[sage-devel] Re: Sage's C/C++ libraries

2010-10-05 Thread AndyNovo
We do some pretty cool optimizations for the ranges that impact polynomial factorization. Namely I do everything possible to always get away with double precision in the floating-point parts, a lot of this is new mathematically as we're really creating alternative paths to reduced bases which are

[sage-devel] Re: Sage mailing lists

2010-10-05 Thread koffie
And don't forget the sage-flame list ;) http://groups.google.com/group/sage-flame On Oct 6, 5:00 am, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi Mitesh, > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote: > > Have I missed any? > > The group debian-sage [1] seems to be reviving lately. Recent > discussions (i

[sage-devel] Re: Help getting started with Hopf algebras in Sage

2010-10-05 Thread jvkersch
Hi Niles, Like John, I would like to be cc'd on any tickets about this. Apart from the obvious mathematical importance, I'm quite interested in finding out the right way of implementing these structures. I don't know if I'll be able to contribute immediately, but I'm looking forward to seeing ho

Re: [sage-devel] Sage mailing lists

2010-10-05 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Mitesh, On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote: > Have I missed any? The group debian-sage [1] seems to be reviving lately. Recent discussions (in the last few days) have been about fixing the packaging of Sage in Debian. There's also sagemath-users [2]. It's not "active", but sh

Re: [sage-devel] Where is the source for sage.matrix.matrix_modn_sparse.Matrix_modn_sparse.__eq__?

2010-10-05 Thread François Bissey
> I would like to see the source code of > sage.matrix.matrix_modn_sparse.Matrix_modn_sparse.__eq__(), but I have > no idea where to look. The following doesn't work:: > > sage: L1 = matrix(GF(43), 3, 3, range(9), sparse=True) > sage: L1.__eq__?? > Error getting source: arg is not a module, class

[sage-devel] Sage mailing lists

2010-10-05 Thread Mitesh Patel
Is there a complete list of "active" public Sage mailing lists at sagemath.org or the Sage wiki? I'm aware of sage-algebra http://groups.google.com/group/sage-algebra sage-announce http://groups.google.com/group/sage-announce sage-combinat-devel http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel

[sage-devel] Re: Help getting started with Hopf algebras in Sage

2010-10-05 Thread John H Palmieri
On Oct 5, 2:41 pm, Niles wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm interested in implementing some computational algebraic topology > using Hopf algebroids.  As a warm-up, I thought I would see what > functionality exists in Sage for coalgebras, comodules, Hopf algebras, > etc.  What currently exists seems to b

[sage-devel] Help getting started with Hopf algebras in Sage

2010-10-05 Thread Niles
Hello all, I'm interested in implementing some computational algebraic topology using Hopf algebroids. As a warm-up, I thought I would see what functionality exists in Sage for coalgebras, comodules, Hopf algebras, etc. What currently exists seems to be placeholder categories (e.g. [1], [2]), an

[sage-devel] Where is the source for sage.matrix.matrix_modn_sparse.Matrix_modn_sparse.__eq__?

2010-10-05 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
I would like to see the source code of sage.matrix.matrix_modn_sparse.Matrix_modn_sparse.__eq__(), but I have no idea where to look. The following doesn't work:: sage: L1 = matrix(GF(43), 3, 3, range(9), sparse=True) sage: L1.__eq__?? Error getting source: arg is not a module, class, method, func

[sage-devel] Re: [debian-sage] Sympy version 0.6.7: issues with upgrading?

2010-10-05 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:22 AM, cjfsyntropy wrote: > Sage currently ships v. 0.6.4 of sympy > (http://www.sagemath.org/packages/standard/sympy-0.6.4.p0.txt). > > I found the hint below in another thread.  But what are the issues > with > upgrading sympy to v. 0.6.7?  I could not find a ticket in

[sage-devel] Re: Sage's C/C++ libraries

2010-10-05 Thread Bill Hart
Difficult question. The difficulty is that it uses FLINT matrices. Otherwise the answer would probably be yes, I think. But I'll check with Andy Novocin on that. He is more aware of how the performance will compare for wider classes of problems than the ones we've been specifically attacking. Bill

Re: [sage-devel] segfault while running sage

2010-10-05 Thread Burcin Erocal
Hi Johannes, On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:54:29 +0200 Johannes wrote: > using Sage Version 4.5.3, Release Date: 2010-09-04 > > running sage -gdb leads to this: > > sage: filter(lambda x: all([item.denominator()._cmp_(1) for item in > x]), [[coordinate.subs(c=0).subs(b=0) for coordinate in item] fo

[sage-devel] Re: German translation of the tutorial / Übersetzung des Tutorials in Deutsch

2010-10-05 Thread maldun
When I find some time this weekend, I can do some proofreading. Hope you get along with austrian german as well ;-) greez, maldun On Oct 5, 12:10 am, Philipp Schneider wrote: >  Dear Sage community, > > Michael Mardaus and I are happy to announce that we have finished > translating the complete

[sage-devel] segfault while running sage

2010-10-05 Thread Johannes
Hi, i just got my sage crashed with theis following command sage: filter(lambda x: all([item.denominator()._cmp_(1) for item in x]), [[coordinate.subs(c=0).subs(b=0) for coordinate in item] for item in wi ]) Unhandled SIGSEGV: A segme

[sage-devel] Re: German translation of the tutorial / Übersetzung des Tutorials in Deutsch

2010-10-05 Thread maldun
When I find some time this weekend I will make a little bit proofreading. greez, maldun On Oct 5, 12:10 am, Philipp Schneider wrote: >  Dear Sage community, > > Michael Mardaus and I are happy to announce that we have finished > translating the complete Sage tutorial to German. > > Now we need t

[sage-devel] Re: Decorators degrading documentation

2010-10-05 Thread jason-sage
On 10/5/10 6:48 AM, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: On Sep 23, 2:57 pm, Jason Grout wrote: On 9/23/10 7:13 AM, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: Hi I find the generic version of the function definitions less than satisfactory. I'd guess it would be had to make Sphinx pickup the more detailed info i

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [debian-sage] building a Sage package on Debian

2010-10-05 Thread CJ Fearnley
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:26:39PM -0700, Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM, CJ Fearnley wrote: > > > > Sympy is only OK (for Sage) up to version 0.6.6.  0.6.7 in sid will break > > (note from François Bissey). > > It's some problem in Sage vs sympy and it should probably be f

[sage-devel] Re: Decorators degrading documentation

2010-10-05 Thread Johan S. R. Nielsen
On Sep 23, 2:57 pm, Jason Grout wrote: > On 9/23/10 7:13 AM, Johan S. R. Nielsen wrote: > > > > > Hi > > >> I find the generic version of the function definitions less than > >> satisfactory.  I'd guess it would be had to make Sphinx pickup the > >> more detailed info in these situations?  I'd als

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage's C/C++ libraries

2010-10-05 Thread Martin Albrecht
On Tuesday 05 October 2010, Bill Hart wrote: > I also think the bit about Magma using an old fpLLL may be out-of- > date. Damien Stehle recently did quite a bit of work for the Magma > group. I'm not 100% sure it's been updated in the latest released > Magma, but I would be surprised to find it had

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-support] German translation o f the tutorial / Übersetzung des Tutorials in Deutsch

2010-10-05 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi, 2010/10/5 Philipp Schneider : >  Dear Sage community, > > Michael Mardaus and I are happy to announce that we have finished > translating the complete Sage tutorial to German. Your contribution to the world-wide Sage community is simply awesome! Thank you very much! > Now we need the help o

[sage-devel] Re: Sage's C/C++ libraries

2010-10-05 Thread Bill Hart
I also think the bit about Magma using an old fpLLL may be out-of- date. Damien Stehle recently did quite a bit of work for the Magma group. I'm not 100% sure it's been updated in the latest released Magma, but I would be surprised to find it hadn't been. Not to worry though, Damien has been a gre

[sage-devel] Re: Sage's C/C++ libraries

2010-10-05 Thread Bill Hart
Just a minor correction. Paul Zimmermann's name is misspelled. On 5 Oct, 00:48, William Stein wrote: > Hi Sage-Devel, > > "Every copy of Sage includes many free open source C/C++ libraries, > which can also be used standalone without Sage. They got into Sage > because enough people really cared a