I post to sage-release... ;-)
-Leif
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sag
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Michael Wisely
wrote:
> What do I need to do to make newly installed python packages usable
> when I try running python scripts with "sage -python"?
You need to install it in a place where Sage's Python can find it.
One way is to run the following two commands
s
Hi all,
I'm working on a research project, and I need to run a server (via
Twisted) and make calls to Sage as well as queries to a MySQL
database. Previously, I used SQLite as my database, but I need to move
up to something heftier. To avoid changing too much of my previous
code which uses the sql
Oops...
On May 19, 2010, at 23:17 , Justin C. Walker wrote:
On May 19, 2010, at 10:14 , Minh Nguyen wrote:
[snip]
Built from scratch (Mac OS X, 10.5.8, Mac Pro, Dual Quad Xeon). No
problems.
The following test failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/modules/free_module.py"
**
On May 19, 2010, at 10:14 , Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
Sage 4.4.2 was released on May 19, 2010. It is available at
http://www.sagemath.org/download.html
* About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org)
Built from scratch (Mac OS X, 10.5.8, Mac Pro, Dual Quad Xeon). No
problems.
The f
Has anyone attempted to compile sage with ICC? This is the Intel
compiler. I would like to do some testing with this therefore I would
appreciate any tips.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr.
Most of this discussion is about cases where sage thinks it is acting on
a bigger set than the user wants it to. I'll just point out bug 8963
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8963
where sage has the reverse problem: it thinks that the set that is
being acted on is smaller. For exam
On 20 Mai, 02:59, Paul Leopardi wrote:
> Thanks Nathan, Mike,
> I appliedhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8844/trac_8844-
> module_list.patch to $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-main/module_list.py.
>
> What do I now need to do to re-build sage without starting from scratch?
> "sage -b" a
Thanks Nathan, Mike,
I applied
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/8844/trac_8844-
module_list.patch to $SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage-main/module_list.py.
What do I now need to do to re-build sage without starting from scratch?
"sage -b" and "sage -f sage" seem to "work", but they don't f
Hi John!
On 19 Mai, 23:25, John Palmieri wrote:
> Suppose I want to define a new algebra in Sage. What should I do?
>
> - I have followed the nice coercion docs in the reference manual, and
> in particular, I've set up _add_, _mul_, etc.; and also
> _coerce_map_from_ and _element_constructor_.
>
On May 19, 3:02 pm, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:25:22PM -0700, John Palmieri wrote:
> > - Should I do anything with the new categories framework? I've
> > defined a "category" method for the algebra, but should I do anything
> > else?
>
> > - I'm working on a differe
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> I've looked over your code and I think it would be good to extend the
> class hierarchy of cones. I'm thinking about
>
> Cone
> Cone_of_fan(Cone)
> keeps reference of fan
> Cone_of_ToricVariety(Cone_of_fan)
> keeps reference o
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Nathan O'Treally wrote:
> Mike, could you update the ticket description etc. (to cover Fedora et
> al.)?
> ("component" currently is cygwin.)
Sure.
> P.S. I thought some "clib ..." declaration in the .pyx/.pxi files
> would do it...
Yes, that would work. See
ht
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:25:22PM -0700, John Palmieri wrote:
> Suppose I want to define a new algebra in Sage. What should I do?
>
> - I have followed the nice coercion docs in the reference manual, and
> in particular, I've set up _add_, _mul_, etc.; and also
> _coerce_map_from_ and _element_c
On 19 Mai, 23:22, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Nathan O'Treally
> wrote:
> >> __gmpz_cmp is just the *first* symbol (from libgmp) that can't be
> >> resolved.
> >> (The reason this though works on other systems is just how/where the
> >> linker looks for unresolved symbo
Suppose I want to define a new algebra in Sage. What should I do?
- I have followed the nice coercion docs in the reference manual, and
in particular, I've set up _add_, _mul_, etc.; and also
_coerce_map_from_ and _element_constructor_.
- Should I do anything with the new categories framework?
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Nathan O'Treally wrote:
>> __gmpz_cmp is just the *first* symbol (from libgmp) that can't be
>> resolved.
>> (The reason this though works on other systems is just how/where the
>> linker looks for unresolved symbols, i.e.
>> padic_base_generic_element.so depends o
On 19 Mai, 22:59, "Nathan O'Treally" wrote:
> On 18 Mai, 14:48, Paul Leopardi wrote:
> > (sage/rings/padics/padic_capped_relative_element.c:17903)
> > ImportError: /home/leopardi/src/Sage/sage-4.4.1/local/lib/python2.6/site-
> > packages/sage/rings/padics/padic_base_generic_element.so: undefined
On 18 Mai, 14:48, Paul Leopardi wrote:
> Hi all,
> OK. I have now run make again, this time with
> unset SAGE_CHECK
> unset SAGE64
>
> The build apparently completes, but dochtml.log still has much the same error
> messages:
> ---
> sphinx-build -b html -d
> /home/leopardi/src/Sage
People have been suggesting we all just "get along" for years.
One eventually gets fed up, and I'm just announcing what I already
planned to do months ago.
Fresh blood will see the project thrive. I'm sure we'll see a new era
of cooperation and harmony, which is what everyone wants.
Bill.
On 19
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Tom Boothby wrote:
> FYI, NZMATH is distributed under BSD, version 0.91 weighs in at a
> scant 1.3MB, and everything is pure python. Do they do anything we
> don't?
As far as I can tell, the only thing they seem to have is some
implementation of an
elliptic curve
Hi folks,
Sage 4.4.2 was released on May 19, 2010. It is available at
http://www.sagemath.org/download.html
* About Sage (http://www.sagemath.org)
Sage is developed by volunteers and combines over 90 open source packages.
It is available for download from www.sagemath.org and its mir
On May 19, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
On 19 May, 04:24, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
On May 18, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
2010/5/18 Bill Hart :
So what do you suggest as a solution then?
Peace and Love!
That being said, people work better when there i
FYI, NZMATH is distributed under BSD, version 0.91 weighs in at a
scant 1.3MB, and everything is pure python. Do they do anything we
don't?
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 7:40 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> Some more history: For many years there was a system called Simath,
> so-called because it was funde
On May 19, 12:15 pm, Pablo Winant wrote:
> Would it work to simply rename Array class to SingularArray in
> singular's spkg, maybe using a preprocessor directive ?
well, and in all the places in Sage that uses Singular's Array...
You'd rather do this to Octave, at least it's only your code.
Some more history: For many years there was a system called Simath,
so-called because it was funded by Siemens, based around the research
group of Horst Zimmer in Saarbruecken (Germany). Zimmer had lots of
students and assistants (finded at least in part by Siemens) who
expended a huge amount of
Hi,
Here is a paper about NZMATH Version 1.0, which was just posted on the
arxiv today. NZMATH is a project with some overlap in goals in
*number theory* to Sage, which was started around the same time as
Sage. At the beginning -- back in 2005 -- I would say that NZMATH and
Sage had exactly the
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> I agree that the reflexive case is the most interesting, I just don't
> understand where you need that in the FanoToricVariety code right now.
> If we can relax restrictions without any cost then we should allow the
> more gener
On 19 May, 04:24, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On May 18, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
>
> > 2010/5/18 Bill Hart :
> >> So what do you suggest as a solution then?
>
> > Peace and Love!
>
> > That being said, people work better when there is competition. As
> > long as th
I've updated the sever at http://t2nb.math.washington.edu:8000/ to the latest
alpha. I know there's a rc0 now, but I've not built that. I used Minh's binary,
but had to add the gcc and gfortran libraries. As I've pointed out before,
Solaris does not ship with a recent gcc, so the libraries will
Fedora 13 should be released next week and Sage is currently not
building because Fedora 13beta is now stricter with DSO linkage. I've
filed bug reports with patches, but they haven't gotten any attention:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8657
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/865
Hi Andrey,
I've looked over your code and I think it would be good to extend the
class hierarchy of cones. I'm thinking about
Cone
Cone_of_fan(Cone)
keeps reference of fan
Cone_of_ToricVariety(Cone_of_fan)
keeps reference of toric variety
Cone_of_DomainOfToricMorphism(Cone_of_ToricVariety)
Would it work to simply rename Array class to SingularArray in
singular's spkg, maybe using a preprocessor directive ?
Le 18/05/2010 18:01, Martin Albrecht a écrit :
It's been a while since I coded in C++, but isn't there always a
simple way out, just by putting these classes in different names
Hi all,
While I was working on a failing test in set.py in sage-on-gentoo
(and actually sage-on-mandriva) I noticed two strange things
while tracing "Primes()
> /home/francois/Work/sandbox/install/sage-4.4.1/local/lib/python2.6/site-
packages/sage/sets/set.py(319)__cmp__()
318 if not
Hi Andrey,
I agree that the reflexive case is the most interesting, I just don't
understand where you need that in the FanoToricVariety code right now.
If we can relax restrictions without any cost then we should allow the
more general, right? On the other hand, if it would make the code more
comp
35 matches
Mail list logo
