On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 at 04:48PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> "Every copy of Sage includes many free open source C/C++ libraries,
> which can also be used standalone without Sage. They got into Sage
[snip]
> extremely fast, often potentially orders of magnitude faster than what
> they might implemen
On 10/4/10 6:48 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
"Every copy of Sage includes many free open source C/C++ libraries,
which can also be used standalone without Sage. They got into Sage
because enough people really cared about using them, and felt it was
worth the effort to convince other p
Hi Sage-Devel,
"Every copy of Sage includes many free open source C/C++ libraries,
which can also be used standalone without Sage. They got into Sage
because enough people really cared about using them, and felt it was
worth the effort to convince other people that these should be
included in Sage
Dear Sage community,
Michael Mardaus and I are happy to announce that we have finished
translating the complete Sage tutorial to German.
Now we need the help of as many German speaking users as possible to
proofread our translation.
If you happen to belong to this group and have some minutes to
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:34 AM, CJ Fearnley wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 06:04:22PM +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
>> Hi CJ, thanks for bringing this issue up again and for the summary.
>>
>> Il 01/10/2010 02:22, CJ Fearnley ha scritto:
>> > * Scipy 0.6.7, which is in sid (Debian's devel
One disadvantage of this system is that it makes it harder to report
problems back to the pari developers since we cannot just say "with
svn # there is this problem...". We have to give the base svn
number + a list of individual other things.
It's really important right now that we do not let
On 2010-10-04 12:22, John Cremona wrote:
> One disadvantage of this system is that it makes it harder to report
> problems back to the pari developers since we cannot just say "with
> svn # there is this problem...". We have to give the base svn
> number + a list of individual other things.
W
On 2010-10-04 11:41, François Bissey wrote:
> Well someone screwed up with that in #9876.
If someone screwed up, that someone must be me :-)
On 2010-10-04 10:37, John Cremona wrote:
> According to the pari SVN logs, the change was pade at revision 12605:
>
> http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bi
> On 2010-10-04 11:41, François Bissey wrote:
> > Well someone screwed up with that in #9876.
>
> If someone screwed up, that someone must be me :-)
>
> On 2010-10-04 10:37, John Cremona wrote:
> > According to the pari SVN logs, the change was pade at revision 12605:
> >
> > http://pari.math.u-
> According to the pari SVN logs, the change was pade at revision 12605:
>
> http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=pari&revis
> ion=12605
>
> while the spkg name pari-2.4.3.svn-12577.p7 suggests that we ship
> 12577, i.e. before that patch.
>
> Here we appreciate the p
According to the pari SVN logs, the change was pade at revision 12605:
http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi?view=rev&root=pari&revision=12605
while the spkg name pari-2.4.3.svn-12577.p7 suggests that we ship
12577, i.e. before that patch.
Here we appreciate the point made by David
> Hi all,
>
> I am a bit puzzled by something I noticed while looking at problem
> with sage -t -long -force_lib "devel/sage/sage/tests/parigp.py"
> in sage-on-gentoo and followed the upstream thread
> (http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079)
> We include the patch for iss
12 matches
Mail list logo
