On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> I recall reporting some weirdness on Windows 7, originating from the
> randomized addressing issue.
> (that's what rebase and rebaseall Cygwin utilities are/were fighting).
> At that time Cygwin still had Python 2.5.
>
> Is it correct that
Mike,
I recall reporting some weirdness on Windows 7, originating from the
randomized addressing issue.
(that's what rebase and rebaseall Cygwin utilities are/were fighting).
At that time Cygwin still had Python 2.5.
Is it correct that since then it has fixed itself, as Cygwin folks
found a way t
Hello,
Sorry about the delay in response.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Alexandre Blondin Massé
wrote:
> 1. What remains to be done?
All of the current known build issues are listed at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/wiki/CygwinPort under the "Build
Tickets" section. They all currently
Hi !
Thank you for the detailed answer. It will help to find someone who
could work on the Windows port and I'm glad it seems reasonable to ask
a good undergraduated student in computer science to do the job, at
least partially.
Alexandre
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@go
On Apr 15, 7:16 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Friday, April 15, 2011, kcrisman wrote:
> > Just curious if anyone was working on implementing
> >http://aimath.org/news/partition/brunier-onofor number_of_partitions,
> > or if this is something useful to do (seems to involve both heavy
> > modular
Hi folks,
As you know, the Google group sage-trac-account [1] was recently
created in order to better manage the creation of new accounts and
manage existing ones (and slow down spams). If users are to get their
trac accounts in a timely manner, we need a dedicated group of
volunteer account manag
On 04/15/2011 04:21 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> What I would find unacceptable is if some unknown person wants a trac
> account for an anonymous account, having never posted to sage-devel or
> sage-support.
Agreed. But just to be precise about the definition of 'unknown', I
think it should be ok if
Hi David,
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> What checks do you suggest the trac account managers do? That is quite a
> critical point, as otherwise it would be very easy to spam if no checks were
> made.
It would be even easier to spam using some automated registration
On Friday, April 15, 2011, kcrisman wrote:
> Just curious if anyone was working on implementing
> http://aimath.org/news/partition/brunier-ono for number_of_partitions,
> or if this is something useful to do (seems to involve both heavy
> modular form work and numeric approximation to ensure algeb
On 15 Apr, 2011, at 13:48 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Friday, April 15, 2011 9:43:21 PM UTC+1, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> You can't rely on mail with this in the header:
>From: j...@wolfram.com
> You have to check the detailed headers to be (somewhat) sure that the 'From'
> address is valid.
On Friday, April 15, 2011 9:43:21 PM UTC+1, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> You can't rely on mail with this in the header:
>From: j...@wolfram.com
> You have to check the detailed headers to be (somewhat) sure that the
> 'From' address is valid. Most spammers either cobble together 'From' (as
>
On 15 Apr, 2011, at 13:21 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 15 April 2011 17:51, Volker Braun wrote:
>> I would think that it is sufficient to only allow non-anonymous email
>> accounts. For example:
>> * an institutional address: .edu, .ac.uk, ...
>> * a sourceforge-address associated to an active
On 15 April 2011 17:51, Volker Braun wrote:
> I would think that it is sufficient to only allow non-anonymous email
> accounts. For example:
> * an institutional address: .edu, .ac.uk, ...
> * a sourceforge-address associated to an active project
> * an address that has been used to post to goo
I got these 3 repeatable failures on a Ubuntu 10.10 Linux system I set
up a couple of days back.
For all practical purposes this is a fresh install of the latest
Ubuntu. I just had to install m4, gfortran and g++.
The machine only has 1 GB RAM, but I've built and doctested Sage on a
Solaris syst
%cython at the top of a notebook cell produces links to the C code and
to the yellow-highlighted expandable/collapsible HTML file as side-
effects. It is a simple way to see how Cython works on code, or a
great thing to use in a demo.
On Apr 15, 9:47 am, kcrisman wrote:
> For that matter, that w
I would think that it is sufficient to only allow non-anonymous email
accounts. For example:
* an institutional address: .edu, .ac.uk, ...
* a sourceforge-address associated to an active project
* an address that has been used to post to google groups before (use
search)
People that want to
On Apr 15, 6:07 am, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello everybody !
>
> Robert showed me a few days ago that it was possible to obtain a clear
> version of the C code generated by Cython when compiling a .pyx file,
> while I was trying to read the obfuscated one ^^;
>
> Now I wondered whether it would
>
>
> It would seem wise to me that the email is initially at least the same one
> as they have used to post to sage-devel or sage-support. If they have never
> posted there, I don't feel they need a trac account.
>
I disagree. I've had examples of colleagues who use sage (but never posted)
and h
Hello everybody !
There has been some talk of immutable graphs on this mailing list, and
even though I wrote the first line of this patch many times -- to stop
it all as soon as I begin to think about the
vertex-label/edge-label/multiedges/loops hell -- I was wondering what
people would be interes
Just curious if anyone was working on implementing
http://aimath.org/news/partition/brunier-ono for number_of_partitions,
or if this is something useful to do (seems to involve both heavy
modular form work and numeric approximation to ensure algebraic
numbers are sufficiently approximated.
I'm not
On 04/15/11 11:39 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
Following a recent discussion on sage-devel [1], I've created a new
Google Group called "sage-trac-account" at
Hi Henrietta,
Welcome to the Sage community. Before your trac account could be
setup, the account managers need the following inf
Hi folks,
Following a recent discussion on sage-devel [1], I've created a new
Google Group called "sage-trac-account" at
https://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac-account
The purpose of this group is to manage the accout system on the Sage trac at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/
The idea i
Hello everybody !
Robert showed me a few days ago that it was possible to obtain a clear
version of the C code generated by Cython when compiling a .pyx file,
while I was trying to read the obfuscated one ^^;
Now I wondered whether it would be possible to ask Sage to do it for
some files of my ch
On Apr 14, 10:08 am, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Hello sage-devel,
>
> I wrote a program called "ptyrun", which runs an arbitrary program in a
> pseudo-tty. I personally found it useful, so maybe somebody else will
> find it useful also.
> I personally found this useful in the following
> setting
On 04/14/11 05:29 PM, Alexandre Blondin Massé wrote:
Hi, all!
I know this is a recurrent subject, but I was wondering what was the
status about the Windows port. As many other users/developers of Sage,
I promote it the most I can but one obstacle that keeps showing up is
that it does not work na
25 matches
Mail list logo
