On 2/2/11 9:57 PM, David Roe wrote:
But int(2)**(1.5) causes the same bug that Dan observed.
I think it's actually a bug and should have a trac ticket.
You're right. I've opened http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10736
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googl
But int(2)**(1.5) causes the same bug that Dan observed.
I think it's actually a bug and should have a trac ticket.
David
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 22:51, Jason Grout wrote:
> int(2)^(1.5)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
On 2/2/11 9:48 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
This is slightly annoying and unexpected:
sage: 2^(1.5)
2.82842712474619
sage: int(2)^(1.5)
---
TypeError Traceback (most recent ca
This is slightly annoying and unexpected:
sage: 2^(1.5)
2.82842712474619
sage: int(2)^(1.5)
---
TypeError Traceback (most recent call last)
/home/drake/research/motz
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 1:21 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>>
>> A steering committee might be a good idea, we have JSage which
>> somewhat fulfills this role.
>
> ???
>
> You don't mean the fantastically outdated
> http://www.sagemath.org/jsage/editors.html
> ...
>
> Do you? Notwithstanding that this is
>
> A steering committee might be a good idea, we have JSage which
> somewhat fulfills this role.
???
You don't mean the fantastically outdated
http://www.sagemath.org/jsage/editors.html
...
Do you? Notwithstanding that this is a good idea (but one which has
seemed to always fizzle before, li
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:33 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> As a matter of interst, how many people do you expect make use of code
> to solve Rubiks cube? Do you really think that should have been in the
> main Sage library, or would it have been more appropiate to have such
> functionality as optional
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 7:33 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 2 February 2011 09:55, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>
>>> Sage is something people work on in their spare time, so you can't dictate
>>> to people what they do. But if there was a plan, peopl
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011 7:52:08 PM UTC, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> if [ "$SAGE64" = "yes" ]; then
>echo "64 bit build"
>CFLAGS="-O2 -g -fPIC -m64 "; export CFLAGS
>LDFLAGS="-m64"; export LDFLAGS
> fi
>
Just overwrite CFLAGS/LDFLAGS, no ap/prepending? Nice.
if [ "x`uname -sm`" =
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011 8:50:36 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Dave, can you elaborate on what SAGE64 is good for besides adding -m64?
> Adding the compiler flag could easily be done in the gcc wrapper:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10572
>
> Sorry if this is slightly O
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
> Robert Bradshaw writes:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> and those changes get put into Sage, without any discussion
>>> of what's actually needed in Sage, and what should be written as an external
>>
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9170
has the title "cygwin: get_memory_usage isn't implemented, e.g.,
because there's no top"
Whilst I think measuring memory usage via "top" is not a good idea, a
quick Google shows that "top" is available on Cygwin.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3
On 2 February 2011 16:43, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 2/2/11 10:33 AM, rjf wrote:
>>
>> 1. What happens if you don't have a plan?
>
>>
>> 2. Who makes a plan?
>>
>
> You have long experience with other open-source projects. Have they had
> plans? (I'm really genuinely curious). Who made it? How
>
On Wed, 2011-02-02 at 10:43 -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 2/2/11 10:33 AM, rjf wrote:
> > 1. What happens if you don't have a plan?
> >
> > 2. Who makes a plan?
> >
>
> You have long experience with other open-source projects. Have they had
> plans? (I'm really genuinely curious). Who made
On Wednesday, February 2, 2011 3:55:27 PM UTC, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> There is never any point in setting SAGE64=no. [...] ONLY if it is set
> to "yes" will anything different happen. That is usually adding the
> compiler flag "-m64", though in some cases it's a bit more complex.
>
Dave, can y
Robert Bradshaw writes:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>>
>> and those changes get put into Sage, without any discussion
>> of what's actually needed in Sage, and what should be written as an external
>> program.
>
> I think part of this is due to the historical cont
On 2/2/11 10:33 AM, rjf wrote:
1. What happens if you don't have a plan?
>
> 2. Who makes a plan?
>
You have long experience with other open-source projects. Have they had
plans? (I'm really genuinely curious). Who made it? How
comprehensive/detailed was it? Was the plan a "success" (i.e
Is there already a google summer of code 2011 thread? If not, here it is.
Basic questions:
1. should we try again?
2. who could be a mentor?
I think, trying the same as last year with a focus on the notebook doesn't
hurt - especially because of the rewrite with new ideas.
H
--
To post to this
1. What happens if you don't have a plan?
2. Who makes a plan?
Answer 1.
People choose what to do themselves. For example, making a program
that almost
no one uses faster, maybe breaking it in some subtle way that is not
noticed for
a long time. Adding a feature "because it can be added". Ma
On 1 February 2011 20:17, jtyard wrote:
> Thanks Georg,
>
> Before I posted my question, I had tried an earlier build with
> SAGE64="yes", but (of course) that didn't work and I received the same
> error that I posted. Then I had set SAGE64="no", tried again and got
> the same error.
There is ne
On 2 February 2011 09:55, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>> Sage is something people work on in their spare time, so you can't dictate
>> to people what they do. But if there was a plan, people could be encouraged
>> to work on what is considered importa
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 02/ 1/11 08:50 AM, David Roe wrote:
>
>> I think most people agree that a Windows port is important.
>
> But there's no plan for Sage, which sets out priorities and reasonable
> estimates of time.
>
>> But it still
>> hasn't happened. M
On Tuesday 01 February 2011, kcrisman wrote:
> I respectfully submit that this part of the discussion should move to
> sage-flame.
+1
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_otr: 47F43D1A 5D68C36F 468BAEBA 640E8856 D7951CCF
_www: http://martin
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 2/1/11 5:12 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> Maybe a few of us should get together and offer a bounty...
>
> Or write a grant!
I don't think funding is the sole (primary?) bottleneck--if we had a
(modest) pile of cash, who would we hire? I honestly
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Emil Widmann wrote:
>> > While I use Sage daily on my research I decided that I could not use sage
>> on my classes for freshmen students until it works on windows.
>
> I am curious, why is using the virtual machine image not feasable?
We have a virtual machine. Ob
Hi folks,
The following blog post contains a distillation of a Master's
student's anthropological research on the Fedora online development
community:
http://www.cyber-anthro.com/beta-an-exploration-of-fedora%E2%80%99s-online-open-source-development-community/
There are numerous points in there
26 matches
Mail list logo
