See also
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/5af60a53b2618833/c5df88a9ce443f6e#c5df88a9ce443f6e
It is possible to get slashes, but you need a lot of them without any
clear pattern...
Andrey
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsu
Take a look at
sage.rings.number_field.number_field.NumberField_absolute._coerce_non_number_field_element_in
sage.rings.number_field.number_field_element.NumberFieldElement.__init__
(under if isinstance(f, pari_gen))
sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_integer_dense_flint.Polynomial_integer_dense_flin
Thanks evryone.. I already built sage with options make -i to ignore
errors. Build succesful and I can run sage. Sage is awesome.
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Mike wrote:
> I ran into the same problem. Try installing (in opensuse) the package
> readline-devel. This should provide the mis
On 2011-01-23 18:18, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Hello sage-devel,
>
> I am lost in coercion again. Can somebody please point out to me where
> to find the code which converts PARI objects to a NumberFieldElement.
> In other words, what happens in the third line below?
>
> sage: K. = NumberField(x^2
Okay, you are right. But the "nodetex" trick doesn't work in Cython.
So I guess this is a bug?
Jeroen.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this gr
>That's nice, although it would be good to mention something about the
>languages invovled. It's possible to make big contributions to Sage
>without knowing much or even caring about the mathematical software side
>of things. Can you work in something about Python, C, and Javascript?
>Maybe add in
Hi,
I'm planning to use sage notebook for a tutorial on numerical
techniques in economics. I would like to leave my students free to
choose the language they already know among octave, R and python .
When doing some preliminay work I noticed a difference in the way
interfaces for Octave or Matlab
Hi Jeroen,
> Unfortunately, that doesn't seem to work. It just literally adds the
> text "nodetex" to the docstring.
Really??
I get, for example:
sage: def foo():
: r"""nodetex
: the command ``\x" in gp
: """
: return
:
sage: foo?
Type: function
Ba
On Jan 23, 2011, at 4:24 PM, Tim Daly wrote:
> Advertising images target the emotions, not the intellect.
> What images bring strong emotional responses to mathematicians?
> Are Mandelbrot sets the leading edge of "cool"?
> For the Sage crowd wouldn't an elliptic curve be better?
>
> Tim Daly
Pe
On 2011-01-23 18:16, John H Palmieri wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean by "eat all backslashes", but maybe this
> does what you want:
What I mean is that I want an actual backslash to appear in the help
when the user does::
sage: a = pari(42)
sage: a.debug?
> def foo():
> r"
Hello sage-devel,
I am lost in coercion again. Can somebody please point out to me where
to find the code which converts PARI objects to a NumberFieldElement.
In other words, what happens in the third line below?
sage: K. = NumberField(x^2 + 5)
sage: b = pari("Mod(x+1, x^2+5)")
sage: K(b)
a + 1
On Jan 23, 7:19 am, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> It seems that docstrings eat all backslashes.
>
> I want to write in a docstring:
> like the ``\x`` command in gp
>
> Any clues on how to do this? (escaping with more backslashes doesn't
> seem to work)
I'm not sure what you mean by "eat all backslashes
Thank you very much Francois, much more explicit than I expected!!!
On Jan 23, 4:39 pm, Francois Maltey wrote:
> Dox a crit :
>
> > Hi guys! I have an easy question... got an expression with
> > exponentials, say exp(x)+exp(-x), How can I get the result in terms of
> > hyperbolic functions
>
> 1/
Dox a écrit :
Hi guys! I have an easy question... got an expression with
exponentials, say exp(x)+exp(-x), How can I get the result in terms of
hyperbolic functions
1/ First you can use the expr.subs method :
y=exp(x)+exp(-x)
y.subs(exp(x)==sinh(x)+cosh(x)).subs(exp(-x)=cosh(x)-sinh(x))
[You
Hi guys! I have an easy question... got an expression with
exponentials, say exp(x)+exp(-x), How can I get the result in terms of
hyperbolic functions?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@g
Advertising images target the emotions, not the intellect.
What images bring strong emotional responses to mathematicians?
Are Mandelbrot sets the leading edge of "cool"?
For the Sage crowd wouldn't an elliptic curve be better?
Tim Daly
On 1/23/2011 7:56 AM, Martin Albrecht wrote:
On Sunday 23
It seems that docstrings eat all backslashes.
I want to write in a docstring:
like the ``\x`` command in gp
Any clues on how to do this? (escaping with more backslashes doesn't
seem to work)
Thanks,
Jeroen.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
If not, we can remove it from Sage?...
It looks to be broken anyway.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/grou
On Sunday 23 January 2011, you wrote:
> Here is a basic design:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/48xqfm5
>
> Thoughts?
Hi, I like the general idea but would suggest a few optimisations design wise.
- I think the font isn't optimal. A sans serif font is a good choice I think
but I would play around with
I ran into the same problem. Try installing (in opensuse) the package
readline-devel. This should provide the missing headers.
On Jan 21, 7:18 pm, Bobby Kurniawan wrote:
> I recently joint this forum. I have trouble compiling sage-4.6.1 on SUSE.
> Laptop Intel Dual Core 2.1 GHz, OS Opensuse 11
20 matches
Mail list logo
