I think this: http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/producing_patches.html
should be merged into the "Walking through the Development Process"
section. I found it a much better guide for patch creation.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from thi
I've noticed this too. I wonder if they purposely implemented Sage
syntax or if it's just a very comprehensive parser.
On Feb 20, 7:40 pm, David Kirkby wrote:
> I noticed a couple of things on sage-devel recently about integration
> with Maxima. It appears Maxima can't do either of these two. (We
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> On Feb 19, 7:27 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> (except for devel/sage/sage/tests/startup.py which is a stupid test IMHO)
>
> I have to agree with this.
There are many (important) potential users who do not use Sage at all
just because the start
On Feb 19, 7:27 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> (except for devel/sage/sage/tests/startup.py which is a stupid test IMHO)
I have to agree with this. Or at least it would be nice if this
doctest printed out the actual return value of that timer so we could
see whether it was failing by milliseconds or
I noticed a couple of things on sage-devel recently about integration
with Maxima. It appears Maxima can't do either of these two. (Well, it
does the second one, but leaves it in a overly complex form, that
Sage's n(). can't even use).
integrate( sqrt(x^2+4)/(x^2+1), x )
integrate(log(1+x)/(x^2+1
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> I'm inclined to update the "Walking Through the Development Process"
> section of the Developer Guide.
>
> I've had some feedback (in-person) and have seen a few thoughtful
> comments in various places in sage-devel. Other than mentioning new
>
I'm inclined to update the "Walking Through the Development Process"
section of the Developer Guide.
I've had some feedback (in-person) and have seen a few thoughtful
comments in various places in sage-devel. Other than mentioning new
features (like "hg qpush --move" (!) and the patchbot) and tec
Recently in order to make some constructive comments on a trac ticket
I needed to build a part of it without autoconf, so I temporarily
rename autoconf to something else.
Needless to say I forgot to put it back, which was lucky, as I seem to
have uncovered a bug. Without autoconf, the cddlib pack
One difference is that in the multivariable case, having the return
value in the ring with fewer variables would require that ring to be
created. I don't know how much of an over head that would be. Also,
whether Sage would automatically be ably work with the three subrings
(say) k[x,y], k[x,z],
On 02/20/11 04:05 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:06 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
I was wondering if it would be possible to have a default PDF file,
which indicated what were the necessary steps to generate the real PDF
files.
By default I build the HTML documentation
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 21:07:08 -0800 (PST)
Eviatar wrote:
> Try clearing your cache and cookies (should be Ctrl+Shift+Delete on
> most browsers).
I'm also running into the same problem trying to post a comment to a
ticket. I hit the reply button on a previous comment, write my response
(or paste i
I have recently opened track ticket 10799 solving some problems with
coumputing resultants in univariate polynomial rings. Now i plan to
implement the .discriminant() method for polynomials in multivariable
rings. But i have a doubt now. The method .resultant() returns a
polynomial in the same ring
Hi Dimitry,
On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 09:02:12 -0800 (PST)
Dmitry Shkirmanov wrote:
> Hello list, I use latex to receive a nice output in a notebook. (See
> please http://sagenb.org/home/pub/2678/ for example).
> But there is a little problem: braces in an output of latex() command.
> For example the
13 matches
Mail list logo
