On Dec 17, 3:27 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 12/17/11 12:27 PM, D. S. McNeil wrote:
>
> >> I pushed the change to test.sagenb.org. Can you verify that the problem is
> >> fixed there? Whenever sagenb.org is rebooted, the change will take effect
> >> there too.
>
> > Looks to have fixed it. As
Hi,
I am using Sage to pass elements between gp and Magma. It works just
fine, except for the messages on the standard output.
My version of gp should print some timings, but when I call it through
SAGE, this doesn't work.
I believe this behavior is ruled by interfaces/gp.py, but I am not
experi
On Saturday, December 17, 2011 3:00:15 PM UTC-8, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> Hi Maarten,
>
> On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:28:47 -0800 (PST)
> Maarten Derickx wrote:
>
> > I was merging my new ipython spkg wich needed review for some time
> > already at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11235 but
Hi Maarten,
On Sat, 17 Dec 2011 14:28:47 -0800 (PST)
Maarten Derickx wrote:
> I was merging my new ipython spkg wich needed review for some time
> already at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11235 but now
> needs work because in the time that it needed review some people
> made http://
I can partially answer my own question. Adding
(setq exec-path (append exec-path '("/usr/texbin")))
(setq exec-path (append exec-path '("/usr/local/bin")))
to my .emacs got sage-view to work. The first path is the one to latex
(got by 'which latex'), the second one is the path to gs.
Still have
Hej All,
I was merging my new ipython spkg wich needed review for some time already
at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11235 but now needs work
because in the time that it needed review some people
made http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11460 and upgraded ipython.
Now I notic
On the same config, I've discovered some bugs with sage-mode that I
didn't have with Leopard/Carbon emacs/previous version of sage, most
notably:
sage: A= PolynomialRing(QQ, 'x') #or any sage object, really
sage: L= range(10)
sage: for i in L:
...A.[TAB] #to get the completion
... and e
On 12/17/11 1:25 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
There are about 10 new python packages that the flask notebook depends
on. Some of these are very small packages. Does anyone have any
objection to lumping all of these together into a sagenb-dependencies
spkg? These are the dependencies included in this sp
On 12/17/11 12:27 PM, D. S. McNeil wrote:
I pushed the change to test.sagenb.org. Can you verify that the problem is
fixed there? Whenever sagenb.org is rebooted, the change will take effect
there too.
Looks to have fixed it. As long as the random seed on the notebook
code side can't acciden
Oh, I see, thanks. It is definitely not "Due to numerical instability",
though. This should be fixed in the patch.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, vi
> I pushed the change to test.sagenb.org. Can you verify that the problem is
> fixed there? Whenever sagenb.org is rebooted, the change will take effect
> there too.
Looks to have fixed it. As long as the random seed on the notebook
code side can't accidentally be changed from within a cell, it
I've cleaned up the communication code with the server; It can now display
plots:
http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/Sage.apk
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For mor
oh and I've tried to get sage-view to insert a plot and got
error in process filter: Symbol's function definition is void: dired-
rename-file
On 17 déc, 17:43, Pierre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have switched to OS X Lion 10.7.2, and the only emacs I've found was
> Cocoa Emacs 23.3 (9.0) (while Carbon E
Hi,
I have switched to OS X Lion 10.7.2, and the only emacs I've found was
Cocoa Emacs 23.3 (9.0) (while Carbon Emacs does not seem to work).
I have installed sage 4.7.2 and sage-mode. I had to add (require 'help-
mode) before (require 'sage "sage") as somebody instructed on this
forum.
Things a
On 12/17/11 2:11 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Dec 16, 2011 11:25 PM, "Jason Grout" mailto:jason-s...@creativetrax.com>> wrote:
>
> There are about 10 new python packages that the flask notebook
depends on. Some of these are very small packages. Does anyone have
any objection to lumping all of
On 12/17/11 3:09 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2011-12-17 08:25, Jason Grout wrote:
There are about 10 new python packages that the flask notebook depends
on. Some of these are very small packages. Does anyone have any
objection to lumping all of these together into a sagenb-dependencies
spkg?
It's http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12170 .
For Florian Hess ideas see my post in
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sage-devel/function$20fields%7Csort:date/sage-devel/eO1q8jc0Ysk/1hNp0WoNocAJ
of wich you are probably already aware.
--
To post to this group, send an email
Sage Days 35 (aka Sage-Flint Days) will start in 15 minutes.
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/
* Eviatar [2011-12-16 20:22:37 -0800]:
> sage: n(pi - 3).n(prec=2)
> 0.12
This approximates n(pi - 3) using two bits of precision so this should
not be too surprising:
sage: n(pi - 3)
0.141592653589793
sage: n(_, prec=2)
0.12
> sage: n(pi - 3, prec=2)
> 0.00
This approximates both pi and 3 with t
On 2011-12-17 08:25, Jason Grout wrote:
> There are about 10 new python packages that the flask notebook depends
> on. Some of these are very small packages. Does anyone have any
> objection to lumping all of these together into a sagenb-dependencies
> spkg?
In my opinion, it depends on the funct
Which ticket? Thanks, William
On Dec 16, 2011 7:56 PM, "syd.lavas...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> Thank you for you advices. I wrote the wrapper and submitted it. I
> also checked the singular's code briefly. It seems that fundamentally
> the same as the one I cited in counting singularit
On Dec 16, 2011 11:25 PM, "Jason Grout" wrote:
>
> There are about 10 new python packages that the flask notebook depends
on. Some of these are very small packages. Does anyone have any objection
to lumping all of these together into a sagenb-dependencies spkg?
I can see no big advantage over n
22 matches
Mail list logo
