On 11/05/2010 07:25 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 11/5/10 5:16 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
>> On 11/05/2010 07:49 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>>>
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/buildbot/binaries/
Does it usually take a long time (~1 hour) to make a dmg
distribution on
bsd.math, or
This may be related:
I also regularly (although not deterministically) have troubles with
ATLAS on a Turion x2 notebook. I has 4Gb RAM, but I am running Ubuntu
10.4 in VirtualBox with 1.5Gb and one CPU core accessible to it. It
always takes forever to build ATLAS on it and often it crashes. Since
On 11/05/2010 10:19 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Martin Albrecht
> wrote:
>> in the Sage library we cannot write the following C++ code:
>>
>> Class a = Class()
>>
>> since Cython turns the statement
>>
>> cdef Class a = Class()
>>
>> into
>>
>> Class a
>> a = C
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> in the Sage library we cannot write the following C++ code:
>
> Class a = Class()
>
> since Cython turns the statement
>
> cdef Class a = Class()
>
> into
>
> Class a
> a = Class()
>
> which only works when there is a copy
Hi there,
in the Sage library we cannot write the following C++ code:
Class a = Class()
since Cython turns the statement
cdef Class a = Class()
into
Class a
a = Class()
which only works when there is a copy constructor. In the Sage library we
sometimes use the follow construct in or
On 11/5/10 5:16 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 11/05/2010 07:49 AM, kcrisman wrote:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/buildbot/binaries/
Does it usually take a long time (~1 hour) to make a dmg distribution on
bsd.math, or more generally, on OS X?
It can take quite a while on a slower machin
You can try my new atlas spkg at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10226
if you have a minute.
SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH=HAMMER,SSE3,SSE2,SSE1
export SAGE_ATLAS_ARCH
sage -f atlas-3.8.3.p17.spkg
or just save the new spgk in SAGE_ROOT/spkg/standard/
Volker
--
To post to this group, send an email
On 11/ 5/10 05:38 PM, mhampton wrote:
Depending on what those Firefox tabs were, they could have put a
significant load on your CPU (Flash ads for example) or used enough
memory to make atlas work too hard. It would be interesting to know
if it works if you aren't running anything else.
What is
On 11/05/2010 07:49 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/buildbot/binaries/
>>
>> Does it usually take a long time (~1 hour) to make a dmg distribution on
>> bsd.math, or more generally, on OS X?
>
> It can take quite a while on a slower machine; I feel like bsd.math is
>
Well, I'm certainly under qualified to evaluate your thread (-:
It would SEEM that you were getting error messages that
said the flags to the compiler were wrong/inappropriate (GUESSING) ?
I got specific tune errors 2 and 255.
I'm not saying they don't have some common cause, just that the
symptoms
On 11/05/2010 11:23:01 AM, RegB wrote:
Thanks,
I have ads blocked, fairly sure that none were playing any U-tube or
other graphics,
no adobe flash.
Looking at System monitor, barely a Gig of memory is being used and
swap is NOT
being used at all. There is 4 Gig of ram.
CPU #2 is running at 100%
On 5 November 2010 18:48, nekopczynski wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
> I am currently a senior computer science student with a strong math
> background. One of my professors, Dana Ernst, also a member here,
> recommended that I post here. I am looking for a senior project
> involving programing, algo
Hello Everyone,
I am currently a senior computer science student with a strong math
background. One of my professors, Dana Ernst, also a member here,
recommended that I post here. I am looking for a senior project
involving programing, algorithms, parallel processing, and
mathematics. Does any k
Thanks,
I have ads blocked, fairly sure that none were playing any U-tube or
other graphics,
no adobe flash.
Looking at System monitor, barely a Gig of memory is being used and
swap is NOT
being used at all. There is 4 Gig of ram.
CPU #2 is running at 100% most of the time during the atlas build,
Depending on what those Firefox tabs were, they could have put a
significant load on your CPU (Flash ads for example) or used enough
memory to make atlas work too hard. It would be interesting to know
if it works if you aren't running anything else.
What is your processor and amount of RAM?
-M.
> Does the lack of availability of source code for a program mean it is
> unacceptable to publish the results of that program in a journal? I
> think not.
I know of at least one recent case where claimed improvements in
performance were due not to a new algorithm (as claimed by the
authors) but t
Minh already suggested gtk-recordmydesktop (in the other thread), but
I'd like to add that you don't need anything fancy to place video of
yourself on top of the screencast, you can just place a small window
with the video from the webcam above the browser.
For example, in debian or ubuntu, open "
WOW, that was quick - THANKS.
I reviewed all of those and while interesting/useful they seem to be
not applicable to this particular failure.
I had meant to say that on previous attempts I had discovered the need
for a fortran compiler and to disable cpu throttling. Also the
desirability of insta
On 11/ 5/10 12:47 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 11/5/10 1:25 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 11/ 4/10 11:38 PM, David Joyner wrote:
sage:
plot3d(sqrt(sin(x)*sin(y)),(x,-2*pi,2*pi),(y,-2*pi,2*pi),plot_points=750)
and
sage:
B=plot3d(sqrt(sin(x)*sin(y)),(x,-2*pi,2*pi),(y,-2*pi,2*pi),plot_points=750,
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:30 AM, RegB <2regburg...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> I know this is a modest laptop, but it seems to be in the tuning
> section that the Atlas install fails after 12 hours or so.
You might want to read this section of the Sage FAQ:
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/faq/faq-us
I know this is a modest laptop, but it seems to be in the tuning
section that the Atlas install fails after 12 hours or so.
Here is the last section (STAGE-2) of the install.log;
IN STAGE 2 INSTALL: TYPE-DEPENDENT TUNING
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/buildbot/binaries/
>
> Does it usually take a long time (~1 hour) to make a dmg distribution on
> bsd.math, or more generally, on OS X?
It can take quite a while on a slower machine; I feel like bsd.math is
fairly new, so it shouldn't take quite that long, b
On 11/5/10 1:25 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 11/ 4/10 11:38 PM, David Joyner wrote:
sage:
plot3d(sqrt(sin(x)*sin(y)),(x,-2*pi,2*pi),(y,-2*pi,2*pi),plot_points=750)
and
sage:
B=plot3d(sqrt(sin(x)*sin(y)),(x,-2*pi,2*pi),(y,-2*pi,2*pi),plot_points=750,viewer='tachyon')
sage: B.show()
look bet
On 11/01/2010 05:26 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 1 November 2010 22:23, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> On 2010-11-01 22:59, Mitesh Patel wrote:
>>> By the way, what is the best way to copy an entire [scratch-built] Sage
>>> distribution on Solaris? For example,
>>>
>>> cp -a sage-original-distribution
Hi Kwankyu,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> I think the
> article should be displayed in a holy place at the Sage website, as it
> seems to me the original source of the philosophy on which all this
> Sage project is founded.
Neubüser's article has been advertised for some t
Hi David,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 4:31 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> I must admit I was rather hoping there would be more similar
> references, ideally in peer reviewed journals, or books from decent
> publishers.
See the following interview of three Fields medalists, especially the
interview of Andr
Hello!
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 22:38:27 -0700 (PDT)
rjf wrote:
>
> Does the lack of availability of source code for a program mean it is
> unacceptable
> to publish the results of that program in a journal? I think not.
>
> Is it nice to release your program and data along with your article?
> Some
Hello everybody
To the current alpha0 has been merged #10043, which is a complete
rewrite of the LP interfaces... This is great, but I noticed 2
mistakes afterward : I had forgotten to rename the add_constraint
method to add_linear_constraint, and also that a parameter of the
"solve" method w
I reported it to the Singular list.
I hope that the interest of the Singular group on libSingular will
increase.
http://code.google.com/p/convex-singular/wiki/libSingular
Cheers,
Michael
On Nov 5, 10:36 am, François Bissey wrote:
> > Hi,
>
> > > I have toyed with singular-3.1.2 and tried to se
> Hi,
>
> > I have toyed with singular-3.1.2 and tried to see if it could work with
> > sage.
>
> nice, I meant to get around to it but never did.
>
> > The short story is that we should stay clear of it for a some time.
> > The singular executables are fine, the problems are with libsingular.
>
Hi,
> I have toyed with singular-3.1.2 and tried to see if it could work with
> sage.
nice, I meant to get around to it but never did.
> The short story is that we should stay clear of it for a some time.
> The singular executables are fine, the problems are with libsingular.
> The headers shipp
Hi all,
I have toyed with singular-3.1.2 and tried to see if it could work with
sage.
The short story is that we should stay clear of it for a some time.
The singular executables are fine, the problems are with libsingular.
The headers shipped for libsingular are currently completely broken,
this
On Nov 3, 8:59 am, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 05:30:55AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> > On 11/1/10 12:23 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > >http://sagemath.blogspot.com/2010/10/how-to-referee-sage-trac-tickets...
>
> > Nice. I'll have more comments later, bu
Hi David,
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> However, it might be worth remarking that the version of Splinx we use is
> 0.6.3, and the latest is 1.0.4, Updating might cure some of the issues, but
> others look firmly like bugs in the Sage documentation.
See ticket #10118
On 11/05/2010 03:05 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> On 11/ 5/10 07:41 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
>> On 11/05/2010 02:26 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>> I see this with 4.6 and 4.6.1.alpha0
>>>
>>> drkir...@hawk:~/sage-4.6$ grep WARN docpdf.log
>>> writing...
>>> /export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.6/devel/sage
On 11/ 5/10 07:41 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 11/05/2010 02:26 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I see this with 4.6 and 4.6.1.alpha0
drkir...@hawk:~/sage-4.6$ grep WARN docpdf.log
writing...
/export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.6/devel/sage/doc/en/faq/faq-usage.rst::
WARNING: unusable reference target found:
On 11/05/2010 02:26 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> I see this with 4.6 and 4.6.1.alpha0
>
> drkir...@hawk:~/sage-4.6$ grep WARN docpdf.log
> writing...
> /export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.6/devel/sage/doc/en/faq/faq-usage.rst::
> WARNING: unusable reference target found: about:plugins
> writing...
> /ex
I see this with 4.6 and 4.6.1.alpha0
drkir...@hawk:~/sage-4.6$ grep WARN docpdf.log
writing... /export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.6/devel/sage/doc/en/faq/faq-usage.rst::
WARNING: unusable reference target found: about:plugins
writing...
/export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.6/devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/introd
A bigger problem is that a program without source code available
becomes thing of the past faster than one wants.
Imagine Leonard Euler referring for his proofs to a computer running a
very old version of Ma*...
Even if he gave Ma* scripts for his computations, no modern computer
would be able to r
39 matches
Mail list logo
