On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:07 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Hi William and others,
>>
>> what is your experience of using mongodb for storing (calculated?)
>> results about elliptic curves? When googling a bit, I found some
>> commits like:
>>
>>
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> Hi William and others,
>
> what is your experience of using mongodb for storing (calculated?)
> results about elliptic curves? When googling a bit, I found some
> commits like:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/purplesage/source/detail?r=2ebfec0907
Hi William and others,
what is your experience of using mongodb for storing (calculated?)
results about elliptic curves? When googling a bit, I found some
commits like:
http://code.google.com/p/purplesage/source/detail?r=2ebfec09070b4a9a549c2a51e8e9dcde9a832925#
I am thinking how to best store s
>Firefox, OpenOffice and FreeBSD are all successful open-source projects, but
>have a documented plans with at least projected time scales. If dates are
>regularly missed, then one needs to determine if they were unrealistic, and so
>allow more time for future plans. IMHO, Sage lacks a real directi
This is a very interesting idea. I was too thinking about a way to
easily implement Sage interacts into webpages. I believe this could be
a very useful feature; imagine giving the viewers of your page easy
access to the full power of Sage! Not only would it be easy to
implement mathematical "widget
On 2/1/11 5:12 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Maybe a few of us should get together and offer a bounty...
Or write a grant!
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more opt
I respectfully submit that this part of the discussion should move to
sage-flame.
Incidentally, the title of the thread is very relevant to the Cygwin
port. I would say that there are *lots* of people who would like it,
but the intersection of that set and those with the relevant
(extremely non-m
On Feb 1, 8:22 am, William Stein wrote:
>..
> > Some history..
>
> >http://www.wikilivres.info/wiki/Twenty_Years_of_Berkeley_Unix:_From_A...
>
> According to that page you were one of 14 people who co-authored a
> grant..
I was the principal investigator for the grant, and wrote the
proposal,
i
OK. Your revised spkg builds and install correctly now, as far as I
can tell.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google
Hi all,
Version 0.17 of mpmath is now available on the project website:
http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/
It can also be downloaded from the Python Package Index:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mpmath/0.17
Mpmath is a pure-Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point
arithmetic that impleme
Dima,
It looks like it is getting set pretty early, so I'm just posting here
the beginning of the install.log, rather than the whole huge file.
But it sounds to me that somehow the problem is that "make clean"
leaves too much behind. For instance, it seems to want to start
building r right away,
Thanks Georg,
Before I posted my question, I had tried an earlier build with
SAGE64="yes", but (of course) that didn't work and I received the same
error that I posted. Then I had set SAGE64="no", tried again and got
the same error. I then ran "make clean" and got the same error. I
even reboote
Hi,
in ticket #10720 nth_root for power series is added; two bugs in sqrt
are pointed out; reviews are appreciated.
Thanks
Mario
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For
On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 08:40 -0800, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:32 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> >> * No documented plan
> >> * No real documented estimates of time scales
> >> * No status reports for the project as a whole.
>
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 8:32 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>> * No documented plan
>> * No real documented estimates of time scales
>> * No status reports for the project as a whole.
>
> If you think a plan as you describe it for overall Sage develop
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 02/ 1/11 08:50 AM, David Roe wrote:
> Some of the problems seem to be firmly in the hands of people who have
> written code in the Sage library, which simply does not work properly on
> Cygwin. They should be able to sort that out.
...
>
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:53 AM, rjf wrote:
> William Stein, for example, says
> "His [RJF's] experience is not based on him actually successfully
> having led
> any nontrivial open source software development projects. He has no
> credentials at all there, as far as I know. Yet, he is speaking
On Jan 31, 4:26 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 1/29/11 9:52 AM, rjf wrote:
>
> > Even assuming that the junk-submitter takes no time at all from
> > project management on the "front end", the need to review
> > "contributions"
> > is certainly a drain. Realizing, and then explaining to some loser
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> I don't know how hard it is, but I got the impression from William only a
> few months back that it did not need a lot of work. But I've come very
> suspicious about time estimates from many Sage developers.
I don't think it needs lots of
Delete any cached symmetrica spkg from
$SAGE_ROOT/spkg/optional/symmetrica*.spkg if it exists and then
sage -f http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sage/spkg/symmetrica-2.0.p6.spkg
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Hi Volker,
On Feb 1, 12:15 pm, Volker Braun wrote:
> Upon a closer look at the symmetrica spkg I noticed a lot of other oddities.
> Particularly ironic is the fact that the binary that fails to link on your
> machine is actually not used. I've updated my spkg
> (http://www.stp.dias.ie/~vbraun/Sag
On 2/1/11 8:21 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
We should also have status reports. See for example some of the archived
FreeBSD status reports.
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2009-04-2009-09.html
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2008-10-2008-12.html
http://www.freebsd.org/news/st
On 02/ 1/11 08:50 AM, David Roe wrote:
I think most people agree that a Windows port is important.
But there's no plan for Sage, which sets out priorities and reasonable estimates
of time.
But it still
hasn't happened. My impression is that the reasons for that are primarily
that it's
1)
On 2/1/11 2:27 AM, luisfe wrote:
I would like to introduce someone to Sage, but I'm wasting my time if she needs
to learn Linux, Solaris, or buy a Mac first. So I'm suggesting she use
Mathematica on Windows. As much as I don't like that idea, I don't feel able to
recommend Sage. If there was a W
> > While I use Sage daily on my research I decided that I could not use sage
> on my classes for freshmen students until it works on windows.
I am curious, why is using the virtual machine image not feasable?
On new computers it should run with acceptable speed. In classroom it
should be even pos
> While I use Sage daily on my research I decided that I could not use sage
on my classes for freshmen students until it works on windows.
Showing your students that there is more to computing than the Xbox
ecosystem is more important than Sage or undergrad calculus or whatever your
freshman cl
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 03:27, luisfe wrote:
> On Feb 1, 3:41 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> > On 01/30/11 03:27 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> > Put another way, there should be a discussion about what Sage needs, how
> urgent
> > it is, and a plan drawn up.
> >
> > I thought porting Sage to Windows via
On Feb 1, 3:41 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> On 01/30/11 03:27 PM, Jonathan wrote:
> Put another way, there should be a discussion about what Sage needs, how
> urgent
> it is, and a plan drawn up.
>
> I thought porting Sage to Windows via Cygwin was seen as important, as it will
> dramaticall
28 matches
Mail list logo
