I'm sorry, I was testing it and tried "while 1: print 'Hello world'". It
seems to still be working on that, and doesn't output anything anymore.
Maybe a timeout is necessary?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 at 06:51AM -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
> This is fixed in #11963 (needs review! :)
Now has a positive review. Thanks for fixing that part of my problem!
By the way, my recent flurry of complaints about various plotting things
are all related to this worksheet that I've been work
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 at 08:19PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> Right now, we have:
>
> sage: list_plot([1+I, 2+I, 4-I])
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> ...
> TypeError: unable to simplify to float approximation
>
> I suppose you could rewrite list_plot so that it calls a function
> _list_plo
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 at 04:07PM +0200, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Hi
>
> 0 jan@muizenberg:/var/autofs/misc/home/jan$grep example.sage
> /usr/local/src/sage-4.7.2/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/sagetex/example.tex
> % (pdf)latex example.tex; sage example.sage; pdflatex example.tex
> when running Sage
Sorry, for the spam threat. I just wanted to target somebody on the
ticket team and I wasn't sure:
1) how sage-devel is effective for that
2) how responsive other members are.
3) If I'm boring people on the list with n'importe quoi.
But apparently it worked pretty well in all directions.
Best
See
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/740/app-installation-problem-on-mac-os-x-lion
Is it possible that Sage will work on Lion if compiled on Snow
Leopard, but not the app? At the same time, using the command line
says that it can't find IPython.
Any ideas on this? Apparently the Mac app is get
Hi Maarten,
Thank you for the link. It was the thing I was looking for. I have
read Hess's paper on his algorithm for computing basis for Riemann-
Roch space . I'm pretty happy to start working on it , once I went
through your code and see what we have available at hand.
Also for my research I wa
On 11/16/11 8:04 PM, Eviatar wrote:
One problem: random doesn't work. It generates the same value every time.
Good point. The worker process is forked from one main server process,
so it inherits the same random seed each time. I suppose it would be
easy enough to reset the random seed. Do
One problem: random doesn't work. It generates the same value every time.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com
Hi Julian,
Thank you very much for your reply. If you put the isomorphisms codes
available, it will probably helps me a lot. I don't know about the
iterated extensions, but when I wanted to write GHS attack related
code for my Masters back in 2008 I started with sage and I used "the
field of frac
Does this lattice module already exists somewhere (I didn't found it on my
search...). Further I haven't found any trac-ticket (but maybe missed)...
I ask, because I think about implementing an algorithm to calculate the
Voronoi cell (can be used to calculate some lattice quantities like the
co
Thanks All! These were exactly what I was looking for.
frosty
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:59 AM, David Roe wrote:
> Also useful is http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageServer
> David
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:55, Maarten Derickx
> wrote:
> > Or if you like the web better
> > view:
> http://www.sag
Done
On 16 November 2011 17:38, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:07:15 AM UTC-8, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> 0 jan@muizenberg:/var/autofs/**misc/home/jan$grep example.sage
>> /usr/local/src/sage-4.7.2/**local/share/texmf/tex/generic/**sagetex/example.tex
>>
Mainly, because there's no current reason to install libjpeg.dylib.
It's just a potentional source of confusion and breakage for the
future. I'd feel differently if there were other uses of it. For
instance, if someone were to wrap Dan Bloomberg's excellent Leptonica
library at http://www.leptoni
Also useful is http://wiki.sagemath.org/SageServer
David
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 09:55, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
> Or if you like the web better
> view: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sagenb/notebook/notebook_object.html
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroup
[...]
>> (Should I write directly to William Stein).
> Probably not, sage-devel is the right place to ask. Or also, the
> "comment" section on http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9054
> Jeroen.
Correct. I read every sage-* mailing lists and all trac notifications.
I prefer that as much as
Or if you like the web better
view: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/reference/sagenb/notebook/notebook_object.html
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit
You can configure the port sage is available on, so you can also make it
available on port 80. Please do the following in your own sage:
sage: notebook?
Read what gets displayed, and come back if you have more specific questions.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegrou
I have sage installed & working. I'm seeking tips on how to set it up
for web usage by folks visiting my website. I want them to be able to
register and log in to the Notebook or use the command line interface.
I
see this is possible by checking out other sites, & eventually I would
figure out a wa
Dear Syd,
As one of the active participants on that ticket. I can probably also help
out, I would like it if you add me as a CC to future posts about this
subject on sage-devel (which I think is where you should ask future
questions).
Very nice that you want to get started implementing more fun
Hi Syd,
* Jeroen Demeyer [2011-11-16 14:36:24 +0100]:
> On 2011-11-16 09:12, syd.lavas...@gmail.com wrote:
> > (Should I write directly to William Stein).
> Probably not, sage-devel is the right place to ask. Or also, the
> "comment" section on http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9054
I'm
On Wednesday, November 16, 2011 6:07:15 AM UTC-8, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> 0 jan@muizenberg:/var/autofs/misc/home/jan$grep example.sage
> /usr/local/src/sage-4.7.2/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/sagetex/example.tex
> % (pdf)latex example.tex; sage example.sage; pdflatex example.tex
> w
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:10:54 +0100
Florent Hivert wrote:
> > Pynac supports indexed expressions already. It just isn't wrapped in
> > Sage yet. Again, there is an experimental patch available:
> >
> > http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/burcin/indexed_expression-20110727.patch
> >
> > Since yo
> Pynac supports indexed expressions already. It just isn't wrapped in
> Sage yet. Again, there is an experimental patch available:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/burcin/indexed_expression-20110727.patch
>
> Since you can wrap any hashable Python object in a symbolic expression
> with S
Hi
0 jan@muizenberg:/var/autofs/misc/home/jan$grep example.sage
/usr/local/src/sage-4.7.2/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/sagetex/example.tex
% (pdf)latex example.tex; sage example.sage; pdflatex example.tex
when running Sage on \texttt{example.sage}, that gets printed to the
In sage 4.7.2 the fi
> > q.set_show_options(legend_label='tangent')
>
> > which would be the same as:
>
> > plot(tan(x), (x,-1,1),legend_label='tangent')
>
> That could be convenient. I'm producing my plots in one function and
> showing them in another, so it's nice to be able to alter things after
> the "production"
Hi,
I discovered that units have the same flaw. This all look good:
sage: units.length.meter^2
meter^2
sage: u = units.length.meter^2
sage: u.op[0]
meter
sage: type(units.length.meter)
However, getting back meter from u give not a unit but a plain Expression:
sage: type(u.op[0])
sage: u
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 at 06:51AM -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
> This is fixed in #11963 (needs review! :)
I looked over your patch and it seems good. I'll check it out tomorrow
morning when I'm at my work computer.
> Likewise:
> >
> >sage: q = plot(tan(x), (x,-1,1))
> >sage: q.set_legend_options(title
On 2011-11-16 09:12, syd.lavas...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I would like to know what's the status of the function field package
> development in Sage, i.e. this ticket:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9054
Currently, it has positive_review which means that in theory it is re
> > sage: q = plot(tan(x), (x,-1,1))
> > sage: q.set_legend_options(title='tangent!')
>
> > does nothing. Am I doing something wrong? Have I found some bugs?
>
> I don't know about this. It would be something to look into. It might
Not exactly a bug. You have to actually have a function with l
Hi Florent,
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:29:38 +0100
Florent Hivert wrote:
> So I'm trying to inherits from Expression. Here is my code:
>
> from sage.symbolic.expression import Expression
> class IndexedVarExpr(Expression):
> def index(self):
> return self._index
>
> class IndexedVar(S
On 2011-11-15 21:19, William Stein wrote:
> It's not the RAM that matters for "out of memory errors", but the
> amount of "memory", as Jeren says.You could probably build and
> run the full test suite on a machine with 500MB RAM if you had
> sufficiently fast swap.
Exactly. I meant "virtual me
On 11/15/11 10:44 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
It seems that I've discovered more broken things in the plotting code!
I'm trying to get my plots to look right, and I've discovered that I
can't alter the legend or aspect ratio with the relevant "set_" functions:
sage: q = plot(tan(x), (x,-1,1))
sage: q.
On 11/16/11 1:21 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
I do like the idea of _list_plot() accepting only one format, and the
user-facing list_plot() doing the work of mangling your data into that
accepted format. Seems like a nice separation of function. (Although
that's very close to the current situation with l
The fundamental issue is that the symbolic ring SR has no concept of
"variable", everything is of type Expression. Since v+1 doesn't have an
index associated to it, you can't have indices in any consistent manner.
I think the SR elements should be derived classes of Expression if they are
"ele
Hi there,
I would like to know what's the status of the function field package
development in Sage, i.e. this ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9054
I would like to know when is the tentative date of the release (though
I think I can download the patch and install it myself) and
36 matches
Mail list logo
