so I suspect that the code speed isn't as good as it
>
On 2012-03-12 19:48, Volker Braun wrote:
> I'm all in favor of adding the gcc spkg.
>
> One thing that I'm not entirely happy with is that we bulid gcc without
> graphite/ppl/cloog, so I suspect that the code speed isn't as good as it
> could be. But since we only use the self-compiled gcc if the
Ah cool, didn't know!
> > I forgot to add thatmathjaxis supported in the newest version of the
> > sage notebook, eg,http://test.sagenb.org
>
> And the precursor tomathjax(jsmath) is what we support in the current
> notebook.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
On Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:15:35 PM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> What are your +1/-1 to making GCC and MPC standard packages?
>
> +1 (especially since it allows us to build Sage on Lion without making
other compromises)
--
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googl
I'm all in favor of adding the gcc spkg.
One thing that I'm not entirely happy with is that we bulid gcc without
graphite/ppl/cloog, so I suspect that the code speed isn't as good as it
could be. But since we only use the self-compiled gcc if the os-supplied
one is crap I think its fine.
--
It looks like the order of the elements was being determined by their
id which would be system dependent. I've updated the patch and all
should be well now. Thanx for the help.
-Jim
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Mar 11, 8:46 pm, Starx wrote:
>> The patchbot is report
On 03/12/12 11:00, Peter H. wrote:
> I should amend my comment, since I was sloppy. Neither `x+1` nor `-x
> -1` is inherently positive or negative. `|x+1|` is the only thing
> that is, so that output would be the most correct result of your real
> expression. If Maxima doesn't actually return th
I should amend my comment, since I was sloppy. Neither `x+1` nor `-x
-1` is inherently positive or negative. `|x+1|` is the only thing
that is, so that output would be the most correct result of your real
expression. If Maxima doesn't actually return that, as the doc you
quote says it does, or i
Le lundi 12 mars, Keshav Kini a écrit:
> Julien Puydt writes:
> > As it's optional, it's not really added: +1 too.
>
> But it is not optional - Jeroen is proposing to make this a standard
> package. Or did I misunderstand you?
Poor choice of words on my part : it is not "optional" since it's
"st
Julien Puydt writes:
> As it's optional, it's not really added: +1 too.
But it is not optional - Jeroen is proposing to make this a standard
package. Or did I misunderstand you?
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googl
On 3/11/12 10:32 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
Hi,
I just sent a student an email with some links to computations on the
single cell server on aleph.sagemath.org. I used the "shortened
temporary links" to get something shorter. But how long will those links
work?
Those are just IDs in the database, so
On 2012-03-11 23:34, Florent Hivert wrote:
> Isn't it used for compiling Cython code ?
Of course it is indeed. But compiling Cython code is not the main use
I had in mind for this package.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, sen
17 matches
Mail list logo
