thanks a lot, guys. It got past that point in compilation with the
new *.spkg.
On Jul 1, 11:37 am, leif wrote:
> On Jul 1, 4:38 pm, leif wrote:
>
> > On Jun 26, 10:17 pm, Roman Sinayev wrote:
>
> > > I basically swapped the python-2.6.4.p11.spkg file in /sage-4.7/spkg/
> > > standard with the
Dear Simon, dear thematic tutorials lovers
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:19:59PM -0700, Simon King wrote:
> At http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/2813, I have published a worksheet
> that aims at explaining how one can implement a new parent and take
> advantage of both the category framework and
Thanks to some great patch ideas from Mike Hansen and Dima Pasechnik,
and then a lot of boring spkg making and testing by me, we now have
spkgs that resolve all but one of the avoidable build issues for
Cygwin.
So we need testers! If you have access to a Windows box and have the
time to download
On Jul 1, 4:38 pm, leif wrote:
> On Jun 26, 10:17 pm, Roman Sinayev wrote:
>
> > I basically swapped the python-2.6.4.p11.spkg file in /sage-4.7/spkg/
> > standard with the patched one and got the same error.
> > Am I doing something wrong?
>
> I assume you meant "swapped the python-2.6.4.p10.spk
On Jun 26, 10:17 pm, Roman Sinayev wrote:
> I basically swapped the python-2.6.4.p11.spkg file in /sage-4.7/spkg/
> standard with the patched one and got the same error.
> Am I doing something wrong?
I assume you meant "swapped the python-2.6.4.p10.spkg file in /
sage-4.7/spkg/standard" with the
I wonder if http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11561 is
relevant here.
Actually, what is in /etc/issue of your machine?
It could be that neither the package you tried, nor this one on #11561
will work
out of the box, if /etc/issue does not contain a pattern matched
before the patch patches/M
> #10333, we might have a chance to get the optional spkg into 7.4.1,
> and the standard spkg in 7.4.2.
lol! With a long time plan like that one it should work :)
This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may
not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is
Bonjour Samuel,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 07:47:37PM +, slelievre wrote:
> Le 30 juin 2011 09:48, Nicolas M. Thiery a écrit :
> > Pour information:
> >
> >Conférence PyCONFR 2011
> >17 et 18 Septembre 2011
> >Rennes, France
> >
> >Rendez-vous annuel des utilisateurs de Py
Dear all,
Ok, let's not waste more time discussing this. Unless someone
complains loud immediately, I consider that there is a consensus on
making lrcalc a standard spkg, after a one-release period as an
optional spkg in order to satisfy the official rule. I created #11563
accordingly.
If
