> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> Last year in January 2010, there were 1580 messages on sage-devel.
> This year, in January 2011, there have so far been only 604 messages.
>
> What are people working on?
>
> Besides writing code on top of Sage for number theory related projects
> (which goes into http://cod
Hi William,
On 29 Jan., 06:31, William Stein wrote:
> What are people working on?
* Finite dimensional quotients of path algebras, with the eventual aim
of computing Ext algebras of basic algebras; that will take a while.
* Various implementations of free (not necessarily unital or
associative)
I prefer number 3, but 2 is my second choice.
-Ivan
On Jan 29, 2011, at 6:35 AM, David Roe wrote:
> I agree with William on "Eviatar 2": it's clear and concise.
> David
>
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 00:25, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
> > Here
Totally refactoring the matrix kernel code in a condo at Whistler,
Canada while my family skies during the day. Slippery boards and I
don't get along.
Only about 300 failing doctests left to chase down.
Rob
On Jan 28, 9:31 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> Last year in January 2010
On 1/28/11 9:31 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
Last year in January 2010, there were 1580 messages on sage-devel.
This year, in January 2011, there have so far been only 604 messages.
What are people working on?
Besides writing code on top of Sage for number theory related projects
(w
Hi William,
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 4:31 PM, William Stein wrote:
> If every person reading responded with a paragraph about what they've
> been up to related to sage this month, then maybe we could get to 1000
> messages by the end of the month!
I've been documenting some graph algorithms used
I agree with William on "Eviatar 2": it's clear and concise.
David
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 00:25, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Harald Schilly
> wrote:
> > Here is my idea, svg sources are in the same dir.
> >
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/schilly/marketing/
Hi Sage-Devel,
Last year in January 2010, there were 1580 messages on sage-devel.
This year, in January 2011, there have so far been only 604 messages.
What are people working on?
Besides writing code on top of Sage for number theory related projects
(which goes into http://code.google.com/p/pur
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> Here is my idea, svg sources are in the same dir.
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/schilly/marketing/stackoverflow/stackoverflow-sage-schilly-01.png
>
Wow, we should use that somehow. (A t-shirt? Sticker? Illustration
for the dev
I made a very basic landing page:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/StackOverflowLanding
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.goo
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 4:39 PM, rjf wrote:
> I think you really don't benefit by recruiting people who have, uh,
> time on their hands and not much else. In fact, extra enthusiasm in
> such individuals can be a real management problem.
While this is true, we aren't offering anything. We don't (
If they are unskilled, this will show in their work, and most of the
time they won't finish it.
If they do a mediocre job, this will be seen in the code, and not
accepted.
What is the problem, then, exactly?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe f
On Jan 28, 4:16 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> I don't have time to track this down at the moment, but as it is a bit
> embarrassing I thought I'd report it here for now:
>
> sage: R. = QQ[]
> sage: E = EllipticCurve([0,0,0,-595*d^2,5586*d^3])
> sage: E.discriminant().factor()
> (1404928) * d^6
What
On Jan 28, 5:02 am, Niles wrote:
> On Jan 28, 5:06 am, koffie wrote:
>
> > A real programmer could also help with spreading his knowledge of good
> > coding practices and software design patterns in the sage community.
>
> yes -- another one of my suggested ways a programmer could contribute
>
I don't have time to track this down at the moment, but as it is a bit
embarrassing I thought I'd report it here for now:
sage: R. = QQ[]
sage: E = EllipticCurve([0,0,0,-595*d^2,5586*d^3])
sage: E.discriminant().factor()
(1404928) * d^6
sage: 2^12*7^3
1404928
--
Robert L. Miller
http://www.rlm
Hello,
I am having trouble building sage 4.6.1 on an iMac8,1 (2.4 GHz Intel Core 2
Duo) running OS X 10.5.8. Below is the last relevant output from the
compilation. Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Jon
gcc -std=gnu99 -dynamiclib -Wl,-headerpad_max_install_names -undefined
dynamic_lookup
You're right. Let's decide on one and get it published quickly! Thanks
for making the page, it gives some perspective.
I don't know about the "how to contribute" page. It does give a lot of
information about contributing, but doesn't talk much about Sage. I
think anyone wanting to contribute would
Hi Paulo,
> 2011/1/27 François Bissey :
> > Hi all,
>
> I am delaying a Mandriva sagemath 4.6.1 due to related reasons,
> and may not release it if sagemath 4.6.2 is released soon :-). Since
> Mandriva cooker is using python 2.7.1 and cython 0.14, I needed to
> use a custom cython 0.13, but am
> I fear this thread is going nowhere. Let's publish one and start with
> the
> wiki etc. For development this was published
> recentlyhttp://www.liafa.jussieu.fr/~labbe/Sage/how-to-contribute/
I am sorry for "this thread is going no where", I obviously killed it,
which is a shame. What I wanted
2011/1/27 François Bissey :
> Hi all,
I am delaying a Mandriva sagemath 4.6.1 due to related reasons,
and may not release it if sagemath 4.6.2 is released soon :-). Since
Mandriva cooker is using python 2.7.1 and cython 0.14, I needed to
use a custom cython 0.13, but am trying to correct some is
On Jan 28, 6:18 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:14:49PM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> > Sometimes Richard can be helpful, and obviously knows quite a bit
> > about mathematical software. But for reasons known only to Richard,
> > he devotes a large proportion of hi
On 28 Jan., 13:27, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 28 Jan., 11:14, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>
> > Yep. It's sad when sometimes it's quicker to not cache non-trivial
> > computations.
>
> Indeed it was. Here is an example from the ticket:
> ...
> Hence, due to the optimisation of accessing t
On Jan 28, 5:06 am, koffie wrote:
> A real programmer could also help with spreading his knowledge of good
> coding practices and software design patterns in the sage community.
yes -- another one of my suggested ways a programmer could contribute
was going to be something like "check for naive
Hi Robert,
On 28 Jan., 11:14, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> Yep. It's sad when sometimes it's quicker to not cache non-trivial
> computations.
Indeed it was. Here is an example from the ticket:
Setting:
sage: class A:
: @cached_method
: def bar(self,x):
: return x
:
Hi Nicolas,
On 28 Jan., 11:02, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> There are several reasons to cache the results in x rather than in the
> method foo:
>
> (a) You don't need to calculate the hash of x to retrieve something
> from the cache; that can be important for large objects (with a
> cost
Hi Nicolas!
On 28 Jan., 11:41, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> Oh wow, I had completely missed all the activity on #8611!
Yes, indeed I think that most (all?) issues that are mentioned in this
thread are actually solved in #8611.
> Out of curiosity: does #8611 keep backward compatibility for the c
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:14:49PM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Sometimes Richard can be helpful, and obviously knows quite a bit
> about mathematical software. But for reasons known only to Richard,
> he devotes a large proportion of his time being negative, unhelpful
> and generally obnoxious
Dear Simon,
Oh wow, I had completely missed all the activity on #8611!
This issue had been such an itch since at least one year if not
two. Congrats for getting this done, and so nicely! Thanks to the
reviewers as well. I can't wait for 4.6.2 now!
You are my hero of the day :-)
Cheers,
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> Hi Simon!
>
> Sorry for my late answer; I missed this e-mail in the sage-devel flow ...
>
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:58:49AM -0800, Simon King wrote:
>> IMHO, the cached_... decorators are currently too slow. It seems to
>> me t
A real programmer could also help with spreading his knowledge of good
coding practices and software design patterns in the sage community.
By reading this mailing list I sometimes get the feeling we have
enough smart mathematicians, but not enough battle field tested
diehard programmers.
On Jan 2
Hi Simon!
Sorry for my late answer; I missed this e-mail in the sage-devel flow ...
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 10:58:49AM -0800, Simon King wrote:
> IMHO, the cached_... decorators are currently too slow. It seems to
> me that too much time is spent for looking up the cache (calling the
> m
Hi Simon!
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:17:09AM -0800, Simon King wrote:
> Anyway. My aim is to implement finite-dimensional quotients of path
> algebras as part of a project to compute modular cohomology rings of
> basic algebras.
Cool! That's a feature we will have a use for :-)
See also
Hello,
Let me propose that the patchbot would *only* look at the ticket
description and not comments to check for spkgs, patches, dependencies
and so on. I can see two major advantages:
1) People will be forced to write such information in the ticket
description where humans can also easily find
33 matches
Mail list logo
