I'm wondering if Sage has the following function for polynomials over
a field. Mostly, I don't know if it is a common thing to expect, and
if so, I have no idea what it would be called. So a pointer would be
of real help, if it exists. The paper I am cribbing from is about
matrices over ZZ, but
On 4.7.rc0 it passes without any errors. The OS is Linux Mint 10 64-
bit.
On May 24, 8:21 pm, François wrote:
> If you are using Volker new ATLAS spkg can you tell me what you get from
> this doctest:
> sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/modsym/space.py"
>
> We found in sage-on-gentoo t
Em 5 de abril de 2011 21:02, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
escreveu:
> 2011/4/5 William Stein :
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Rado wrote:
>>> Great job Jason and Mike. Seems the Jmol problem is fixed. At least it
>>> works here on ubuntu and firefox 3.6 and chromium 10 with sun's java.
>>>
If you are using Volker new ATLAS spkg can you tell me what you get from
this doctest:
sage -t -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/modular/modsym/space.py"
We found in sage-on-gentoo that this test fails with some ATLAS-3.9.xx.
Francois
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroup
On May 24, 9:37 pm, luisfe wrote:
> I am not sure if this is a bug or an unexpected bud valid behavior,
> since we are dealing with conversions instead of coercions.
>
> {{{
> sage: K1=PolynomialRing(QQ, 't',10, order=TermOrder('degrevlex', 4) +
> TermOrder('degrevlex', 6) )
> sage: K2=Polynomia
> > > As for Trac, would it bother people (e.g. Dr.
> > > David Kirkby, who was/is involved in a lot of those tickets) if they
> > > get a bunch of junk emails saying that the ticket descriptions are
> > > changed? Also, there are some references in ticket comments, and I
> > > don't know whether t
I am not sure if this is a bug or an unexpected bud valid behavior,
since we are dealing with conversions instead of coercions.
{{{
sage: K1=PolynomialRing(QQ, 't',10, order=TermOrder('degrevlex', 4) +
TermOrder('degrevlex', 6) )
sage: K2=PolynomialRing(ZZ, 't',10)
sage: [K2(f) for f in K1.gens()]
On May 24, 2:17 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kelvin Li wrote:
> > On May 23, 10:32 pm, William Stein wrote:
> >> Hi Kelvin,
>
> >> Thanks for tracking this down. Is there any chance you could try to
> >> fix all the references you find to not point to sagetrac,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Kelvin Li wrote:
> On May 23, 10:32 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Kelvin,
>>
>> Thanks for tracking this down. Is there any chance you could try to
>> fix all the references you find to not point to sagetrac, but instead
>> to trac.sagemath.org? That would be
On May 23, 10:32 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Kelvin,
>
> Thanks for tracking this down. Is there any chance you could try to
> fix all the references you find to not point to sagetrac, but instead
> to trac.sagemath.org? That would be greatly appreciated.
>
> -- William
I can try the Wiki. A
This is also a great example of the difference between '=' and '=='.
If the statement a = b, where to precede everything, then Sage would
know that a - b = 0, and would convert the statement 'a==b' to 'b==b',
which would frustrate the proof.
Jonathan
On May 23, 1:44 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> On
On May 24, 12:33 pm, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Builds OK on MacOSX 10.6, but then I get some weird R doctest
> failures, similar to shown on #5964,
> but with a different cause: in install.log I see several linker
> failures due to an iconv issue:
Oops, stupid me, I had some stale (no, vintage, da
Builds OK on MacOSX 10.6, but then I get some weird R doctest
failures, similar to shown on #5964,
but with a different cause: in install.log I see several linker
failures due to an iconv issue:
...
creating doc/manual/R-lang.html
installing parsed Rd
dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not f
On 2011-05-24 11:52, Simon King wrote:
> It says something about dealloc. That sounds to me as if the error is
> raised in
> sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_template.Polynomial_template.__dealloc__
>
> Raising an error in dealloc should be avoided, shouldn't it?
The problem is that we don't reall
Hi Jeroen,
First of all: Thank you for tracking it down!
On 24 Mai, 09:52, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2011-05-23 18:14, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> static void
> __pyx_tp_dealloc_4sage_5rings_10polynomial_21polynomial_zmod_flint_Polynomial_template(PyObject
> *o) {
> {
> PyObject *etype, *ev
On 2011-May-23 11:06:57 -0700, William Stein wrote:
>Is anybody seriously opposed to me *not* renewing the DNS registration
>for "SAGETRAC.ORG"?
Do you have stats on how often it's being hit? If it's being hit at
all (or you aren't logging hits), I'd suggest you change the config on
boxen to a m
On 2011-05-23 18:14, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> It is well known that Cython may "ignore" exceptions when they are
> raised in cdef functions without "except" value. However, when working
> on #7794, we got messages like the following:
>
> Exception KeyboardInterrupt in 0 ignored
I have tracked thi
17 matches
Mail list logo
