This afternoon, William gave me a really cool idea of starting up Sage
using fork(). Essentially you have one mothersage which forks off
copies of Sage. Like this, you can get an instant Sage prompt because
Sage is already started. I actually implemented this and it seems to
work (at least under
Same (broken) behavior here. Firefox on Ubuntu 10.04 with Javascript
enabled. Sage 4.6.1.alpha3.
Warning also results when I try the same search function at the Table
of Contents for the Reference Manual, so it seems systemic.
Rob
On Jan 14, 12:44 pm, John Thurber wrote:
> thoughts? Is this
I am aware of that's why I pasted it in there.
Why would you package something and label it with "Fedora13 release"
when it wasn't even linked with default libraries fedora comes with?
I am using what the package said it needs. The package either needs to
be fixed. Or someone should put a pre-req
the binary release you are using apparently needs
GLIBCXX_3.4.14, and you have an older version (GLIBCXX_3.4.13)
On Jan 13, 8:29 pm, asd1815 wrote:
> I am running Fedora 13 with all updates applied.
...
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
Sounds like you want to reinstall the spkg with sage -f -s (keep build) and
LDFLAGS=-g. Though that depends a bit on how broken the source build system
is.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubsc
For a discussion of practical fast polynomial multiplication,
see
http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~fateman/papers/dumbisfast.pdf
and also the first reference in that paper.
(As well as other references).
The code in GMP is likely to be well thought out.
You are probably making a major mistake setting
Is there any standard way to force .o (and .c) files be be installed
and available to the debugger
run by "sage -gdb" ?
Or at least any spkgs which have such an option built-in, from which
this can be lifted off?
Thanks,
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.co
Hi,
I've attached a patch to the ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1819
which moves mq.MPolynomialSystem to
sage.rings.polynomial.multi_polynomial_sequence as PolynomialSequence.
If someone has some time to spare to review this patch that'd be very much
appreciated since Al
I have rewritten the karatsuba algorithm for
Polynomial_generic_dense_field. The code needs some cleaning, but it
is already usable at #10255
My primary personal motivation is that, for number fields as base
rings, karatsuba performs worse than the generic multiplication. For
this concrete problem
Does anyone know of an example where a class __call__ method takes lists as
input? (With possible symbolic entries, of course.) I'm attempting to follow
the structure of Function_sec (and similar functions) but when I try
sage: var('x')
sage: theta([x,x^2,x^3])
I get the following error:
Trace
10 matches
Mail list logo
