[sage-devel] Re: 70M .cache/common-lisp

2010-10-30 Thread leif
On 31 Okt., 07:05, Jan Groenewald wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:01:49PM -0700, leif wrote: > > > mas...@host-56-150%du -sh .cache/* > > > 2.7M    .cache/album-art > > > 1.4M    .cache/banshee-1 > > > 572M    .cache/common-lisp > > > 8.0K    .cache/gedit > > > > so there's half a gigab

Re: [sage-devel] Re: 70M .cache/common-lisp

2010-10-30 Thread Jan Groenewald
Hi On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:01:49PM -0700, leif wrote: > > mas...@host-56-150%du -sh .cache/* > > 2.7M    .cache/album-art > > 1.4M    .cache/banshee-1 > > 572M    .cache/common-lisp > > 8.0K    .cache/gedit > > > > so there's half a gigabyte of junk in there (and my quota is only 5G > > so it m

[sage-devel] Re: 70M .cache/common-lisp

2010-10-30 Thread leif
On 29 Okt., 13:13, John Cremona wrote: > I have been hit by this too.  For the same reason:  my work desktop > has a networked (and backed up) home dir with limited space, but the > local disk has lots of space -- so I make ~/.cache a link to a dir on > the local disk and stopped getting warnings

[sage-devel] Re: Oh I wish Sage respected CC and CXX

2010-10-30 Thread leif
On 29 Okt., 06:37, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2010-Oct-28 02:31:19 -0700, Volker Braun wrote: > > >Making every 3rd party author adhere to the standard usage of CC/CXX > >is a bit like herding cats. It would be the cleanest fix to patch all > >the different build systems, sure. But wouldn't it be e

[sage-devel] Re: Can people try this readline package please

2010-10-30 Thread leif
On 28 Okt., 09:31, luisfe wrote: > Just a newby question about spkgs. sage already has readline. If I do > > ./sage > -fhttp://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/readline-6.1.spkg > > Will it replace the existing readline or will it make a parallel > installation? Good question. *Cur

[sage-devel] Re: Is it *really* necessary for everyone to download fortran.spkg ?

2010-10-30 Thread leif
On 28 Okt., 03:52, kcrisman wrote: > > The Sage packages that directly depend on Fortran are:  R, f2c, > > lapack, blas, numpy, scipy, cvxopt: > > > Note that numpy can be built and used *without* fortran, e.g., when I > > removed fortran from psage I kept numpy... > > So a non-Fortran Sage would

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ECL / Maxima / Fedora 14 issues.

2010-10-30 Thread Tim Daly
I experimented with using Amazon's cloud for (Axiom) builds. It is trivially easy to set up custom images that can be used for builds. It is also very cheap for an hour of CPU. So consider setting up a cloud buildbot. Tim Daly On 10/30/2010 1:30 PM, David Kirkby wrote: On 30 October 2010 07:17

Re: [sage-devel] Occasional doctest failure in libs/fplll/fplll.pyx with 4.6.rc0

2010-10-30 Thread Mitesh Patel
On 10/30/2010 06:09 PM, David Kirkby wrote: > On 30 October 2010 23:55, Mitesh Patel wrote: >> On 10/30/2010 05:35 PM, David Kirkby wrote: >>> On 30 October 2010 23:14, Mitesh Patel wrote: I ran ./sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/libs/fplll/fplll.pyx" 1000 times

Re: [sage-devel] Supported platforms - once again

2010-10-30 Thread Mitesh Patel
On 10/27/2010 08:26 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote: > On 10/27/2010 08:43 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: >> 1) Despite previously claiming in README.txt that we supported Fedora >> 32-bit on x86, the only host with Fedora 32-bit, >> >> http://build.sagemath.org/sage/buildslaves/cicero-1 >> >> has never had a

Re: [sage-devel] Occasional doctest failure in libs/fplll/fplll.pyx with 4.6.rc0

2010-10-30 Thread David Kirkby
On 30 October 2010 23:55, Mitesh Patel wrote: > On 10/30/2010 05:35 PM, David Kirkby wrote: >> On 30 October 2010 23:14, Mitesh Patel wrote: >>> I ran >>> >>> ./sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/libs/fplll/fplll.pyx" >>> >>> 1000 times in serial [1] with a 64-bit 4.6.rc0 built on OS X 10.

Re: [sage-devel] Occasional doctest failure in libs/fplll/fplll.pyx with 4.6.rc0

2010-10-30 Thread Mitesh Patel
On 10/30/2010 05:35 PM, David Kirkby wrote: > On 30 October 2010 23:14, Mitesh Patel wrote: >> I ran >> >> ./sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/libs/fplll/fplll.pyx" >> >> 1000 times in serial [1] with a 64-bit 4.6.rc0 built on OS X 10.6 >> (bsd.math). All but one of the runs pass. The fa

[sage-devel] Re: Output format for find_fit and solve

2010-10-30 Thread Jason Grout
On 10/30/10 10:20 AM, Oscar Lazo wrote: Making solution_dict the default seems apropiate for find_fit and solve. I still would prefer a symbolic result for find_fit though (at least an option to get that). Usually when one fits some data to a model what one is trying to do is to interpolate d

Re: [sage-devel] Occasional doctest failure in libs/fplll/fplll.pyx with 4.6.rc0

2010-10-30 Thread David Kirkby
On 30 October 2010 23:14, Mitesh Patel wrote: > I ran > > ./sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/libs/fplll/fplll.pyx" > > 1000 times in serial [1] with a 64-bit 4.6.rc0 built on OS X 10.6 > (bsd.math).  All but one of the runs pass.  The failure: > > Run 766 of 1000 > Detected SAGE64 flag >

[sage-devel] Occasional doctest failure in libs/fplll/fplll.pyx with 4.6.rc0

2010-10-30 Thread Mitesh Patel
I ran ./sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/libs/fplll/fplll.pyx" 1000 times in serial [1] with a 64-bit 4.6.rc0 built on OS X 10.6 (bsd.math). All but one of the runs pass. The failure: Run 766 of 1000 Detected SAGE64 flag Building Sage on OS X in 64-bit mode sage -t -long -force_lib "d

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Is some idiot attaching junk to the Wiki?

2010-10-30 Thread David Kirkby
On 28 October 2010 11:49, Volker Braun wrote: > Spammers.. Evidently the wiki captcha is not difficult enough ;-) There may be anti-spam tools for MoinMoin - I know there is if Trac was used as a Wiki http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracWiki dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-

Re: [sage-devel] CouchDB

2010-10-30 Thread William Stein
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:13 AM, Thierry Dumont wrote: > I am reading  an interesting paper (at least interesting for me) about > CouchDB. I do not know many things about databases, but I remember that > there where some ideas about using a data base for the storages of the > notebook. > At first

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Request to review Sagemath Beginners Guide

2010-10-30 Thread Simon King
Hi! On 30 Okt., 03:22, William Stein wrote: > Hi Sage-Devel, > > I'm curious if people are getting emails like this... Yes, I got such email. Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsub

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ECL / Maxima / Fedora 14 issues.

2010-10-30 Thread Mike Witt
On 10/30/2010 10:30:07 AM, David Kirkby wrote: On 30 October 2010 07:17, Mike Witt wrote: > On Oct 29, 6:48 pm, Mike Witt wrote: >> I don't suppose there's a way I can initiate the "buildbot" >> from my end and have the results go to the right place? >> >> Once I get time to install Fedora 14,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ECL / Maxima / Fedora 14 issues.

2010-10-30 Thread David Kirkby
On 30 October 2010 07:17, Mike Witt wrote: > On Oct 29, 6:48 pm, Mike Witt wrote: >> I don't suppose there's a way I can initiate the "buildbot" >> from my end and have the results go to the right place? >> >> Once I get time to install Fedora 14, I imagine I could at least >> make that system av

[sage-devel] Re: Output format for find_fit and solve

2010-10-30 Thread Oscar Lazo
On Oct 30, 2:26 am, Jason Grout wrote: > On 10/29/10 5:59 PM, Oscar Gerardo Lazo Arjona wrote: > > > > > I want to propose the following changes to the output format of find_fit > > and solve: > > > for find_fit the current output format is a list of equations: > > > sage: data = [(i, 1.2 * sin(

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Request to review Sagemath Beginners Guide

2010-10-30 Thread Thierry Dumont
Le 30/10/2010 16:21, mhampton a écrit : Rob, It would be great to have an English version of that book, I agree that its very good. I would be willing to pitch in a bit to a team translation effort. My French is not good but I think I could slog through part of it - other people in my family m

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Request to review Sagemath Beginners Guide

2010-10-30 Thread mhampton
Rob, It would be great to have an English version of that book, I agree that its very good. I would be willing to pitch in a bit to a team translation effort. My French is not good but I think I could slog through part of it - other people in my family might check my work if I can talk them into

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Request to review Sagemath Beginners Guide

2010-10-30 Thread John Cremona
With a few (preferably native English-speaking) people collaborating, translating the French book would not be at all hard. Paul, would you be willing to coordinate a little project to do that? We could divide the book up into sections and get volunteers to work on each section (one or more each)

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Request to review Sagemath Beginners Guide

2010-10-30 Thread mhampton
On Oct 29, 9:08 pm, David Kirkby wrote: > I think Sage would gain a bit more creditability if there were books > on it published from places like Springer or Wiley. > > Good luck to anyone that has written a book on Sage. > > Dave David Joyner and I are working on a book for introductory differ

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ECL - test suite and spkg-check file

2010-10-30 Thread John Cremona
I agree that if self-tests exist then we should enable them (when SAGE_CHECK=yes). John On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On 10/30/10 12:57 AM, Volker Braun wrote: >> >> I'm definitely in favor of adding ecl's test suite. Assuming that ecl >> actually passes its self-tes

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Google code: copy of the Sage source repository

2010-10-30 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Leif, On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 3:15 PM, leif wrote: > P.S.: Perhaps also add an example of how to change the editor to > the .hgrc template, since 'vi[m]' seems to be the default on many > systems, but apparently many people aren't familiar with such an > editor. Ticket #10190 [1] addresses th

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Request to review Sagemath Beginners Guide

2010-10-30 Thread Thierry Dumont
Le 30/10/2010 12:39, Rob Beezer a écrit : > There's already a nice CC-licensed book about Sage written in French: http://sagebook.gforge.inria.fr/ Are there any plans to make a print version and/or translations? I have "translated" the French Sage book into Sage worksheets. This was

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Request to review Sagemath Beginners Guide

2010-10-30 Thread Rob Beezer
> There's already a nice CC-licensed book about Sage written in French: > >    http://sagebook.gforge.inria.fr/ > > Are there any plans to make a print version and/or translations? I have "translated" the French Sage book into Sage worksheets. This was all very experimental and a bit "quick and

[sage-devel] Getting started with Sage development

2010-10-30 Thread Rob Beezer
I've just finished a one-week, daily seminar on getting started with Sage development, designed for students here at AIMS [1]. Installing from source, editing source, making/applying/managing patches, and Sage "community processes." If you've been thinking about getting involved, but not sure how

[sage-devel] Re: Fwd: Request to review Sagemath Beginners Guide

2010-10-30 Thread Jason Grout
On 10/30/10 4:07 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote: Hi William, On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM, William Stein wrote: Hi Sage-Devel, I'm curious if people are getting emails like this... First, a confession on my part. I received such an email in the last 24 hours, asking me to be a reviewer of the pro

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: Request to review Sagemath Beginners Guide

2010-10-30 Thread Mitesh Patel
On 10/29/2010 09:08 PM, David Kirkby wrote: > On 30 October 2010 02:22, William Stein wrote: >> Hi Sage-Devel, >> I'm curious if people are getting emails like this... >> (I don't have anything to do with this PacktPub project. Generally, I think >> it is best for people to write documentation fo

Re: [sage-devel] Fwd: Request to review Sagemath Beginners Guide

2010-10-30 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi William, On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:22 PM, William Stein wrote: > Hi Sage-Devel, > I'm curious if people are getting emails like this... First, a confession on my part. I received such an email in the last 24 hours, asking me to be a reviewer of the proposed book on Sage. I have read through

Re: [sage-devel] Cellular Automata Tools

2010-10-30 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Hypercube wrote: > Hello, > > I am thinking of writing a Cellular Automata module for Sage, similar > to the one in Mathematica: > > http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/CellularAutomaton.html In mid-2008, someone was working on a cellular automata p

[sage-devel] Re: Output format for find_fit and solve

2010-10-30 Thread Jason Grout
On 10/29/10 5:59 PM, Oscar Gerardo Lazo Arjona wrote: I want to propose the following changes to the output format of find_fit and solve: for find_fit the current output format is a list of equations: sage: data = [(i, 1.2 * sin(0.5*i-0.2) + 0.1 * normalvariate(0, 1)) for i in xsrange(0, 4*pi,

[sage-devel] Cellular Automata Tools

2010-10-30 Thread Hypercube
Hello, I am thinking of writing a Cellular Automata module for Sage, similar to the one in Mathematica: http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/CellularAutomaton.html Possibly also with some analysis tools, like entropy, etc. Assuming it was of good quality, could it be implemented? I would

[sage-devel] CouchDB

2010-10-30 Thread Thierry Dumont
I am reading an interesting paper (at least interesting for me) about CouchDB. I do not know many things about databases, but I remember that there where some ideas about using a data base for the storages of the notebook. At first look, I would say that these sorts of databases (not sql) seem