On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 07:32 +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
> Le 05/09/2011 02:41, leif a écrit :
> > One shouldn't upgrade packages just for the sake of higher version
> > numbers in Sage though, and there are packages where upgrading is
> > indeed non-trivial, because of functional changes in upstream
Le 05/09/2011 02:41, leif a écrit :
One shouldn't upgrade packages just for the sake of higher version
numbers in Sage though, and there are packages where upgrading is
indeed non-trivial, because of functional changes in upstream, or a
lot of changes made by Sage to its current version.
I can'
On 4 Sep., 21:52, "Georg S. Weber" wrote:
> nice post. Let's look at two absolute core components of Sage, the
> versions of which shipped with the current Sage-4.7.1 release are
> outdated: MPIR and Python.
>
> Regarding MPIR, the relations with upsteam are cordial, but
> nevertheless Sage-4.7.1
Perhaps you could be more specific on what f90 tools in Maxima you
could use.
(Converting to python/ cython may be educational etc, but maybe not so
likely to pay off soon.)
It is also possible to generate functions in Maxima itself that are
compiled to machine language.
If you declare variables t
Hej Guilherme,
Here at http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/3117/
there is a modified version of your worksheet wich uses fast_callable to
make your example way faster. It is not as fast as your fortran example, but
as the timings at the bottom show this in not very reasonable to expect in
pure pytho
I'm trying to implement actions for a custom class and I'm tripping over
this apparently old bug http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8928.
Example from the ticket:
sage: class MyRing2(CombinatorialFreeModule):
... def __init__(self):
... R = QQ
... category = (Mod
On 4 Sep., 08:47, daly wrote:
> The Cost of Going it Alone by Dave
> Nearyhttp://blogs.gnome.org/bolsh/2011/09/01/the-cost-of-going-it-alone/
Yeah,
nice post. Let's look at two absolute core components of Sage, the
versions of which shipped with the current Sage-4.7.1 release are
outdated: MP
Hi
On Ubuntu 11.04 natty and an Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T6670 @ 2.20GHz
(HP 620)
I get an error in make testlong:
sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_algebra.rst"
**
File
"/usr/local/src/sage-4.7.1/
On Sunday, September 4, 2011, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
> Nice post. Altough it's really written from a commercial point of view, so
not everything is directly applicable to sage.
Also, we very rarely (never?) make significant changes directly to upstream
code - just tiny bigfixes on occasion. It se
Hello,
I am using Sage for a while, but I am still a newbie.
I am an engineer studying nonlinear dynamical systems. I do the
modeling by means of symbolic manipulation (Galerkin approximation)
but I need a numerical solver to time integrate the model. On another
tread I mentioned a spkg I made fo
On Sun, 04 Sep 2011 03:09:31 Maarten Derickx wrote:
> Nice post. Altough it's really written from a commercial point of view, so
> not everything is directly applicable to sage.
>
> Also I clearly feel how much work it takes to get, "a small fix" merged
> upstream is very dependent on the particul
Nice post. Altough it's really written from a commercial point of view, so
not everything is directly applicable to sage.
Also I clearly feel how much work it takes to get, "a small fix" merged
upstream is very dependent on the particular upstream in question. In his
article he sais it's such a
12 matches
Mail list logo
