[sage-devel] Re: AbelianGroup constructor can't handle its own elements

2011-05-09 Thread Simon King
Hi Gonzalo, On 10 Mai, 03:58, Gonzalo Tornaria wrote: > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:34 PM, John Cremona wrote: > > I forwarded this thread to sage-algebra. > > Thanks John. I'm actually not subscribed to sage-algebra. > > Is it undesirable to discuss this here? It did happen that people suggested

[sage-devel] Re: Deprecating a propety attribute

2011-05-09 Thread Kwankyu Lee
Hi Jason, I totally agree with you. Thanks for the definitive comments. Kwankyu -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.g

Re: [sage-devel] Re: AbelianGroup constructor can't handle its own elements

2011-05-09 Thread Gonzalo Tornaria
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:34 PM, John Cremona wrote: > I forwarded this thread to sage-algebra. Thanks John. I'm actually not subscribed to sage-algebra. Is it undesirable to discuss this here? Gonzalo -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: [...] >> I was thinking about this a lot yesterday, and there are a lot more >> issues to resolve, than it seems at first sight. In particular, some >> packages like Python is doing some

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw >>> wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >

Re: [sage-devel] New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2011-05-09 18:01, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 4:43 AM, David Kirkby wrote: >>> On 8 May 2011 05:37, Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:45 AM, David Kirkby wrote: > On 7 May 2011 10:59, Jeroen D

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw >> wrote: >>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On

Re: [sage-devel] New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2011-05-09 18:01, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 4:43 AM, David Kirkby wrote: >> On 8 May 2011 05:37, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:45 AM, David Kirkby wrote: On 7 May 2011 10:59, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2011-05-06 19:53, Robert Bradshaw wro

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw > wrote: >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >>>

Re: [sage-devel] New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 4:43 AM, David Kirkby wrote: > On 8 May 2011 05:37, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 6:45 AM, David Kirkby wrote: >>> On 7 May 2011 10:59, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2011-05-06 19:53, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > Even better would be to checksum the sou

[sage-devel] Re: Deprecating a propety attribute

2011-05-09 Thread Jason Grout
On 5/9/11 1:24 AM, Kwankyu Lee wrote: Hi, I am going to deprecate a property attribute defined in a certain class with the reason being that in Sage, using a method to obtain a property of objects is preferred than using property attributes. I think an example is that we use parent.ngens() rathe

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw [...] >> What about >> dependencies (e.g. if the version of Cython was updated, would all the >> stuff depending on Cython get re-compiled? > > No. Only the other way round -- if you want to inst

Re: [sage-devel] Re: New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: >>> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Robert Bradshaw >>> wrote: >>> [...] Were I to design the system from scratch, I'd put

Re: [sage-devel] New guidelines for spkg's

2011-05-09 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 05/ 8/11 12:52 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: On 2011-05-08 02:58, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: find src -print -exec cksum {} \; | awk '{print $1}' | sort | cksum | awk '{print $1}' The most portable solution would probably be a small Python script. Personally, I think the *dates* in the src/ direct