[sage-devel] Re: ask.sagemath.org is down

2011-08-04 Thread John H Palmieri
On Thursday, August 4, 2011 12:29:38 PM UTC-7, leif wrote: > > On 4 Aug., 18:04, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > > So, although broken, things are broken as expected ;-) > > > > Quote of the day :-) > > Yep. > > Some strange thing: > > While trac was back relatively fast (since 7:17 or earlier),

[sage-devel] Re: Shall / can we reduce the number of Sage related Google groups?

2011-08-04 Thread leif
On 4 Aug., 12:36, Simon King wrote: > On 3 Aug., 23:31, v...@ukr.net wrote: > > 1. I need a source of help  - this means a mailing list or a forum with > > a quick response (like a couple of hours from the Simon King's > > example). > > There is another support location, namely ask-sage. Here, I s

[sage-devel] test driving maxima-5.25.0

2011-08-04 Thread Francois Bissey
For those who don't know maxima-5.25.0 is out. Some bits look very good some may just OK. So what happens when you use it with sage, here are the test failures: sage -t -long -force_lib devel/sage- main/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx [?1034h*

[sage-devel] Re: Shall / can we reduce the number of Sage related Google groups?

2011-08-04 Thread leif
On 4 Aug., 11:57, Simon King wrote: > On 3 Aug., 16:51, William Stein wrote: > 1. I'd reverse your statement. If they make the time to read four > small lists, they will just read the same information in a single list > of medium size. It's still easier to selectively (depending on your spare ti

[sage-devel] Re: ask.sagemath.org is down

2011-08-04 Thread leif
On 4 Aug., 18:04, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > So, although broken, things are broken as expected ;-) > > Quote of the day :-) Yep. Some strange thing: While trac was back relatively fast (since 7:17 or earlier), I meanwhile don't get any more notifications for ticket updates. I.e., I did get som

[sage-devel] Re: ask.sagemath.org is down

2011-08-04 Thread Jason Grout
On 8/4/11 11:34 AM, William Stein wrote: On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:32 AM, kcrisman wrote: Service Temporarily Unavailable The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. The server room that houses the sagema

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath.org is down

2011-08-04 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
> So, although broken, things are broken as expected ;-) Quote of the day :-) -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath.org is down

2011-08-04 Thread Harald Schilly
On Thursday, August 4, 2011 5:35:35 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > Also http://www.sagemath.org/ is down > I just came home and noticed it. Well, if the fileserver is gone, apache runs but points to something that doesn't exist. So, although broken, things are broken as expected ;-) H --

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath.org is down

2011-08-04 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
Also http://www.sagemath.org/ is down, there seems to be a serious problem (again) with the Sage cluster. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this g

Re: [sage-devel] ask.sagemath.org is down

2011-08-04 Thread William Stein
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 8:32 AM, kcrisman wrote: > Service Temporarily Unavailable > > The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to > maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. The server room that houses the sagemath cluster had electrical work done on

[sage-devel] ask.sagemath.org is down

2011-08-04 Thread kcrisman
Service Temporarily Unavailable The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later. Apache/2.2.8 (Ubuntu) DAV/2 SVN/1.5.1 mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.5.2 mod_ssl/2.2.8 OpenSSL/0.9.8g mod_wsgi/2.0 Server at ask.sagemath.o

[sage-devel] Re: Shall / can we reduce the number of Sage related Google groups?

2011-08-04 Thread kcrisman
On Aug 4, 6:44 am, Simon King wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On 4 Aug., 09:24, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: > > > I'd merge sage-nt, sage-algebra, sage-padics but the combinat lists > > seem separate and active enough to merit their own group. sage-newbee > > should probably get merged into sage-support,

[sage-devel] Re: Shall / can we reduce the number of Sage related Google groups?

2011-08-04 Thread Simon King
Hi Robert, On 4 Aug., 09:24, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > I'd merge sage-nt, sage-algebra, sage-padics but the combinat lists > seem separate and active enough to merit their own group. sage-newbee > should probably get merged into sage-support, and groups like > sage-finance, sage-dsageng, sage-grid

[sage-devel] Re: Shall / can we reduce the number of Sage related Google groups?

2011-08-04 Thread Simon King
Hi Vladimir, On 3 Aug., 23:31, v...@ukr.net wrote: >  I am not a developer (my only contribution into Sage > is helping with the Russian translation of Sage Tutorial) ... which helps to develop Sage, so, you *are* developer :) >     I'm not a Windows user either, but I'm very interested in Sage

[sage-devel] Re: Shall / can we reduce the number of Sage related Google groups?

2011-08-04 Thread Simon King
Hi Rob! On 3 Aug., 19:04, Rob Beezer wrote: > I read sage-devel and sage-support on the web.  No email.  So the > amount of traffic is almost totally irrelevant to me. Same for me. > And I wouldn't mind learning more number > theory incidentially. So do I. > I think of sage-edu as a safe plac

[sage-devel] Re: Shall / can we reduce the number of Sage related Google groups?

2011-08-04 Thread Simon King
Hi Leif, On 3 Aug., 18:09, leif wrote: > I'd add at least two ot three though: > >  * In a library, you don't mix (more or less) unrelated topics just > because you have only a few books on topic E, F and G. Sorry to modify your picture. In our library, we have sections A, B, C, D, E,... (these

[sage-devel] Re: Shall / can we reduce the number of Sage related Google groups?

2011-08-04 Thread Simon King
Hi Johannes, On 3 Aug., 17:07, Johannes wrote: > maybe it would be a better idea to create a new list like sage-porting > where all discussions about ports to diferent OSs take place. +1 -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

[sage-devel] Re: Shall / can we reduce the number of Sage related Google groups?

2011-08-04 Thread Simon King
Hi! On 3 Aug., 16:51, William Stein wrote: > ... > > (a) Experienced people are busy on the small lists, thus, read sage- > > support less frequently, thus, the big lists are less responsive. > > This is not my experience.  If not for the small lists, some of these > experienced people would just

[sage-devel] Re: Mma CDF doc format

2011-08-04 Thread Volker Braun
Does anybody know more about the following: 1) Where is the specification for the "open" and "public" CDF format? I couldn't find it on their web page, and others can't either. 2) It seems that the CDF player contains a (perhaps neutered) Mathematica kernel. Surely Wolfram doesn't want people t

Re: [sage-devel] Shall / can we reduce the number of Sage related Google groups?

2011-08-04 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Justin C. Walker wrote: > > On Aug 3, 2011, at 07:13 , Simon King wrote: > >> Hi all! >> >> On 1 Aug., 17:18, Jason Grout wrote: >>> On 8/1/11 7:19 AM, Simon King wrote: >>> sage-newbie, sage-solaris, sage-flame, sage-marketing and sage-edu together made