Re: [sage-devel] Re: On the Server

2011-07-08 Thread Mike Hansen
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:06 PM, leif wrote: > On 9 Jul., 01:52, William Stein wrote: >> The main fileserver for the sage.math cluster has had a major hardware >> failure. >> Fortunately, I do have a working recent backup, and will be able to >> eventually >> restore functionality.  Rebuilding

[sage-devel] Constructing free module morphisms

2011-07-08 Thread Rob Beezer
More adventures with free module morphisms. Matrix representations are relative to the bases of the domain and codomain. sage: V = (QQ^3).subspace_with_basis([[1,0,0], [0,0,1]]) sage: H = Hom(V, V) For phi, the list of lists is interpreted as images of the basis elements of V, as elements of QQ^

[sage-devel] Re: On the Server

2011-07-08 Thread leif
On 9 Jul., 01:52, William Stein wrote: > The main fileserver for the sage.math cluster has had a major hardware > failure. > Fortunately, I do have a working recent backup, and will be able to eventually > restore functionality.  Rebuilding /home in order to do this will take > hopefully at most

[sage-devel] Re: Free module equality, Hermite form over PIDs

2011-07-08 Thread Rob Beezer
On Jul 7, 12:55 am, Francis Clarke wrote: > All this should be simple to fix. Sounds good. With a fix for equality, there is still an outstanding problem with comparisons of free modules. Presently, "Modules are ordered by their ambient spaces, then by dimension, then in order by their echelon

[sage-devel] Re: On the Server

2011-07-08 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Some User wrote: > Dear William, > > I found that > my account was cancelled this morning. I can loggin to the server but my > file root "/home/xxx" was deleted. Hence I cann't use sage any more. I > note that many accounts were deleted. What happens? The main files

Re: [sage-devel] trac is down (also www.sagemath.org)

2011-07-08 Thread R. Andrew Ohana
Email from William: Hi, The main NFS file server for the sagemath cluster appears to have completely failed. It won't turn on at all, not even the management interface. This means that *all* services related to sage.math (e.g., wiki's, trac, sagemath.org, etc.) are completely down. On Fri, Jul

[sage-devel] trac is down (also www.sagemath.org)

2011-07-08 Thread leif
Maybe I missed some announcement? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagema

[sage-devel] Re: bug in graph isomorphism in sage-4.7

2011-07-08 Thread Vincent D
On 8 juil, 16:05, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2011-07-08 15:15, Vincent D wrote: > > > Actually, the problem is even worst... the function relabel does not > > do the right job! The graph G2 obtained as above has two loops at the > > vertex 4. > > Well, to what does to vertex 4 get mapped to under

[sage-devel] Re: problems with the sagetex example in SAGE_ROOT/local/share/texmf/tex/generic/sagetex

2011-07-08 Thread Maarten Derickx
Ok, I put a new version of the example up at: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/11583/ It removes the entire section of graphs by making a \begin{comment} \end{comment} block of it together with a notice of how to enable it again. I hope this will make more people use sagetex

Re: [sage-devel] Re: bug in graph isomorphism in sage-4.7

2011-07-08 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2011-07-08 15:15, Vincent D wrote: > Actually, the problem is even worst... the function relabel does not > do the right job! The graph G2 obtained as above has two loops at the > vertex 4. Well, to what does to vertex 4 get mapped to under your "permutation"? -- To post to this group, send a

[sage-devel] Re: bug in graph isomorphism in sage-4.7

2011-07-08 Thread Vincent D
> > How did you get simply "False"?  I always get (False, False) on the last > line, with sage-4.6, sage-4.6.2, sage-4.7 and sage-4.7.1.alpha3. > I also get "(False,False)" but expected "True"! I did a wrong copy- paste operation. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroup

Re: [sage-devel] bug in graph isomorphism in sage-4.7

2011-07-08 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2011-07-08 15:09, Vincent D wrote: > {{{ > sage: G1 = DiGraph(loops=True,multiedges=True) > sage: G1.add_edges([ > ...(0, 0, 'c'), (0, 4, 'b'), (0, 5, 'c'), (0, 5, 't'), (1, 1, > 'c'), > ...(1, 3,'c'), (1, 3, 't'), (1, 5, 'b'), (2, 2, 'c'), (2, 3, > 'b'), > ...(2, 4, 'c'),(2, 4, 't')

[sage-devel] Re: bug in graph isomorphism in sage-4.7

2011-07-08 Thread Vincent D
Actually, the problem is even worst... the function relabel does not do the right job! The graph G2 obtained as above has two loops at the vertex 4. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@goog

[sage-devel] bug in graph isomorphism in sage-4.7

2011-07-08 Thread Vincent D
Hello, I get the following bug on canonical labeling of a nice symmetric directed graph. {{{ sage: G1 = DiGraph(loops=True,multiedges=True) sage: G1.add_edges([ ...(0, 0, 'c'), (0, 4, 'b'), (0, 5, 'c'), (0, 5, 't'), (1, 1, 'c'), ...(1, 3,'c'), (1, 3, 't'), (1, 5, 'b'), (2, 2, 'c'), (2, 3,