Hi,
I don't know why -- maybe because of resources temporarily running
out, but the passwd file was deleted by trac. Fortunately, I was able
to restore it from a very, very recent backup. Things should work
now.
-- William
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 6:23 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 15, 6:4
Just checking that this is desired behavior. I found it useful today.
sage: h(x)=2*sin(x^2)
sage: h()
2*sin(x^2)
In fact, the only other way I can find to access the 'output formula'
of a callable symbolic expression is this:
sage: SR(h)
2*sin(x^2)
If someone has a problem with the first one,
Perfect - thanks, Mike. I'll have a look in a bit.
Rob
On Mar 15, 6:40 pm, Mike Hansen wrote:
> I have a more systematic fix for this in my patch at #10335.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsu
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> I can fix the stabilizer, but I am wondering if something more
> systematic is called for - consistently setting _deg in subgroup
> creation, or earlier in general group creation, and with less reliance
> on the largest moved point as a best gue
On Mar 15, 6:42 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Me too.
>
> Oops…
> Trac detected an internal error:
> ProgrammingError: could not write to hash-join temporary file: No
> space left on device
>
> Can somebody give it a kick?
>
Please. I can't log in - it takes the login info, but rejects the
password.
Stabilizers of permutation groups, and most likely some other
subgroups of permutation groups, do not know much about their
ancestry. In the example below, all the elements of the stabilizer
fix 4 by definition, and so the stabilizer considers itself a subgroup
of the symmetric group on 3 symbols,
I'd like to take a look at this - I have a few days of spring break
left, after that it won't happen. For a somewhat complicated, revised
ticket like this it helps someone like me (and the release manager) if
you keep the ticket description up to date with exactly which patches
(or other files, sp
Its pretty easy to propose a special session, its just an early
deadline: this year its April 2nd, and "Late proposals will not be
considered."
The page is here:
http://www.ams.org/meetings/national/jmm2012/2138_ssrequest
Basically you email Michel Lapidus: lapi...@math.ucr.edu.
-Marshall
On Ma
> On 14 March 2011 16:40, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> > Le 14/03/2011 14:12, David Kirkby a écrit :
> >> Perhaps you can find value of n, such that gamma(n) gives an exact
> >> integer result. If that happens on other CPUs too, then I suggest the
> >> argument to the doctest is changed.
> >
> > The sol
Having not been to the joint meetings, what does this involve? I will
probably make it to next year's, despite just having moved away from Boston.
David
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 18:06, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious if anybody was planning on organizing a special session on
> Sage at
Me too.
Oops…
Trac detected an internal error:
ProgrammingError: could not write to hash-join temporary file: No
space left on device
Can somebody give it a kick?
Thanks,
Rob
On Mar 15, 2:03 pm, Francois Bissey
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not able to look for tickets on trac. I am getting:
> Report
Hi,
I'm curious if anybody was planning on organizing a special session on
Sage at the 2012 AMS/MAA joint meetings in Boston, MA?
There *will* be an official Sage/Elliptic Curves AMS Short Course with
speakers like Kiran Kedlaya, Noam Elkies, and me, at the 2012 meeting.
We (the AMS short course
Personally, I can't login to the sagetrac : it keeps asking my
password. It might be related...
Sébastien
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this
On 14 March 2011 16:40, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> Le 14/03/2011 14:12, David Kirkby a écrit :
>> Perhaps you can find value of n, such that gamma(n) gives an exact
>> integer result. If that happens on other CPUs too, then I suggest the
>> argument to the doctest is changed.
>
> The solution of findi
Hi François,
> I have some questions about semantics and typographics convention in :
>
> 1/ Permutation
> 2/ PermutationGroupElement
> 3/ permutations (with lower p)
> 4/ Permutations
>
> Suppose I don't know Sage. How can I imagine the design of each function ?
> What is the first (question
Hi,
I am not able to look for tickets on trac. I am getting:
Report execution failed: could not write block 1 of temporary file: No space
left on device HINT: Perhaps out of disk space?
Francois
This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may
not reflect the views of the U
Sorry for this noise.
This is removed, reported as spam, and the poster banned. This guy has been
banned before (about 2-3 years ago) but just rejoined under a new email.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:16 PM, reena wrote:
> http://www.catchmany.com/tag/career-and-tecnology
>
> --
> To post to this g
On 15 March 2011 17:05, Julien PUYDT wrote:
> Le 14/03/2011 20:00, Robert Bradshaw a écrit :
>>
>> In the case of the OP's failures, that processor (or libm, libc,
>> whatever) is giving us less accurate answers than anything else we've
>> tested on, and I think it's worth looking into fixing the
http://www.catchmany.com/tag/career-and-tecnology
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: h
Le 14/03/2011 20:00, Robert Bradshaw a écrit :
In the case of the OP's failures, that processor (or libm, libc,
whatever) is giving us less accurate answers than anything else we've
tested on, and I think it's worth looking into fixing the problem, or
even adding an # optional, or as an expected
> > No I am against changing this. For two reasons, when working with
> > polynomials in variable names liks "k", "p". It is not always easy to
> > remember which was the first and which was the second variable. Then
> > it is very handy to pass keywords for evaluation - but still to expect
> > a
The work on the module ParametrizedSurface3d has been completed (see
Ticket #10132 on the SAGE developer track server). Many thanks to
Joris Vankerschaver who made a lot of
code improvements as well as doctests.
Using this module one can find the main invariants of a surface given
by a parametric
Hi,
I have created a ticket (trac #10936) to remove scipy_sandox from sage.
Back in the day of trac #1430 it contained experimental parts waiting to be
integrated in scipy.
Time has passed and now scipy_sandbox has been discontinued for a while
upstream and one part it provided is now in scipy pr
Hi Chris,
On 14 Mrz., 23:31, chris wuthrich
wrote:
> I hope we agree that evaluation (meaning evaluation of all variables
> by some elements in a ring) should yield an element of the ring. I
> don't mind if subs should give back a polynomial in all cases.
>
> [Aside: Strangely this is not the cas
Hi Robert,
On 14 Mrz., 23:29, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> > Yes, but the fact that f(2,3) has a different parent than f(x=2,y=3)
> > has a high probability of being troublesome.
>
> Given f in R[x,y], I think f(x=a, y=b) should do exactly the same
> thing as f(a,b). The parent should be the same as
25 matches
Mail list logo
