On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
> On 08/11/2010 03:25 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
>> On 08/05/2010 11:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 08/04/2010 03:10 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> So it looks like you're getting se
On 08/11/2010 05:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
>> On 08/10/2010 04:35 AM, Kutoma Ltd wrote:
>>> Thanks for any clarification.Also maybe a other question.Is someone
>>> working on any Interop between Sage and Haskell.
>>
>> I'm not aware of any o
On 08/11/2010 03:25 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
> On 08/05/2010 11:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
>>> On 08/04/2010 03:10 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
So it looks like you're getting segfaults all over the place as
well... Hmm... Could you
I've just got a message from the Sage nagbot, which made me bring this up.
Does anyone have any comments on #4446?
It's outside my maths knowledge, but I've taken some time to review bits of
this. The ticket has been open 21 months, and a lot of people have put a lot of
work into it.
Dave
-
On 08/11/10 11:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 08/10/2010 04:35 AM, Kutoma Ltd wrote:
Thanks for any clarification.Also maybe a other question.Is someone
working on any Interop between Sage and Haskell.
I'm not aware of any ongoing projects
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
> On 08/10/2010 04:35 AM, Kutoma Ltd wrote:
>> Thanks for any clarification.Also maybe a other question.Is someone
>> working on any Interop between Sage and Haskell.
>
> I'm not aware of any ongoing projects to bridge Sage (or Python) and
> Has
On 08/10/2010 04:35 AM, Kutoma Ltd wrote:
> Thanks for any clarification.Also maybe a other question.Is someone
> working on any Interop between Sage and Haskell.
I'm not aware of any ongoing projects to bridge Sage (or Python) and
Haskell. I'd be happy to be corrected!
I "found" this sage-devel
Hi Sergey,
Thanks for the pointer to ALGLIB - I'd seen it discussed but hadn't
investigated.
We've pretty much been targeting QQ (maybe really ZZ) since the idea
is to make examples/problems for an introductory course without a
numerical component. Where we can drop-in an a general exact ring
in
Thanks for answering the call, David. Much appreciated. I suspect
you'll find the routines useful this fall, and especially if we get
around to building interacts as front-ends in the waning weeks.
Rob
On Aug 11, 4:07 am, David Joyner wrote:
> Since I'm teaching a linear algebra class this sem
That's funny -- I just spent 5 days on holiday with my old friend Neil
Immerman, who won the Godel Prize in 1995 for proving NL = co-NL,. I
don't think that he mentioned the P=NP thing once. And then I get
back online and find that sage-devel is buzzing with it!
John
On Aug 11, 3:10 am, Bill Ha
On 08/11/10 04:43 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Aug 11, 8:24 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
For the first time today I build a 32-bit version of Sage on OpenSolaris.
This was 4.5.3.alpha0 on my Sun Ultra 27. (I've tried 64-bit OpenSolaris before,
with minimal success, though I can build it). A
Axiom solves this problem by separating the category
information from the specific domain information.
Thus you can have a categorical implementation that works for
every domain in the category but you can supply a specific
implementation for a given domain.
So a dense matrix and a sparse matrix
On Aug 11, 8:24 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> For the first time today I build a 32-bit version of Sage on OpenSolaris.
>
> This was 4.5.3.alpha0 on my Sun Ultra 27. (I've tried 64-bit OpenSolaris
> before,
> with minimal success, though I can build it). A 64-bit build is just too
> unstable,
For the first time today I build a 32-bit version of Sage on OpenSolaris.
This was 4.5.3.alpha0 on my Sun Ultra 27. (I've tried 64-bit OpenSolaris before,
with minimal success, though I can build it). A 64-bit build is just too
unstable, but a 32-bit one is more usable.
I added the following
Damn you, Refresh-button! Is there a way to delete such a duplicate
post?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com
Hi Ryan
It seems that we are in agreement with most thing so far then :-)
I just realised, however, a new problem with the whole encoder-decoder
solution. Many such algorithms will want to take various options (like
decoding bound, list size and multiplicity in the Guruswami-Sudan
case), which wou
Hi Ryan
It seems that we are in agreement with most thing so far then :-)
I just realised, however, a new problem with the whole encoder-decoder
solution. Many such algorithms will want to take various options (like
decoding bound, list size and multiplicity in the Guruswami-Sudan
case), which wou
On Aug 11, 1:28 pm, koffie wrote:
> Hej Johan,
>
> It indeed seems to be at the core of a wider problem. The core of the
> problem seems that sometimes you can represent various objects in
> different ways.
>
> - So in the coding theory example you can represent a general linear
> code by a genera
Hej Johan,
It indeed seems to be at the core of a wider problem. The core of the
problem seems that sometimes you can represent various objects in
different ways.
- So in the coding theory example you can represent a general linear
code by a generator matrix. While you can represent a cyclic line
Since I'm teaching a linear algebra class this semester, I'll bite.
Applies fine to 4.5.2.rc0.
Two extremely minor comments off the top of my head, but I'll make
them on the ticket.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Sage Devlopers,
>
> I have an undergraduate student who is f
On 08/11/10 11:37 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
On 10 August 2010 10:35, Kutoma Ltd wrote:
Hello to everyone,
Just downloaded the latest source tar file for SAGE ( 4.5.2) inclusive
the README.
Hope someone can advise a bit more about the follow statements
written.
x86_64 OpenSolaris (64-bit) -- n
On 10 August 2010 10:35, Kutoma Ltd wrote:
> Hello to everyone,
>
> Just downloaded the latest source tar file for SAGE ( 4.5.2) inclusive
> the README.
> Hope someone can advise a bit more about the follow statements
> written.
>
> x86_64 OpenSolaris (64-bit) -- not officialy supported,but near
I actually think that the part of the discussion relating to
inheritance and scalability is quite fundamental for the structuring
of Sage. The problem is -- at its core -- that we have an object
which, in object-oriented eyes, _is_ a RingElement but we want to call
the computationally efficient imp
On 08/05/2010 11:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
>> On 08/04/2010 03:10 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 07/30/2010 01:54 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
> So we're currently working on a lon
24 matches
Mail list logo
