use
r"""
blah
"""
stings, not just
"""
blah without backslash escape
"""
strings.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://gro
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 at 02:39PM +0200, Julien Puydt wrote:
> sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py"
> **
> File "/home/jpuydt/sage-4.7.1/devel/sage/sage/misc/sagedoc.py", line 876:
> sage: len(search_doc('tre
I've noticed I can no longer download worksheets to a file on Safari
5.1. Firefox behaves normally. This happens with older and newer
Sage versions (where older means not 4.7.1). I am *not* using the
Flask notebook on these, haven't tried it.
I'm referring to "Save worksheet to a file", by the
Hello!
I tried to upload a worksheet file on my local Sage Notebook server,
but it failed. It has already been some time ago. It looks like it is
currently impossible to upload the files bigger than some critical size
to the Notebook server. In my case the worksheet file has a size of ~25
MB.
On Aug 23, 7:55 am, Chris Seberino wrote:
> So what is the next step to move forward?
You may want to look at how implicit_mul is currently processing its
input. Perhaps you can easily adapt it for your purposes. Python's
library itself should be able to help you quite a bit too. There is
tokeniz
The "-force_build" did not work and I believe it's a problem of "how to use
import" on new Sage packages.
Recalling first message, I want to build a new optional package based on
*.py modules.
It seems that
sage -t my_module.py
moves my_module.py to a .sage/tmp folder and there executes the
On 8/23/11 12:26 PM, v...@ukr.net wrote:
Do I understand correctly that to use the implicit multiplication one
will need to "turn it on" explicitly and that the default syntax will
not differ much from the Python's original syntax?
That is correct.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an
On 2011-08-23, at 12:10 , Maarten Derickx wrote:
> I don't know if you are a developer, but it might be possible that you still
> have have queue in one of your repositories. To test this do
>
>sage -hg qdiff
>
> in the different repositories.
>
> Also did you try removing (or beter moving
Hello!
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Chris Seberino wrote:
...
>
> And as had been said before, this will be an *option* so will not
> affect people that don't care for it.
>
Do I understand correctly that to use the implicit multiplication one
will need to "turn it on" explicit
ps http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/Trust
might be of help considering the untrusted user
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://
I don't know if you are a developer, but it might be possible that you still
have have queue in one of your repositories. To test this do
sage -hg qdiff
in the different repositories.
Also did you try removing (or beter moving outside the sage directory) the
not tracked file somewhere?
Al
On Aug 23, 6:56 am, Stan Schymanski wrote:
> For me, this is the only useful way how to remove chunks from
> large worksheets, so I would be very grateful for your help.
Stan - I have not looked at the ticket, but you could hack out large
chunks of a worksheet in a very similar manner with a text
On Aug 23, 7:55 am, Chris Seberino wrote:
> So what is the next step to move forward?
Open a ticket, implement a solution and attach a patch to the ticket.
See the developer guide
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/index.html
for an outline. It is probably instructive to link back to this t
On Aug 23, 2:26 am, Nils Bruin wrote:
What you *can* do is search back from your
> " (", find what is in front of it and if it's not an operator (these
> are reserved words and special symbols, so you *can* recognize those
> without looking at bindings), replace the space with a "*".
That would
sage -hg diff finds nothing in any of the 5 repositories suggested above.
sage -hg st does find one extra file in devel/sage:
% sage -hg st
? sage/rings/finite_field_givaro.pyx
An attempt to do sage -upgrade still fails with:
There are uncommitted changes in the Sage root repository. Aborting.
Dear all,
When trying to change the code of a worksheet in a text editor (using
the edit button in the worksheet), I get the following error message
whenever I want to save changes:
Bad Request
Maximum length of 102400 bytes exceeded.
A ticket has been created for this problem 12 months ago (htt
Le 23/08/2011 15:52, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
This is a bit off-topic:
I have an AC100 laptop (just like yours, I presume), although made for
Japanese market. And I managed to (half)brick it attempting to
install Ubuntu on its solid state drive. :( In particular I seem to have
nuked its bootload
This is a bit off-topic:
I have an AC100 laptop (just like yours, I presume), although made for
Japanese market. And I managed to (half)brick it attempting to
install Ubuntu on its solid state drive. :( In particular I seem to have
nuked its bootloader, so the original Android doesn't quite wor
Hi,
I fought again to compile sage on my little ARM box, then reported the
progress in trac -- with some hope 4.7.2 may compile without patching.
I then ran make ptestlong to check for sanity. Unsurprisingly, things
are not perfect yet (after all I mostly focused on making it compile),
see b
Thanks,
That appeared to work for me on all the repositories except local/bin
in that one I got the dreaded message;
"Not trusting file /usr/local/sage-4.7/local/bin/.hg/hgrc from
untrusted user xyz, group root"
I tried all the usual chown, chmod things on everything from sage_root
and down.
On A
On Aug 22, 11:17 pm, Chris Seberino wrote:
> In order to deal with this situation, as well as the conditional
> "(this) or (that)", my simple regex would need to be
> changed to only trigger when a *VARIABLE* was followed by a space and
> left parens.
Unfortunately you don't have that information
On Aug 23, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Aug 22, 11:04 pm, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>
>> Personally I don't use implicit multiplication, but I do wish there were a
>> function that changed implicit to explicit since it can be convenient to
>> copy a polynomial from somewhere that uses impl
On Aug 22, 11:04 pm, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> Personally I don't use implicit multiplication, but I do wish there were a
> function that changed implicit to explicit since it can be convenient to copy
> a polynomial from somewhere that uses implicit multiplication and going back
> to add *'s is an
23 matches
Mail list logo
