Just a ping that http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11401 now
has a proper fix and explanation on it. It was already marked "needs
review" with a poor, symptomatic fix. The new one solves the heart of
the problem, I hope. So if someone feels up to reviewing it ... In
principle it could affec
Free Software Supporter, the Free Software Foundation's monthly news
digest and action update.
Encourage your friends to subscribe and help us build an audience by
adding our subscriber widget to your web site.
* Subscribe: http://www.fsf.org/free-software-supporter
* Widget: http://www.f
Thanks for the quick response. That sounds exiting! So with a bit of luck
the problems with building Maxima will be solved somewhere in the near
future.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr..
Dear All,
At http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11751 I try to fix some
problems with FreeModule_generic. I've put a patch up there wich makes the
code work wich I want to work (only very small changes where needed, since
it is just fixing some bugs in the code wich is already there). Th
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
> On sage support there was a question on building sage on lion and using
> xcode 4. So I was wondering is there any news in this area?
The main thing holding it back right now were problems building
boehm_gc and ECL, but both have been fixe
On sage support there was a question on building sage on lion and using
xcode 4. So I was wondering is there any news in this area?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For
On Aug 31, 12:05 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On a second thought, I just fix the error message, make it less cryptic, by
> throwing an exception explicitly.
I don't see a ticket yet - please cc me when you make one. The
"second thought" sounds like a good improvement.
Rob
--
To post to this g
Hi Martin, Paul and William,
On 31 Aug., 19:46, William Stein wrote:
> Random Thoughts: Since we banned using "is_MPolynomial", and we do
> have Polynomial in the global namespace, I can't see an alternative to
> having MPolynomial. That said, it's perhaps bad that we have
> Polynomial in the g
It seems the icons on the main page as well as the favicon were
changed from blue to purple. Why is this? I think it looked better
before; now it looks somewhat washed-out.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sag
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
> Sorry, don't have acces to matlab, maybe I should have stayed out of this
> discussion and forget my prejudice about matlab.
No worries! I've been hanging out on sage-flame too much recently, so
I'm sorry that my response was so inapprop
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11764
>
> Paul Zimmermann writes:
>
> """
> for univariate polynomials we have the class Polynomial:
>
> sage: R. = QQ[]
> sage: isinstance(x+1, Polynomial)
> True
> However for mu
Sorry, don't have acces to matlab, maybe I should have stayed out of this
discussion and forget my prejudice about matlab.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more opt
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
> There was one very concrete thing that I found out recently that would
> probably have set me off if I was a matlab user trying to switch to sage.
> sage: (-2.0)^(1/3)
> 0.629960524947437 + 1.09112363597172*I
(1) If I remember correctly,
There was one very concrete thing that I found out recently that would
probably have set me off if I was a matlab user trying to switch to sage.
sage: (-2.0)^(1/3)
0.629960524947437 + 1.09112363597172*I
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from t
Hi,
at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11764
Paul Zimmermann writes:
"""
for univariate polynomials we have the class Polynomial:
sage: R. = QQ[]
sage: isinstance(x+1, Polynomial)
True
However for multivariate polynomials we have to write:
sage: R. = QQ[]
sage: isinstance(x+y, s
Qualifications to answer this question:
-I have used MATLAB for 10 years in my research
-About 3 years ago, I mostly switched to Python+numpy/scipy/
matplotlib, and I lead a project that includes about a dozen people
developing code in Python
-I use SAGE (mainly the notebook) in my teaching.
Fo
On a second thought, I just fix the error message, make it less cryptic, by
throwing an exception explicitly.
Sorry for noise.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
17 matches
Mail list logo
