On 03/11/2010 12:49 AM, Felix Lawrence wrote:
I have created a ticket for this at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8495
and have commented about how to fix the regression due to #3587 on the
new ticket.
Jason, it seems like Mathematica.get() currently uses InputForm - how
does this dif
Hi Dima,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> 1) it would we good to have a "moderator" who can step in in such
> cases.
Communication within any open source project is bound to be archived
somewhere on the Internet. Contributors need to realize that any
communication is d
I have created a ticket for this at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8495
and have commented about how to fix the regression due to #3587 on the
new ticket.
Jason, it seems like Mathematica.get() currently uses InputForm - how
does this differ to FullForm?
On Mar 11, 4:59 pm, Jason Grou
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> When I start up my class Sage server notebook, I pass the ulimit option to
> the notebook command with the following option:
>
> ulimit='-u 100 -t 3600 -v 50'
>
> According to the notebook? docs, this should limit a worksheet process to
>
When I start up my class Sage server notebook, I pass the ulimit option
to the notebook command with the following option:
ulimit='-u 100 -t 3600 -v 50'
According to the notebook? docs, this should limit a worksheet process
to using 3600 seconds of *wall* time and 500MB of virtual memory.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I recently had a rather unpleasant experience reviewing a ticket that
> shall remain unnamed. It went as follows. I suggested few
Given that sentence it is trivial to figure out what ticket you're
talking about:
http://t
Dear all,
I recently had a rather unpleasant experience reviewing a ticket that
shall remain unnamed. It went as follows. I suggested few
improvements, asked few questions. Some suggestions were implemented,
some plainly ignored, along with questions. I suggested few more
improvements, asked (and
On 03/10/2010 12:36 AM, Felix Lawrence wrote:
Hi David,
I haven't looked into these since #3587 rewrote
MathematicaElement._sage_() for mathematica objects, but I did a bit
of work getting the generic ExpectElement._sage_() to work with
mathematica lists. Mathematica does return different resul
Hi,
There's an article here:
http://blog.ksplice.com/2010/03/quadruple-productivity-with-an-intern-army/
that is being discussed on slashdot right now, etc. I'm mentioning it
here on sage-devel for two reasons:
(1) It's an article about techniques for getting lots of different
people to
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Simon King wrote:
> I created a ticket at
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8444
Thanks Simon. I posted a patch with an explanation into that ticket,
which is now awaiting review (it's one line patch).
I was looking around gen.pyx, and there seems to be
Hi David,
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
> Anyone else seen this?
Yes. When I was narrowing down the patch that stopped the Solaris
build, I produced about 6 source tarballs. I then tried to start
building them, starting the build one after the other. After about a
fe
On Mar 10, 6:36 am, Felix Lawrence wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> I haven't looked into these since #3587 rewrote
> MathematicaElement._sage_() for mathematica objects, but I did a bit
> of work getting the generic ExpectElement._sage_() to work with
> mathematica lists. Mathematica does return differe
I've several time had the build on Solairs (on different machines,
with different versions of gcc build by different people) stop with no
warning: Here is a failed build on 't2'
gcc -shared -L/export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.3.4.alpha1/local/lib -I. -
IInclude -I./Include -I/export/home/drkirkby/sage-
On Mar 11, 12:58 am, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:41:16 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > > NUM_THREADS=10
> > > in makefile. Then I issued "make ptestlong", only to see that cddlib
> > > was reinstalled. Doctesting is still running in parallel using 10
> > > thre
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:41:16 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> >
> > NUM_THREADS=10
> > in makefile. Then I issued "make ptestlong", only to see that cddlib
> > was reinstalled. Doctesting is still running in parallel using 10
> > threads.
>
> I've not tried a parallel ptestlong myself. I'll s
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
Yes, you heard right. Sage 4.3.4.alpha1 now builds on t2.math thanks
to the persistent hard work of David Kirkby. Here's something to wet
your appetite:
[mv...@t2 sage-4.3.4.alpha1]$ ./sage
--
| Sag
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
> William,
>
> I have contacted all of the devs who are listed on the hg logs of the
> relevant files (interrupt.h/interrupt.c) and asked them if they would be OK
> re-licensing their contirbutions to these files under a Cython friendly
> licen
William,
I have contacted all of the devs who are listed on the hg logs of the
relevant files (interrupt.h/interrupt.c) and asked them if they would be OK
re-licensing their contirbutions to these files under a Cython friendly
license. All the responses I got were positive:
Martin Albrecht:"
Hi folks,
Yes, you heard right. Sage 4.3.4.alpha1 now builds on t2.math thanks
to the persistent hard work of David Kirkby. Here's something to wet
your appetite:
[mv...@t2 sage-4.3.4.alpha1]$ ./sage
--
| Sage Version 4.3.4.alpha
Hi Nicolas,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
> If at all possible, I would recommend postponing all the "trailing
> whitespace removal".
Your wish is my new rebased patch :-)
See the new rebased patch at ticket #7608:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7608
Dear Tobias,
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:10:16AM +0100, Tobias Columbus wrote:
> Now to something more conceptual:
> I thought a bit about generalizing Free Object constructions.
> I think there are actually some things that may be implemented on
> a very abstract level in a class "FreeObj
Hi Tobias!
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:10:16AM +0100, Tobias Columbus wrote:
> I am sorry, that we didn't manage to talk more intensely during the
> SAGE days, but I preferred spending my last afternoon at the
> sea. Apologizes for that...
Hmm, given how nice the Calanques are I sure was n
Thanks John -- seems to be working fine now!
John
On 10 March 2010 21:14, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Mar 10, 1:06 pm, John Cremona wrote:
>> Does anyone have a clue why I cannot test anything after successfully
>> building 4.3.4.alpha1?
>>
>> For example:
>>
>> sage -t -verbose "devel/sage/sag
On Mar 10, 1:06 pm, John Cremona wrote:
> Does anyone have a clue why I cannot test anything after successfully
> building 4.3.4.alpha1?
>
> For example:
>
> sage -t -verbose "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py"
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/home/jec/.sage//tmp/.doc
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Brian Granger wrote:
> Ondrej,
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
>> > On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hello all,
>> >>
>> >> In the older Cyt
Does anyone have a clue why I cannot test anything after successfully
building 4.3.4.alpha1?
For example:
sage -t -verbose "devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/unit_group.py"
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/jec/.sage//tmp/.doctest_unit_group.py", line 2, in
from sage.all_cmdl
Hello all,
On line 621 in the mentioned file I think that:
def _latex_(self):
return self.domain()._latex_()+" \rightarrow
"+self.range()._latex_()
is causing the arrow in the notebook to display as "ightarrow" instead
of whats intended because the \r is interpreted as the control
sequen
On 10 March 2010 18:07, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:38 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>> I am taking the liberty of forwarding this to sage-devel since it
>> seems much too important for just sage-nt. OK, so that was my machine
>> David locked up (apparently!). It has 128GB of RAM
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 08:18:40PM +, David Loeffler wrote:
> So it's a Pari bug. I see. I guess I was misled by the fact that the
> "trace" command only reports calls to Python functions. Thanks for
> clearing that up.
Thanks indeed! I feel better, though still curious why this involved
compu
Ondrej,
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
> > On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> In the older Cython docs here:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> http://modular.math.washington.edu/hom
Martin,
Thanks for looking at this.
things are a slightly more complicated, authors of that code are at least:
>
> - William Stein (see copyright notice)
> - me (I rewrote them to be more efficient, i.e. save a syscall)
> - Gonzalo Tornaria (I think he worked on this?)
> - David Harvey (hg log br
William,
Yes. There are other copyright holders though.
>
>
Great, Martin below lists the other copyright holders. I will try to
contact everyone and ask. Once we have approval from all authors, can you
or someone change the license on those files in the sage trunk?
> The relevant code is in
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> In the older Cython docs here:
>>
>>
>> http://modular.math.washington.edu/home/was/www/home/gfurnish/old/sage-3.0.6/doc/prog/node55.html
>>
>> The _sig_on and _sig_o
So it's a Pari bug. I see. I guess I was misled by the fact that the
"trace" command only reports calls to Python functions. Thanks for
clearing that up.
David
On 10 March 2010 18:53, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2010, at 10:36 AM, daveloeffler wrote:
>
>> PS: I've realised that one can t
On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
Hello all,
In the older Cython docs here:
http://modular.math.washington.edu/home/was/www/home/gfurnish/old/sage-3.0.6/doc/prog/node55.html
The _sig_on and _sig_off macros are mentioned. But, when I try
these in current Cython it fails. I
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> The solution is to upgrade pari, but for the moment I hacked around this
> pari bug. Maybe I should clean that up and submit a patch if pari 2.3.5
> isn't going to happen right away.
I think that 2.3.5 should be pretty straightforward.
-
On Wednesday 10 March 2010, Brian Granger wrote:
> William, are you willing to relicense the interrupt.h and interrupt.c
> functions under LGPL or another license
Hi Brian,
things are a slightly more complicated, authors of that code are at least:
- William Stein (see copyright notice)
- me (I r
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> On 10-Mar-10, at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> In the older Cython docs here:
>>
>>
>> http://modular.math.washington.edu/home/was/www/home/gfurnish/old/sage-3.0.6/doc/prog/node55.html
>>
>> The _sig_on and _sig_off
On 10-Mar-10, at 11:01 AM, Brian Granger wrote:
Hello all,
In the older Cython docs here:
http://modular.math.washington.edu/home/was/www/home/gfurnish/old/sage-3.0.6/doc/prog/node55.html
The _sig_on and _sig_off macros are mentioned. But, when I try
these in current Cython it fails. I f
Hello all,
In the older Cython docs here:
http://modular.math.washington.edu/home/was/www/home/gfurnish/old/sage-3.0.6/doc/prog/node55.html
The _sig_on and _sig_off macros are mentioned. But, when I try these in
current Cython it fails. I found this
thread started by Ondrej a few years ago:
h
On Mar 10, 2010, at 10:36 AM, daveloeffler wrote:
PS: I've realised that one can trigger more or less the same bug by
doing
sage: x = QQbar(-7).sqrt()
sage: y = QQbar(-7).sqrt()
sage: x == y
so embeddings of number fields aren't the problem, there's something
amiss with QQbar.
QQ(sqrt(-7)) i
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:38 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> I am taking the liberty of forwarding this to sage-devel since it
> seems much too important for just sage-nt. OK, so that was my machine
> David locked up (apparently!). It has 128GB of RAM so does not easily
> run out...
>
> John
It is ea
I am taking the liberty of forwarding this to sage-devel since it
seems much too important for just sage-nt. OK, so that was my machine
David locked up (apparently!). It has 128GB of RAM so does not easily
run out...
John
-- Forwarded message --
From: daveloeffler
Date: 10 Mar
On Mar 10, 4:01 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 9 bře, 20:45, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> > Hello all,
>
> > This release should fix many of the outstanding issues on Solaris as
> > well as some more of the combinatorics code from Sage Days 20.
>
> > Source tarball:
>
> >http://sage.math.washingt
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:59:41AM +, John Cremona wrote:
> To me "combinat" is short for "combinatorics", which is different from
> what I do (number theory, and more generally algebra). I certainly
> did not realise when the combinat people joined Sage how useful they
> and what they do woul
Dear Dan Drake, dear all,
For our upcoming French Sage book, I just added a new sageexample
environment for sagetex which allows for:
\begin{sageexample}
sage: 1+1
2
sage: x^3
x^3
\end{sageexample}
with the outputs being typeset in latex from the Sage's output. The
(ultimate) goa
On Mar 9, 4:43 am, Rob Beezer wrote:
> An implementation of finite abelian groups would be at the top of my
> list. Folklore has it many have tried - not sure just where it gets
> hard.
Just a remark on this: I was one of the ones who tried, at Sage Days
16 last summer in Barcelona. The alg
> Shameless plug: there is some work in progress in that direction,
> providing a standard architecture for implementing a quotient or
> subobject A of an existing parent B. I can't promise when it will be
> ready for integration into Sage, but we will be using it intensively
> soon. In short, the
On 9 bře, 20:45, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This release should fix many of the outstanding issues on Solaris as
> well as some more of the combinatorics code from Sage Days 20.
>
> Source tarball:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.3.4.alpha1/sage-4...
>
> Binary f
Hi Bjarke,
If I understand your goal, this could be a typical use case of generic
category testing. Whenever you have a monoid M and you run:
sage: TestSuite(M).run()
the associativity of M is tested (by M._test_associativity()). We do
not yet have a PolynomialRings category, bu
Hi Minh, Gregory,
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 03:02:58PM +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Gregory McWhirter has put a lot of effort into upgrading the NetworkX
> spkg to version 1.0.1. At ticket #7608 [1] is a (roughly) 500 KB patch
> to the Sage library and an upgraded NetworkX spkg
51 matches
Mail list logo
