[sage-devel] Re: Odd doctest for Hecke modules

2011-02-06 Thread Rob Beezer
On Feb 6, 8:01 pm, William Stein wrote: > M.derickx, thanks for confirming that the output are isomorphic, so > this is an acceptable change. Maarten and William, Thanks for the help with this one! Rob -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Odd doctest for Hecke modules

2011-02-06 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 8:01 PM, William Stein wrote: > On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:42 AM, koffie wrote: >> >> >> >> On Feb 6, 6:49 am, Rob Beezer wrote: >>> William, Volker, >>> >>> Thanks for the replies.  Kernels for the rationals go to IML and for >>> number fields they go to PARI.  Does either

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Odd doctest for Hecke modules

2011-02-06 Thread William Stein
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 2:42 AM, koffie wrote: > > > > On Feb 6, 6:49 am, Rob Beezer wrote: >> William, Volker, >> >> Thanks for the replies.  Kernels for the rationals go to IML and for >> number fields they go to PARI.  Does either of those rely on linbox? No, neither uses Linbox. IML and PARI

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: Feedback on Tachyon APIs used by SAGE, etc..

2011-02-06 Thread Mike Witt
On 02/06/2011 01:11:18 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: IIRC, the ability to easily do text labels is something that is missing right now. It would be great to be able to attach some text to a point (we don't need shadows or anything fancy). We could probably even do this ourselves if there was an easy

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: Feedback on Tachyon APIs used by SAGE, etc..

2011-02-06 Thread David Joyner
> > Hi William, >  I'm in the process of doing a bunch of updating of the > Tachyon header files and documentation and thought I'd send a > quick ping.  I was wondering if the SAGE project wants or needs > anything changed or improved in the Tachyon APIs, since I'm already > doing some significant

[sage-devel] Re: Odd doctest for Hecke modules

2011-02-06 Thread koffie
On Feb 6, 6:49 am, Rob Beezer wrote: > William, Volker, > > Thanks for the replies.  Kernels for the rationals go to IML and for > number fields they go to PARI.  Does either of those rely on linbox? > > Here's the requested output - three different number fields are > evident.  Thanks for the

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage does (did?) build with an arm processor, but the tests don't pass

2011-02-06 Thread Burcin Erocal
Hi Dima, On Sun, 6 Feb 2011 01:59:33 -0800 (PST) Dima Pasechnik wrote: > Hi Burcin, > indeed, here is another case of buggy libc/libm. > The same workaround as for Cygwin should do the trick (provided that > cephes works on ARM) > Would installing cephes spkg break things on non-Cygwin, or this

[sage-devel] Re: Sage does (did?) build with an arm processor, but the tests don't pass

2011-02-06 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Hi Burcin, indeed, here is another case of buggy libc/libm. The same workaround as for Cygwin should do the trick (provided that cephes works on ARM) Would installing cephes spkg break things on non-Cygwin, or this is safe? Dmitrii On Feb 6, 5:24 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote: > Hi Julien, > > On Sun, 0

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Feedback on Tachyon APIs used by SAGE, etc..

2011-02-06 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 02/ 6/11 07:38 AM, Volker Braun wrote: Dear John& sage-devel, I looked into libtachyon on Sage a while ago. Right now, we don't build the library because tachyon already isn't that easy to build without manual intervention. Sage only drives tachyon through temporary files at the moment. Clea

Re: [sage-devel] Sage does (did?) build with an arm processor, but the tests don't pass

2011-02-06 Thread Burcin Erocal
Hi Julien, On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 09:30:16 +0100 Julien PUYDT wrote: > Le 05/02/2011 11:44, Francois Bissey a écrit : > > So gamma could be called from C, Cython, possibly mpmath, pynac or > > maxima. I guess you could tests the results calling from mpmath or > > maxima. I am guessing that SR(10.0r

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: Feedback on Tachyon APIs used by SAGE, etc..

2011-02-06 Thread Robert Bradshaw
IIRC, the ability to easily do text labels is something that is missing right now. It would be great to be able to attach some text to a point (we don't need shadows or anything fancy). We could probably even do this ourselves if there was an easy API to go from 3D point to 2D point in the output.

Re: [sage-devel] Sage does (did?) build with an arm processor, but the tests don't pass

2011-02-06 Thread Julien PUYDT
Le 05/02/2011 11:44, Francois Bissey a écrit : So gamma could be called from C, Cython, possibly mpmath, pynac or maxima. I guess you could tests the results calling from mpmath or maxima. I am guessing that SR(10.0r).gamma() will end up being a call to maxima to compute gamma but I could be comp