On 2011-10-25 02:33, Dan Drake wrote:
> It seems like no one wants to have an epic break-all-patches-in-trac
> patch that removes all the trailing whitespace in the Sage library --
> and, some people like some trailing whitespace, so perhaps we should
> also add just a warning to the sage-merge scr
diff has options to deal with whitespace.
-b --ignore-space-change
-w --ignore-all-space
Tim Daly
On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 07:35 +0200, Florent Hivert wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:20:47AM -0700, Keshav Kini wrote:
> > Hmm. I have to say I'm surprised that people are advocating for using
> >
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:20:47AM -0700, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Hmm. I have to say I'm surprised that people are advocating for using
> trailing whitespace at all, as it seemed to me to be quite universally
> reviled in the programming world. But on some reflection, the only real
> problem with t
> > whitespace to files). There are way too many patches on trac with chunks
> > that just remove trailing whitespace introduced in other patches, IMHO. If
> > we take some stance on it (much like our official endorsement of PEP 8),
> > this will be reduced. If people agree I'll make a ticket to a
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 at 07:54AM -0700, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Shouldn't we have mention trailing whitespace somewhere in the developer's
> guide - namely telling people to omit it? Having such a policy makes for
> cleaner revision control, as most agree (for example, at some point git by
> default
Hmm. I have to say I'm surprised that people are advocating for using
trailing whitespace at all, as it seemed to me to be quite universally
reviled in the programming world. But on some reflection, the only real
problem with trailing whitespace - other than that it bloats files and that
it, er
On 10/24/11 12:07 PM, leif wrote:
On 24 Okt., 17:33, Jason Grout wrote:
Here is one of the big situations when I like trailing spaces:
def hello():$
print 'hi'$
$
print 'bye'$
To me, it's annoying to have the cursor jump back to column 0 when
scrolling down through the funct
On 24 Okt., 17:33, Jason Grout wrote:
> Here is one of the big situations when I like trailing spaces:
>
> def hello():$
> print 'hi'$
> $
> print 'bye'$
>
> To me, it's annoying to have the cursor jump back to column 0 when
> scrolling down through the function. I think that is th
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 10/24/11 11:14 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>>
>>> To me, it's annoying to have the cursor jump back to column 0 when
>>> scrolling
>>> down through the function. I think that is the only situation where I
>>> get
>>> annoyed with my emacs sett
On 10/24/11 11:14 AM, John Cremona wrote:
To me, it's annoying to have the cursor jump back to column 0 when scrolling
down through the function. I think that is the only situation where I get
annoyed with my emacs settings of deleting trailing whitespace.
Thanks,
Jason
If you tell me how t
> To me, it's annoying to have the cursor jump back to column 0 when scrolling
> down through the function. I think that is the only situation where I get
> annoyed with my emacs settings of deleting trailing whitespace.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
If you tell me how to make emacs do that, I'll stop
On 24 Okt., 16:32, Manuel Werner Luethi
wrote:
> I intended to compile SAGE on Ubuntu 11.10 but during make there was an
> error. [...]
> ../kernel/libkernel.a(mod_raw.o): In function `dynl_open':
> /home/USER/Desktop/sage-4.7.1/spkg/build/singular-3-1-1-4.p12/src/kernel/mo
> d_raw.cc:217:
>
> un
Over on the zeromq mailing list, there was a post about running zeromq
through tcpcrypt [1]. This seems like a good idea for our single-cell
server, which uses zeromq to communicate between server and workers. It
also seems like it might be nice to support it for sagenb.org, etc.
My question
On 10/24/11 10:19 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
By the way, I think trailing whitespace is often intentional. Some
people consider this a good thing:
Some text$
$
Some more text$
Some people also consider this a good thing:
-$
TITLE $
-$
Hell, I used to think these were good
Hi Marco,
On 24 Okt., 16:44, mmarco wrote:
> When is all this expected to be merged?
I am sorry to say that #4539 was made dependent on my patch at #9138,
which at that time had a positive review and was actually merged in
some alpha version of sage-4.7.2. But then, it turned out that #9138
caus
On 2011-10-24 17:19, Keshav Kini wrote:
> By the way, I think trailing whitespace is often intentional. Some
> people consider this a good thing:
>
> Some text$
> $
> Some more text$
Personally, I do NOT consider this a problem. I would like to remove
whitespace after non-empty lines
By the way, I think trailing whitespace is often intentional. Some people
consider this a good thing:
Some text$
$
Some more text$
Some people also consider this a good thing:
-$
TITLE$
-$
Hell, I used to think these were good things until someone kn
The main point is that it would add legitimacy to people insisting that
patches not contain trailing whitespace before giving them positive review
on trac :)
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsub
On 2011-10-24 16:54, Keshav Kini wrote:
> If we take some stance on it, this will be reduced.
[citation needed]
It's obvious that it's better not to have trailing whitespace in files.
I'm not against adding a section in the developer's manual for this but
I doubt it will make any difference in pr
Hi all,
This is pretty trivial, but hey, sage-devel is a bit slow recently :)
Shouldn't we have mention trailing whitespace somewhere in the developer's
guide - namely telling people to omit it? Having such a policy makes for
cleaner revision control, as most agree (for example, at some point g
When is all this expected to be merged?
On 24 oct, 15:50, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:32:12 -0300
> Pablo De Napoli wrote:
>
> > Many thanks!
> > I see that with this patches, it would be esasy to have also a Weyl
> > algebra implementation in Sage
>
> Yes, writin
Hi Pablo,
On Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:32:12 -0300
Pablo De Napoli wrote:
> Many thanks!
> I see that with this patches, it would be esasy to have also a Weyl
> algebra implementation in Sage
Yes, writing constructors for Weyl algebras will be an easy step when
it is merged.
We've been waiting a lon
Hi Burcin,
Many thanks!
I see that with this patches, it would be esasy to have also a Weyl
algebra implementation in Sage
Cheers,
Pablo
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi Pablo,
>
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:49:39 -0300
> Pablo De Napoli wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011
Hi Pablo,
On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 18:49:39 -0300
Pablo De Napoli wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Pablo De Napoli
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I need to perform computations with linear differential operators
> > whose coefficients are polynomials
> > in several variables (in Euclean space).
>
It is possible that i could get some funding to organize a workshop,
which must be related to aplied and computational algebraic topology.
I thought about organizing a sage days devoted to braids and/or knots
and links; maybe with sprints aimed at the implementation of free and
finitely presented g
25 matches
Mail list logo
