On Apr 7, 5:04 am, Rob Beezer wrote:
> ... is the determinant? Does this make sense to anyone? Am I missing
> something? I can't think of a reason why, and the documentation
> (sage.matrix.matrix2.Matrix._abs_) does not shed any extra light on
> the reason.
>
> This came up on sage-support
>
>
Hi!
I read at http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/trac.html#reviewing-patches:
"If someone (other than you) has posted a patch for a ticket on the
trac server, you can review it!"
Does that mean, if person A (say, Johan Sebastian Rosenkilde Nielsen)
has a patch on trac (say, at #9976), and pers
Hi Dima,
On 7 Apr., 05:13, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Either we decide to drop supporting these users and remove the
> optional glpk, or fix install_package(), and probably
> optional_packages(), too
> to make them version-sensitive.
It *is* supposed to be version-sensitive, IIRC.
--
To post to t
Having optional package GLPK breaks things for people who try to
install it by mistake.
Simply removing it from the optional repository will break things for
people who still run an old version of Sage, from the
times it was still optional.
Either we decide to drop supporting these users and remove
... is the determinant? Does this make sense to anyone? Am I missing
something? I can't think of a reason why, and the documentation
(sage.matrix.matrix2.Matrix._abs_) does not shed any extra light on
the reason.
This came up on sage-support
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_t
glpk is a standard spkg.
Version 4.44, if I am right.
So you seem to have tried installing an optional glpk version 4.42.
This looks like a case for it to be removed.
I already suggested this a while ago, but got a reply from someone
that it's OK to keep it.
Dima
On Apr 7, 7:37 am, VictorMiller
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 4:37 PM, VictorMiller wrote:
> cdef int build_glp_prob(c_glp_prob * lp, c_glp_iocp * iocp, LP, int
> log, bool names) except -1:
>
> ^
>
>
> /Applications/Sage-4.6.2-OSX-64bit-10.6.app/Contents/Resources/sage/
> sp
> For many people, this would make Sage no longer free - it would
> effectively cost $5 and none of that money goes to Sage.
Well, you could still download a binary. They aren't requiring that
people give them money from things compiled with it, are they? But I
agree it's a problem, if true. $5
On Apr 6, 7:19 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> There seems to be a growing body of opinion that Clang
>
> http://clang.llvm.org/
>
> will replace gcc as the compiler of choice for open-source projects - not just
> on OS X.
I've heard this too.
> I also noticed that Xcode is no longer free, though
I got a cython error. On on a Mac book pro running OSX 10.6 with sage
4.6.2 64 bit:
cythoning patch/mipGlpk.pyx to patch/mipGlpk.cpp
Error converting Pyrex file to C:
...
# Builds the GLPK version of the problem
build_glp_prob
Forwarding Mateusz's reply.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mateusz Paprocki <>
Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: [sympy] Re: [sage-devel] Re: [cython-users] Scientific
Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference
To: sy...@googlegroups.com
Cc: sage-devel@googlegroups.com
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:45 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, William Stein wrote:
>> -- Forwarded message --
[...]
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> sorry for the massive cross-post, but since all these projects were
>> highlighted with talks at this event, I figu
On 6 April 2011 21:24, IanSR wrote:
> I've just downloaded Sage 4.6.2 and have spent the past hour trying to sort
> out an error with the MPIR 1.2.2.p2 compilation. Here are some extracts
> which could help someone tell me if I've done something strange.
>
> Ian
I don't know what your problem is
I've just downloaded Sage 4.6.2 and have spent the past hour trying to sort
out an error with the MPIR 1.2.2.p2 compilation. Here are some extracts
which could help someone tell me if I've done something strange.
Ian
#./configure output:
###
On 6 April 2011 19:38, Francois Bissey wrote:
>> I've placed here an updated package with the latest version of sqlite,
> Hi Dave,
>
> we have been using sqlite 3.7.x in sage-on-gentoo since about November 2010
> (when 3.7.2 was marked stable). 3.7.5 works great. Surprisingly a test that
> was fa
> In case people are curious, Sage (because of Singular!) takes 0.07
> seconds to do the benchmark that Sympy takes 11 seconds to do at the
> end of the Sympy talk: http://flask.sagenb.org/home/pub/16/
I noticed that the talk said Sympy has Mma and Maple parsing. We have
something like this,
> I've placed here an updated package with the latest version of sqlite,
> as the one we have in Sage is 2-3 years old.
>
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/sqlite-3.7.5.spkg
>
> I've built Sage from scratch using this, and found all doctests
> passed. But I'd be interested ho
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, William Stein wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Fernando Perez
> Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:26 AM
> Subject: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference
> To: IPython Development list , IPython User
> list , cython-users
>
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:35 AM, William Stein wrote:
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Fernando Perez
> Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:26 AM
> Subject: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference
> To: IPython Development list , IPython User
> list , cython-users
>
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fernando Perez
Date: Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:26 AM
Subject: [cython-users] Scientific Python at SIAM CSE 2011 conference
To: IPython Development list , IPython User
list , cython-users
, matplotlib development list
, Discussion of Numerical
Python , Sci
I've placed here an updated package with the latest version of sqlite,
as the one we have in Sage is 2-3 years old.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/sqlite-3.7.5.spkg
I've built Sage from scratch using this, and found all doctests
passed. But I'd be interested how it works for
> P.S. If anyone has access to the sagemath.org website, could you
> please updatehttp://sagemath.org/help-irc.htmland the related pages
> (such as the Java IRC client) to send users to #sagemath instead of
> #sage-devel ? That would be great.
As a followup to this, now that Google Groups has got
Hi,
I'd like to advertise our IRC channel a little bit, as it is getting
very quiet in there these days. If you are on Freenode IRC, it would
be great if you could idle in #sagemath (the old #sage-devel channel
has lapsed its registration and Harald Schilly has made this new one).
It's a well-know
On 04/ 6/11 02:21 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
In XCode 4.0.1, the default C compiler (cc) is
gcc version 4.2.1 (Based on Apple Inc. build 5658) (LLVM build 2335.9)
(see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Level_Virtual_Machine)
whereas it also has gcc:
gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3
On 04/ 6/11 08:07 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 2011-04-05 22:44, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
make: getcwd: No such file or directory
make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
Error building zn_poly.
I agree with Justin. "getcwd" means "get current working directory".
This is pro
Hi,
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 01:47:41PM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> > Last january, I wrote a small and local patch to the notebook code
> > allowing for for uploading static html doc page as a worksheet in the
> > notebook #10652. As a side effect, it:
> >
> > * allows for uploa
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:12:37PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 04/ 5/11 03:06 PM, Bill Hart wrote:
>> One possibly data point is that GCC 4.3.2 miscompiles GMP and MPIR on
>> x86_64 and as far as I know cannot and will not be worked around.
>
> Thank you for that. I'm not going to address t
On 2011-04-05 22:44, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> make: getcwd: No such file or directory
> make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop.
> Error building zn_poly.
I agree with Justin. "getcwd" means "get current working directory".
This is probably a bug in make, libc or the operating
28 matches
Mail list logo
