On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 at 10:28PM -0700, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > When building from source, I can set MAKE and have the Sage library
> > build in parallel. Is there a way I can do the same thing when using
> > "sage -b"? In analogy
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> When building from source, I can set MAKE and have the Sage library
> build in parallel. Is there a way I can do the same thing when using
> "sage -b"? In analogy to "sage -t" and "sage -tp", it would be nice to
> have "sage -bp".
Hello all,
When building from source, I can set MAKE and have the Sage library
build in parallel. Is there a way I can do the same thing when using
"sage -b"? In analogy to "sage -t" and "sage -tp", it would be nice to
have "sage -bp".
Dan
--
--- Dan Drake
- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~dra
On Jul 20, 5:17 pm, Volker Braun wrote:
> On Jul 20, 6:51 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> > [...] if in the
> > future a particular department got a reputation for exploiting its
> > post-docs, it would have a harder time hiring people. Word gets
> > around pretty fast.
>
> I would like to shoot
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 5:43 AM, dagss wrote:
> On Jul 11, 12:20 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> 2. Sage at EuroScipy:
>>
>> Another thing -- though most talks mention Cython, not one single talk
>> given about actual engineers/scientists doing work even mentioned Sage
>> -- and there were over 30 ta
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
> Somewhat related to this subject - is it possible to automatically put
> into documentation parameters that were defined and documented in the
> "base method'? E.g. if I have
You could make a decorator which modifies B.f.__doc__ by inse
Somewhat related to this subject - is it possible to automatically put
into documentation parameters that were defined and documented in the
"base method'? E.g. if I have
class A():
def f(self, a=1):
"""
INPUT:
- ``a`` -- integer
"""
...
class B(A):
def f(self, b=2, *args, **
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:43 AM, 3DRaven <3dra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. I do not speak English.
> I use a translator of Google.
> Why unpacking: sage-4.5-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-
> Linux.tar.lzma
> I get the message about the impossibility of creating hard links?
I just checked the fi
On Jul 20, 6:51 pm, John H Palmieri wrote:
> [...] if in the
> future a particular department got a reputation for exploiting its
> post-docs, it would have a harder time hiring people. Word gets
> around pretty fast.
I would like to shoot down your blind faith in market efficiency :-)
http://w
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Marco Streng wrote:
> I have a question that I thought was a simple python question, but I was
> unable to find the answer on the internet.
>
> Suppose I want to find out if "root" is a valid keyword argument for the
> "is_square" function of an object "a". Is ther
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Vincent D <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jmodelica seems to be very interesting... but from
> http://www.jmodelica.org/page/14
> (or see the copy below) they argue that the software is their property
> (is that a problem for inclusion in Sage?). On the other
Hi,
I have a question that I thought was a simple python question, but I was
unable to find the answer on the internet.
Suppose I want to find out if "root" is a valid keyword argument for the
"is_square" function of an object "a". Is there a good way to do this?
I tried the following for I
Hi!
On 20 Jul., 23:46, Vincent D <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> * You assign and transfer the copyright of your JModelica.org
> contribution to the Project owner to the extent permitted by
> applicable law. In return you receive back a broad license to re-use
> and distribute your
On Jul 20, 1:58 pm, rjf wrote:
> The issue to me is the extent to which a person in such a position is
> unfairly exploited.
Right. As kcrisman says, this doesn't happen that much in math: we
don't have tasks like sequencing DNA or building circuit boards that
we can foist off on post-docs or
> The issue to me is the extent to which a person in such a position is
> unfairly exploited. Of course
Other posters are correct that in mathematics any short-term position
with a 2-2 or less load is usually considered a postdoc of sorts
(though at an elite liberal arts college it may be a visi
Jmodelica seems to be very interesting... but from
http://www.jmodelica.org/page/14
(or see the copy below) they argue that the software is their property
(is that a problem for inclusion in Sage?). On the other hand very few
is said about the user license "The code base is provided under
standard
Unfortunately, I have no log of this. I think that what we did was to
make it run under the sage -sh shell, so that it was possible to do
"from sage import *" at the beginning of any python file and achieving
something pretty usable.
Sorry for missing details
Maurizio
On 18 Lug, 02:29, "Nicolas M
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:58 PM, rjf wrote:
> A computer science postdoc would typically be purely research funded.
This is an ad for a math postdoc.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@g
A computer science postdoc would typically be purely research funded.
Any teaching would be optional.
There are lecturer/ instructor positions with low teaching
requirements (for lecturers) that are intended to
fund young people so they can do research. There used to be (maybe no
longer) Miller as
In a previous discussion, OpenModelica was considered as a new Sage
addition, but was dropped because their license is apparently
incompatible with GPL.
However, JModelica seems like a viable alternative. Please see the
following excerpt from a private correspondence between me and
William:
> Tha
On 07/20/10 07:42 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2010-Jul-19 23:20:40 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
So if I understand you correctly,
SAGE_NUM_THREADS=10
would set 10 threads globally in Sage, but
SAGE_NUM_THREADS_ATLAS=1
would override the 10 to 1 (single threaded) for just ATLAS. Have I
On 2010-Jul-19 23:20:40 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
>> How about an extension to the standard environment variable parsing
>> so that SAGE_FOO_bar is equivalent to (and overrides) SAGE_FOO in
>> package 'bar' only? This allows variables to be overridden for
>> specific packages without havi
Hello,
I did write two almost complete patches for hyperbolic geometry
(#9439) and plotting fundamental domains of subgroups of PSL(2,Z)
(#9557). I'm not so interested in plotting fundamental domains of the
standard congruence groups but it would be very nice to put all that
in a generic framework
On Jul 17, 8:18 pm, rjf wrote:
> I wouldn't call this a postdoc. It is non-tenure track position that
> requires teaching. The blurb doesn't mention
> how much teaching or how much money. Actually, the ad doesn't call it
> a postdoc either.
> RJF
Whatever the position is officially called (in t
That's relief -- thanks. I think my mind is frying, as it is hot &
humid (well, by English standards). Now I see what is happening. It
is easy to get confused since under the src/ directorythere is another
one called src, so some of the targets for cp do start src
John
On 20 July 2010 17:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:08 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> Amazing discovery -- the script spkg-install is VERY broken, even the one
> currently distributed with sage 4.5! (pari-2.3.5.p1)
>
> There are several lines like
> {{{
> # pjeremy: fix for FreeBSD: #7825
> cp "$TOP"/patches/get_kernel co
The following came to light while woring on #9343 (pari upgrade) which
I thought deserved a wider circulation. John
Amazing discovery -- the script spkg-install is VERY broken, even the one
currently distributed with sage 4.5! (pari-2.3.5.p1)
There are several lines like
{{{
# pjeremy: fix
On 20 July 2010 16:24, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>> I am having trouble with sage -pkg to make a new spkg from a directory
>> my-spkg/. (I have done this before). Am I doing something stupid?
>>
>> After typing
>>
>> sage -pkg my-spkg
>>
>> nothing
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:37 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> I am having trouble with sage -pkg to make a new spkg from a directory
> my-spkg/. (I have done this before). Am I doing something stupid?
>
> After typing
>
> sage -pkg my-spkg
>
> nothing apparently happens (no new prompt) BUT a file with
I am having trouble with sage -pkg to make a new spkg from a directory
my-spkg/. (I have done this before). Am I doing something stupid?
After typing
sage -pkg my-spkg
nothing apparently happens (no new prompt) BUT a file with the right
name my-spkg.spkg is being created in the current directo
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 07:54:14PM +0100, David Kirkby wrote:
> I don't know, but suspect so. This page looked interesting, to preload
> a Solaris malloc library with LD_PRELOAD. That seemed to display
> something semi-useful after I inspected the core file with 'mdb' and
> used this 'findleaks com
Hi!
> I've used python very little, so my skills in that are poor, so I am
> not going to suggest what may or may not be the best way to do this.
> However, I will point you at
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9551
Maybe the python patch will also work for you.
Best regards,
Alexan
Hi there!
> An alternative would be to to patch distutils to obey some environment
> variable.
I backported the --no-user-cfg stuff in python's distutils and added
an environment variable for simplifying the usage.
The patched skpg is here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/dreyer/suse101/python
Hi,
here I put some technical info about how to publish your own book at lulu.com:
http://ondrejcertik.blogspot.com/2010/07/theoretical-physics-reference-book.html
Overall it cost me $20 and I am now having the physical hardcover book
in my hands.
Ondrej
--
To post to this group, send an emai
34 matches
Mail list logo
