I know about these bug reports -- similar ones appeared on a different
context --. Unfortunately I am at a peak of work load and will solve them
slower than usual. Thanks for reminding.
Juanjo
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 04/28/11 06:30 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote
On 04/28/11 06:30 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Hi,
it has been reported that there are issues in trying to build Maxima on Cygwin
using ECL. Does this look like an ECL issue. See error message at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11260
Note this is Windows 7, not XP or Vista. It works
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Hi,
> it has been reported that there are issues in trying to build Maxima on
> Cygwin using ECL. Does this look like an ECL issue. See error message at
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11260
Another data point: it builds fi
Hi,
it has been reported that there are issues in trying to build Maxima on Cygwin
using ECL. Does this look like an ECL issue. See error message at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11260
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting s
Here is the ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11265
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 at 06:32PM -0700, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>> I hear about patchbot here and there. I understand it as an automatic
>> patch testing system. Is that available to an occasional developer
>> like me? Or is that for the release manager
Hi,
I tried XCode 4 and came to conclusion that it is buggy as hell
- I can't build working Sage (due to startup-time segfaults, as
described here),
I can't even build a working copy of MPIR, etc etc...
Even worse is behaviour with its clang compilers (they can't even
compile several parts of Sag
On Apr 27, 10:26 pm, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> I just looked into the detex function. To me, it seems a little buggy.
>
> 1. "\ldots", "\cdots" are both converted to "...". Hence there is no reason
> not to convert "\dots" to "..."
>
> 2. The programming logic introduces a bug. For example "souldots"
Thanks, Dan!
Kwankyu
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
I just looked into the detex function. To me, it seems a little buggy.
1. "\ldots", "\cdots" are both converted to "...". Hence there is no reason
not to convert "\dots" to "..."
2. The programming logic introduces a bug. For example "souldots" is
converted to "sou...". That is, if there is a w
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 at 06:32PM -0700, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> I hear about patchbot here and there. I understand it as an automatic
> patch testing system. Is that available to an occasional developer
> like me? Or is that for the release manager and his/her lieutenants?
> Please give me a short guide
So \ldots is converted to "...", but \dots is not. Ok.
Thanks, John!
Kwankyu
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.goog
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 6:54:29 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 6:06:21 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>>
>> Other solution would be to convert \ldots in latex markup to ... in
>> commandline. Currently, \dots inside ` ` is just converted to "dots". This
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 6:06:21 PM UTC-7, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
> Other solution would be to convert \ldots in latex markup to ... in
> commandline. Currently, \dots inside ` ` is just converted to "dots". This
> looks ugly in commandline.
>
In my experience, \ldots is converted to ...
Hi Johin,
You may be interested in the ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10289
Would you kindly review it? It's long been in "needs review" state.
Kwankyu
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Hi,
I hear about patchbot here and there. I understand it as an automatic patch
testing system. Is that available to an occasional developer like me? Or is
that for the release manager and his/her lieutenants? Please give me a short
guide on it or a reference to it. Thank you.
Kwankyu
--
To
Other solution would be to convert \ldots in latex markup to ... in
commandline. Currently, \dots inside ` ` is just converted to "dots". This
looks ugly in commandline.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sag
sage: (-x +y == 0) in [x -y == 0]
True
^^^ should be
sage: (-x +y < 0) in [x -y < 0]
True
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http:
greetings, I have been using Sage extensively in the past several months
and really like it. Hopefully I can make some contributions to it directly
someday.
Below lists two things about Expression in Sage that are not very intuitive
and should get addressed because it is very error-prone,
> On 27 April 2011 21:28, William Stein wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Aly Deines showed me what happened when she installed Xcode 4 then
> > built Sage. She build Sage-4.7.rc0 itself, and it compiled fine.
> > However, when she ran it, it crashed on startup. The traceback
>
> > implicates Pynac:
> C
On 27 April 2011 21:28, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Aly Deines showed me what happened when she installed Xcode 4 then
> built Sage. She build Sage-4.7.rc0 itself, and it compiled fine.
> However, when she ran it, it crashed on startup. The traceback
> implicates Pynac:
Could this be relate
Hi,
Aly Deines showed me what happened when she installed Xcode 4 then
built Sage. She build Sage-4.7.rc0 itself, and it compiled fine.
However, when she ran it, it crashed on startup. The traceback
implicates Pynac:
(gdb)
#0 0x000107a20c64 in PyInt_FromLong (ival=-5) at Objects/intobject
On Apr 25, 8:04 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 08:45:06AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
> On the other hand, there is no point in adding a sentence like "We
> here give an interesting example", as it does not bring any
> information:
It may be useful, in case the other examp
Hi Martin,
On 27 Apr., 17:06, Martin Raum
wrote:
> I still don't have a strong oppinion on this. This is mainly because I
> would like to see one additional test: Could you compare (timewise)
> the creation of say 1 or 10 million (easy) objects based on a version
> with and without patch?
By "ob
Hi Sage-Devel,
Wow, there are currently 237 tickets that are set to "needs review" on
trac right now [1].
[1]http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/30
I would like to encourage people to referee more tickets. That's it.
-- William
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:53 AM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> Wow, there are currently 237 tickets that are set to "needs review" on
> trac right now [1].
>
> [1] http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/30
>
> I would like to encourage people to referee more tickets. That's it.
I still don't have a strong oppinion on this. This is mainly because I
would like to see one additional test: Could you compare (timewise)
the creation of say 1 or 10 million (easy) objects based on a version
with and without patch? In principle, I am in favor of you suggestion,
but this seems like
+1: I trust you. That might not be a well-enough informed basis for
backing the proposal, but it might at least generate some other
responses!
John
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Sorry to bother you again, but I think that changes on a very basic
> level such as sage/struc
Sorry to bother you again, but I think that changes on a very basic
level such as sage/structure/element.pxd require sage-devel's
blessing.
On 25 Apr., 19:57, Simon King wrote:
> The background of my question is trac ticket #5. It provides a
> Cython version of @cached_method, and it is reall
just forwarding here.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dima Pasechnik
Date: Apr 27, 8:03 pm
Subject: ECL-11.1.1 fails to compile maxima on WIndows 7 / Cygwin
1.7.9
To: sage-windows
Basically, it's an ECL bug/feature related to playing fast and loose
with DLLs.
It seems to be a sho
Please review ticket #10620 to upgrade sphynix
Pablo
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> I also prefer trac, but I know why: it's shorter! Also it's more clearly
> related to trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac . Patch comments also say stuff like
> "trac #1234", not "ticket #1234".
Hi,
How about converting triple dots (...) in math(I mean inside ` `) in a
docstring automatically to \dots so that it appears nice both in commandline
and in notebook? Does this have a trac ticket?
Kwankyu
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscrib
32 matches
Mail list logo
