[sage-devel] Re: Faster matrix input

Very nice! On Mar 24, 8:46 pm, Rado wrote: > With a few tweaks I made it perform as you describe it. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this grou

[sage-devel] Re: Faster matrix input

On 03/24/2010 10:46 PM, Rado wrote: jquery (hard to overstate how cool that JS library is) has the ability to do all of that so I looked around and found the following jQuery plugin http://gregweber.info/projects/uitableedit.html . With a few tweaks I made it perform as you describe it. I hosted

[sage-devel] Re: new version of the graph editor

On Mar 24, 9:07 pm, Rado wrote: > I am thinking about throwing away "auto-maximize off" as it nothing > but headaches. Don't see any reason why anyone would want vertices off > the screen. Yes, that'd be a quick fix. ;-) > So there is no escaping some "weirdness". I suspected as much. > If it

[sage-devel] Re: new version of the graph editor

On Mar 24, 3:00 pm, Rob Beezer wrote: > On Mar 22, 11:09 pm, Rado wrote: > > > Nice catch Rob. It should be fixed now. Tell me how it looks. > > Loops are behaving much better.  Is there a natural way to make them > rotate in the live layout (maybe add a fake invisible vertex on the > loop oppo

[sage-devel] doctest failures in 4.3.4 in free_module.py; Singular won't start

Hello, Two builds of 4.3.4 are not doctesting properly for me; both are failing the doctest for free_module.py because Singular won't start. The failures always end with "TypeError: Unable to start singular because the command 'Singular -t --ticks-per-sec 1000' failed." This happens on two virtua

[sage-devel] Re: Faster matrix input

jquery (hard to overstate how cool that JS library is) has the ability to do all of that so I looked around and found the following jQuery plugin http://gregweber.info/projects/uitableedit.html . With a few tweaks I made it perform as you describe it. I hosted it on my webpage and with the followin

Re: [sage-devel] Bash completion for Sage

On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:11:26 +0100, Ivan Andrus wrote: > Looking at changing the option style for sage got me looking for tab > completion in bash (e.g. ./sage --n[TAB] => ./sage --notebook). I thought > there was already something written but, I couldn't find anything and so I > threw somethi

[sage-devel] Re: atan2 throws "divide by zero"

Thanks Burcin. I'm having problems getting sage to download the source properly through my corporate firewall. I've submitted the bug report to the GiNaC dev list. On Mar 23, 2:06 am, Burcin Erocal wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:47:54 -0700 (PDT) > > G B wrote: > > Burcin-- > >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: triangulation editor based on the graph editor

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Pablo Angulo wrote: > Hello, Ondrej: > >> Do you have some example worksheet doing this? That's the exact same >> workflow that we want to use in FEMhub --- only we want to use our C++ >> PDE solvers (http://hpfem.org/ >>

[sage-devel] Bash completion for Sage

Looking at changing the option style for sage got me looking for tab completion in bash (e.g. ./sage --n[TAB] => ./sage --notebook). I thought there was already something written but, I couldn't find anything and so I threw something together. It's very inefficient (it parses the output of `

[sage-devel] Re: triangulation editor based on the graph editor

Hello, Ondrej: > Do you have some example worksheet doing this? That's the exact same > workflow that we want to use in FEMhub --- only we want to use our C++ > PDE solvers (http://hpfem.org/ > ), > that we

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Faster matrix input

matrix(r""" 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1""") python makes this not so hard: matrix(2, 2, map(ZZ, r""" 1 0 0 1""".split())) or matrix(ZZ, 2, 2, r""" 1 0 0 1""".split()) Nick -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send

[sage-devel] Re: new version of the graph editor

On Mar 22, 11:09 pm, Rado wrote: > Nice catch Rob. It should be fixed now. Tell me how it looks. Loops are behaving much better. Is there a natural way to make them rotate in the live layout (maybe add a fake invisible vertex on the loop opposite the attachment point to force it to adjust itself

Re: [sage-devel] triangulation editor based on the graph editor

Hi Pablo! On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:32 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote: > Hello, > > This weekend I wrote a triangulation editor, based on the previous code > for the graph editor. > > You can get the relevant files from: > > http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/pangulo/etc/te.zip > > I'm learning merc

[sage-devel] triangulation editor based on the graph editor

Hello, This weekend I wrote a triangulation editor, based on the previous code for the graph editor. You can get the relevant files from: http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/pangulo/etc/te.zip I'm learning mercurial, and the sage packaging conventions, and I need to decide where to place th

[sage-devel] Re: desolve problems

> -If the constants are different: it is really easy to compute any > expression of general solutions of equation. And what is better it is > also really easy to compare two solutions being the same. If sol1-sol2 > is constant then solutions sol1 and sol2 are equal (the same) > So in my opinion it

[sage-devel] Re: desolve problems

> I am not sure if this will work for DE's involving term like y'(a*x > +b). But if you find a secure method how to find dependent and > independent variables from derivative, you can also fix > bughttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7401 Neither Maple nor Maxima can solve the differential

[sage-devel] Re: Bug: Elliptic Curve Point Counting

Hi Robert, On Mar 23, 4:39 pm, Robert Campbell wrote: > There is a bug somewhere in the point counting code for elliptic > curves.  Checked both on Linux/4.2.x and OSX-PowerPC/4.2.1.  The bug > appears to be either in the PARI ellsea routine or in the SAGE > interface to it.  With some more time

[sage-devel] Re: Annual Spies Prize Winner Announced!

Félicitations Minh! I am grateful for all the work you did. Sébastien Labbé -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google

[sage-devel] Re: Annual Spies Prize Winner Announced!

Félicitations Minh! I am grateful for all the work you did. Sébastien Labbé -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google

[sage-devel] Re: Faster matrix input

Cool, after the graph_editor I was thinking that matrix editor is the next step. But being kinda busy these days, I am glad some other people are working on it (email me if you need help injecting data from sage -> js and vice versa). btw, when it comes to tabular content, there must be some gener

[sage-devel] Re: Exterior algebras.

Singular includes all necessary stuff, see #4539. Cheers, Michael On 24 Mrz., 00:31, javier wrote: > Somebody wrote [1] a Reduce (cf. [2]) interface some time ago. If it > works properly one could try to load Bergmann [3] from it. That would > give access to plenty of Groebner basis, Hilbert seri