sqrt5.cs should back up now.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:15, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:05 AM, R. Andrew Ohana
> wrote:
>> I'm not in Seattle currently, so I can't until probably Wednesday. Is there
>> anyone else who has access to the hardware?
>
> No worries.
>
> Incident
Hi all,
John Cremona and I have just been successful with a grant application
to fund a Sage - FLINT Days at Warwick University in December this
year (dates and organisers to be announced shortly). This will be
organised as a Sage Days with a focus on topics relevant to fast
Number Theory. This co
This is exactly what trac #10458 is about:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10458
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@goo
Hi Pedro,
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Pedro Cruz wrote:
> I've search here
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/conventions.html#documentation-strings
>
> looking for this type of docstring:
>
> """
>sage: txt=r''' hello
>: this goes on '''
> """
>
> This does not work using
I've search here
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/conventions.html#documentation-strings
looking for this type of docstring:
"""
sage: txt=r''' hello
: this goes on '''
"""
This does not work using "sage -t module.py".
However python works like:
r"""
>>> 1+1
2
>>> t
> > Backwards-incompatible, hence fodder for the mythical Sage 5.0 ...
> We deprecate after one year. I think deprecation should have nothing
> to do with "sage 5.0". The policy, which we agreed on long ago is
Sometimes we've talked about "1 year + next (major) version". My
point was that 5.0
On 14 Sep., 11:35, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:45:58PM -0700, Michael Rubinstein wrote:
> > Thanks! That worked for me too, though I'm not sure how you decided on
> > the specific choices of libraries to link to.
>
> Good to hear. The libraries are just what I needed
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:45:58PM -0700, Michael Rubinstein wrote:
> Thanks! That worked for me too, though I'm not sure how you decided on
> the specific choices of libraries to link to.
Good to hear. The libraries are just what I needed to add to get it to link
without errors after starting wit
