Okay, I'll install python 2.7 and retry in the morning. Any other
suggestions in the meantime?
Cheers
On Jan 7, 10:19 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> It appears that you have Python 3 installed on your system, cause I see
> lots of
>
> Making Sage/Python scripts relocatable...
> File "./sage-make_
It appears that you have Python 3 installed on your system, cause I see
lots of
Making Sage/Python scripts relocatable...
File "./sage-make_relative", line 5
print "Making script relocatable"
^SyntaxError: invalid syntax
in your log. In Python 3 print is
Sorry for sounding very ignorant about this process (it's because I
am); but, what other information do you need? What I did was I cd'd
into sage-4.7.2/lib/ and deleted the libppl.* files like Volker
suggested. Then I went back into ~/sage-4.7.2 and make again. My
laptop overheated after about an h
Le 07/01/2012 19:56, ssu a écrit :
Okay. gcc version is 4.6.2 2025. My os is arch bang linux (i686)
with kernel 3.1.5-1-ARCH. What might have gone wrong, should I try it
again?
On Jan 7, 10:27 am, John Cremona wrote:
You need to provide more information about your laptop's operating
sy
> As to why it worked for you, perhaps you only called the Python version of
> your cpdef function.
I'm pretty sure I did not call the Python version in the production
code, but maybe. I did call a cpdef function from Python, which then
called another cpdef, which called another cpdef. At some lev
On 1/6/12 11:35 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Attach a loop to every vertex and colour these loops appropriately (a
loop is an edge – otherwise it's a bug, IMHO).
This gives you an edge colouring.
Ah, right, I forgot about loops. Thanks to everyone with workarounds.
If we end up doing this projec
Okay. gcc version is 4.6.2 2025. My os is arch bang linux (i686)
with kernel 3.1.5-1-ARCH. What might have gone wrong, should I try it
again?
Thank you for your patience,
Paul
On Jan 7, 10:27 am, John Cremona wrote:
> You need to provide more information about your laptop's operating
> sy
You need to provide more information about your laptop's operating
system, which compiler (version of gcc) you are using, before people
can help. All those error messages show is that the build was not
successful.
John
On 7 January 2012 18:12, ssu wrote:
> Thank you. The build finnished. Howeve
Thank you. The build finnished. However now when I start sage there's
a string of import errors before the 'sage:' prompt appears. None of
the basic sage commands seem to work properly, either. Here's the
complete error:
ImportError Traceback (most recent call
last)
I think generators are only supported in def functions, not c(p)def.
Apparently it was a bug that there was no error produced in older cython
versions:
https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/0ea50f346d7cf6aecea4ddab65af85c936f6693b
As to why it worked for you, perhaps you only called the Pytho
Thanks for the reply.
On Jan 7, 11:09 am, Volker Braun wrote:
> We did upgrade to cython-0.15.1 early on in the 4.8.alpha series, fwiw. I
> guess line 90 is the any() construct.
Yeah, I mixed source code for a test program with an error message
from an actual program, sorry.
> Perhaps that was
We did upgrade to cython-0.15.1 early on in the 4.8.alpha series, fwiw. I
guess line 90 is the any() construct. Perhaps that was already broken with
the old cython, it just didn't know? E.g. what happened if the generator
raised an exception?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-dev
http://wiki.sagemath.org/SupportedPlatforms
has not been edited for 6 months and I suspect is rather out of date. There's
references to feature X not working, but should be fixed in Sage 4.6.
Neither Solaris 11 or Centos Linux are listed as "fully supported", though both
are under "Expected t
On Jan 6, 2012, at 19:23 , William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-devel,
>
> Here are pictures from JMM 2012. Many are at the Sage booth...
>
>
> http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.10150486010783682.386745.504538681&type=1&l=1376aa6952
Enjoying your new lens? :-}
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmu
cool!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:26 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Jan 7, 2012 6:41 AM, "David Joyner" wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> > http://sage.sourceforge.net/documentation.html mentioned there points to
>> > a
>>
>>
>> I can't find that page linked to anywhe
On Jan 7, 2012 6:41 AM, "David Joyner" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > http://sage.sourceforge.net/documentation.html mentioned there points
to a
>
>
> I can't find that page linked to anywhere on http://sage.sourceforge.net/
> Unfortunately, although I can lo
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> http://sage.sourceforge.net/documentation.html mentioned there points to a
I can't find that page linked to anywhere on http://sage.sourceforge.net/
Unfortunately, although I can log in with openid, my sf password from
2007 no longer works.
(24 hours later)
Successfully built 4.8.alpha6 with
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/palmieri/SPKG/readline-6.2.p3.spkg
put into spkg/standard before starting to build. All long tests pass
and there is no warning about readline, and history etc all works
normally.
John
On 5 January 2012 20:
Le 07/01/2012 09:37, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
by the way, I do "make -j3" on my ARM box. It holds up OK, and does not
seem to take 30h to build the thing. Building documentation is something
that really takes forever there, though...
Oh? I never *dared* using -j... How long does it take to buil
by the way, I do "make -j3" on my ARM box. It holds up OK, and does not
seem to take 30h to build the thing. Building documentation is something
that really takes forever there, though...
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, sen
Le 07/01/2012 05:44, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
For me, alpha5 built OK on an ARM box running 11.10.
(it needed a couple of ARM-specific fixes, but otherwise was just fine).
It does not have readline-dev installed, which probably explains why I
had not R-related
problems.
Should one expect any regr
http://sage.sourceforge.net/documentation.html mentioned there points to a
stale link,
and the version it points at is 4 years old...
That's a big tag :)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr.
23 matches
Mail list logo
