Hi Javier,
On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 10:12:08AM -0800, javier wrote:
> I have uploaded the conjugacy classes code to the trac server:
> trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7886
>
> All the test passed, but the sage -coverage command complained about a
> missing testsuite, so I added one (witho
Hi Javier,
A quick reply,
> I have uploaded the conjugacy classes code to the trac server:
> trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7886
>
> All the test passed, but the sage -coverage command complained about a
> missing testsuite, so I added one (without adding any new test
> functions). Muc
> > > - SAGE_CONF_OPTS="--enable-shared --disable-static"
> > > + # Also build the static library to be used by e.g. ECM:
> > > + # SAGE_CONF_OPTS="--enable-shared --disable-static"
> > > + SAGE_CONF_OPTS="--enable-shared --enable-static"
> > > + # (Further options to 'configure' are add
Hi David,
thanks for looking at the code! My reply to you concern below.
On Dec 6, 7:35 pm, David Joyner wrote:
> Okay. The code seems fine. I have a nagging worry that
> you can have slightly different groups G1, G2 (say G2 is
> a direct product of G1 with a central element of order 2).
> Isn't
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:58 PM, javier wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 6, 6:55 pm, David Joyner wrote:
>> I guess I am going blind. I don't see a _cmp_
>> inhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/7886/trac_7886_c...
>> Which line is it?
>
> Oops!
> My bad, forgot to add the new conjugacy_class
On Dec 6, 6:55 pm, David Joyner wrote:
> I guess I am going blind. I don't see a _cmp_
> inhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/7886/trac_7886_c...
> Which line is it?
Oops!
My bad, forgot to add the new conjugacy_classes.py file to the hg
repository. I uploaded it in the patch
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:39 PM, javier wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Dec 6, 6:29 pm, David Joyner wrote:
>>
>> Where is it? Is it in one of the patches posted to the trac ticket?
>
> Yes, it is in trac_7886_conjugacy_classes.patch
I guess I am going blind. I don't see a _cmp_ in
http://trac.sagemat
Hi David,
On Dec 6, 6:29 pm, David Joyner wrote:
>
> Where is it? Is it in one of the patches posted to the trac ticket?
Yes, it is in trac_7886_conjugacy_classes.patch
Cheers,
Javier
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send a
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:12 PM, javier wrote:
> Dear Sage developers,
>
> I have uploaded the conjugacy classes code to the trac server:
> trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7886
>
> All the test passed, but the sage -coverage command complained about a
> missing testsuite, so I added one (without
Dear Sage developers,
I have uploaded the conjugacy classes code to the trac server:
trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7886
All the test passed, but the sage -coverage command complained about a
missing testsuite, so I added one (without adding any new test
functions). Much to my surprise, the t
On Dec 6, 12:43 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 12/5/11 11:12 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> > Nice. The ability to trace points on the curve so easily would be
> > *very* welcome.
>
> I don't think it would be very difficult to write a jsxgraph or flot
> backend to matplotlib to automatically generate
Hi Javier,
On 6 Dez., 11:33, javier wrote:
> On a second thought, if I cache the method in B as well, when I call
> the
> (uncached) method in A the result will be cached in B, right?
Yes, this is what I was going to suggest, but apparently our messages
crossed.
Best regards,
Simon
--
To post
Hi Javier,
On 6 Dez., 09:43, javier wrote:
> > It is not clear to me why you would try to do A.foo(E) when you can
> > easily do E.foo().
>
> Because in my original problem, I am trying to over-ride the
> inefficient base class method with a smarter version. However, the
> smarter version can fai
On a second thought, if I cache the method in B as well, when I call
the
(uncached) method in A the result will be cached in B, right?
So something like this will work:
sage: class A:
: @cached_method
: def foo(self):
: print "A.foo"
:
sage: class B(A):
: @
Hi SImon,
On 6 dic, 00:25, Simon King wrote:
> I think that this is the wrong conclusion. It is easily possible to
> call the cached method that is inherited from the base class. Also, it
> is "class", not "category", by the way: The category framework is not
> involved here.
True, I obviously m
15 matches
Mail list logo
