On 02/24/2010 12:57 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 at 05:47PM -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
Can we put the md5 sums on the metalinks page [1], like we have on the
normal mirror download pages? I typically get Sage via the metalinks,
but then it's an extra step or two to get the md5 from a
it's an easy to fix bug in squarefree_decomposition in sage/rings/
polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx, line 1142
I can fix it if there are no takers...
Dima
On Feb 24, 1:30 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
> I just put this up on trac, but I'm not sure I put it in the right
> category, so I'm posting this
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 at 05:47PM -0600, Jason Grout wrote:
> Can we put the md5 sums on the metalinks page [1], like we have on the
> normal mirror download pages? I typically get Sage via the metalinks,
> but then it's an extra step or two to get the md5 from a download
> page.
I'm sure it's easy
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 at 10:26AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> Send me your contribution for the Sage calendar for 2011.
>
> If you're somebody like Tom Boothby or Marshall Hampton that makes
> amazing hi-res sage images, this means you!
We should also include a TikZ-exported graph. I don't know of
I tried building sage 4.3.0.1 (and 4.3.0.2.alpha5-6583 snapshot
created by Minh to demonstrate that unpleasant trac# 6583 bug) on
skynet's mark,
(SunOS mark 5.10 Generic_127111-01 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-2500)
and it fails at gnutls spkg (this is not happening on t2), with
messages indicating t
On Feb 23, 2010, at 9:53 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Kasper Peeters wrote:
It would be better for end users if we built standard rpm/deb/etc.
packages that integrate well with the rest of each Linux, OS X,
Solaris, Windows, etc., operating system, and of course regu
On Feb 23, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Kasper Peeters wrote:
It would be better for end users if we built standard rpm/deb/etc.
packages that integrate well with the rest of each Linux, OS X,
Solaris, Windows, etc., operating system, and of course regularly
tested that the full test suite passes on each s
Is sage doing GSOC? I was thinking I could make a mobile edition for sage.
LOOK ITS A SIGNATURE CLICK IF YOU DARE---
http://www.google.com/profiles/zitterbewegung
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-d
I just put this up on trac, but I'm not sure I put it in the right
category, so I'm posting this here for more visibility.
Punchline:
sage: f = QQbar['x'](1)
sage: f.roots()
...
IndexError: list index out of range
sage:
Ticket:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8344
--
To post to this
Yop, I will look into that tomorrow. Looks like a bug in the
post_isomorphism, since
E.isogeny(Pts[23])
gives the right map but to an isomorphic curve. I will open a ticket
tomorrow.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
It better be a _really_ cool image...
On Feb 23, 6:41 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:29 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> > No due date -- since it's for a *2011* calendar after all.
>
> Great. I'll have something by June 2012.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-d
if it is 2), there is already
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8236
to address this.
On Feb 24, 10:04 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> OK, few checks:
> 1) what does gap_version() say?
>
> 2) do you have gap-4.4.12.p1.spkg in spkg/standard/ ?
> (I saw this before - the installation of gap_pac
OK, few checks:
1) what does gap_version() say?
2) do you have gap-4.4.12.p1.spkg in spkg/standard/ ?
(I saw this before - the installation of gap_packages needs to find
out the gap version, and this
is done by looking at the listing of gap-*.spkg's in spkg/standard/)
Dima
On Feb 24, 9:57 am, Di
William,
what about the spkg from
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/dima/packages/
Does this work?
Best,
Dima
On Feb 24, 9:41 am, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried
>
> ./sage -optional
>
> and see gap_packages-4.4.12_2. I then do
>
> ./sage -i gap_packages-4.4.12_2
>
> and
On 23 feb, 10:39, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> If one sets up a Sage server for public use, there is the opportunity for
> someone to publish worksheets, there is a section:
>
> "Browse published Sage worksheets
> (no login required)"
>
> But often those worksheets are bad examples, error message
Hi,
I just tried
./sage -optional
and see gap_packages-4.4.12_2. I then do
./sage -i gap_packages-4.4.12_2
and instantly get all kinds of pain:
...
gap-4.4.10.p13
I
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:29 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> No due date -- since it's for a *2011* calendar after all.
Great. I'll have something by June 2012.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+uns
Dear Jean-Eric, dear Sage-Combinat devs,
Thanks to Semigroupe, Cython, and Sage Days 20, there now exists a
monoid of size 823543 which Sage can construct in memory in about one
second :-)
Cheers,
Florent and Nicolas, heading for bed
--
Can we put the md5 sums on the metalinks page [1], like we have on the
normal mirror download pages? I typically get Sage via the metalinks,
but then it's an extra step or two to get the md5 from a download page.
Thanks,
Jason
[1] http://sagemath.org/mirror/metalinks.html
--
Jason Grout
--
John Cremona wrote:
Here's a suggestion for the notebook: allow the admin user to set a
"message of the day" which would be seen either on the login page
itself, or as a pop-up or similar after logging in.
Example: after the server has just been upgraded to a new version
(like 4.3.3 recently)
On 23 February 2010 22:36, William Stein wrote:
> Yes, yes, open a ticket.
#8339
>
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://gro
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 2:22 PM, John Cremona wrote:
> Here's a suggestion for the notebook: allow the admin user to set a
> "message of the day" which would be seen either on the login page
> itself, or as a pop-up or similar after logging in.
>
> Example: after the server has just been upgrad
Here's a suggestion for the notebook: allow the admin user to set a
"message of the day" which would be seen either on the login page
itself, or as a pop-up or similar after logging in.
Example: after the server has just been upgraded to a new version
(like 4.3.3 recently) users could be alerte
On 23 February 2010 21:59, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Jason!
>
> On 23 Feb., 15:51, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Maybe we could make a "New user" checkbox in the notebook like the
>> "Typeset" checkbox, which turns on protected mode, automatic variable
>> names, and implicit multiplication?
>
> But wouldn't
Hi Jason!
On 23 Feb., 15:51, Jason Grout wrote:
> Maybe we could make a "New user" checkbox in the notebook like the
> "Typeset" checkbox, which turns on protected mode, automatic variable
> names, and implicit multiplication?
But wouldn't this encourage new users to take protected mode,
automa
> It would be better for end users if we built standard rpm/deb/etc.
> packages that integrate well with the rest of each Linux, OS X,
> Solaris, Windows, etc., operating system, and of course regularly
> tested that the full test suite passes on each system, and when
> packages on those systems ge
On 2010-Feb-22 11:27:40 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
>This came up on the thread "mercurial on t2" but I thought I'd start
>a new thread on it. I'd propose that we include in any binary
>distribution gcc's C, C++ and Fortran shared libraries. They would be
>placed in $SAGE_LOCAL/lib. Then we
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:39:05 +, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
[...]
> One normally associates "published" work as being of high quality. But in
> this
> case the "published" can be anything. Whilst regular users of Sage will know
> what this means, for someone taking a quick glance, they are l
On Feb 23, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
If one sets up a Sage server for public use, there is the
opportunity for someone to publish worksheets, there is a section:
"Browse published Sage worksheets
(no login required)"
But often those worksheets are bad examples, error message
That's a bug and needs a ticket.
I always construct isognies from their kernels (as polynomials in x);
in this case there are 3 2-isogenies which you can get using
E.isogenies_prime_degree(2). One of those has kernel generalted by
Pts[23], and is valid.
sage: E = EllipticCurve(GF(17), [0,-1,0,-3
Hi Martin,
>
> I just reviewed #8276 based on the discussion in
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_frm/thread/1042edd11b3854b2
> .
> For me a great problem arises with this change, though the majority
> voted for it. I think about it as follows.
>
> The categories framework
On Feb 23, 2010, at 12:48 AM, Kasper Peeters wrote:
While on this topic, can anyone point me to a good read on why Sage
includes every
known piece of software under the sun in its distribution? I would
personally prefer to
get rid of that _all_ and instead use the energy to support deb/rpm/
pkg/
On Feb 23, 4:36 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Has anyone thought of setting up a stack overflow-type site for Sage
> support questions?
. mathoverflow is good, but i think nearly nobody from here is over
there?
. personally, i hope that sometimes google's help groups system is
available for everyone (
Definition:
The Conway polynomial over F_p of degree n is the polynomial f_{p,n}
satisfying the following conditions:
* f_{p,n} is monic and irreducible
* x is a multiplicative generator of the field F_p[x]/(f_{p,n}(x)), ie the
order of x is p^n-1
* For each divisor m of n, the minimal polynomial o
I got this from the "report a problem" bugtracker:
Incorrectly computes an elliptic curve isogeny
Code below: We construct a curve over GF(17) and specify an isogeny
E->E by specifying its kernel. SAGE computes the image of Pts[23]
incorrectly.
E = EllipticCurve(GF(17), [0,-1,0,-3,-1])
Pts = E.r
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:27 AM, mhampton wrote:
> Do you have a due date? I don't have much time right now to make
> anything new, but I might soon.
No due date -- since it's for a *2011* calendar after all.
> Is there a preferred aspect ratio or size?
Very good question. Has anybody here m
Do you have a due date? I don't have much time right now to make
anything new, but I might soon.
Is there a preferred aspect ratio or size?
-Marshall
On Feb 23, 12:26 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Send me your contribution for the Sage calendar for 2011.
>
> If you're somebody like Tom Bo
There is a fundamental difference between math and system libraries.
Specialist software receives much less testing, especially on exotic
architectures. You can easily be the first one who builds X on Y and
run into some obscure bug. So it is valuable to collect mathematical
programs and make sure
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:18 AM, David Roe wrote:
> Hey all,
> I have two series of patches I've been working on and need some help
> reviewing them.
>
> The first implements coercion within lattices of finite fields. So you can
> now do the following:
>
What definitions do you use to do coerci
Hi,
the problem with SegFaults under Fedora 12 (#7773) still sucks with 4.3.3, and
makes reviewing patches more difficult. If any Sage developer is attending SD20
we can investigate that together on my laptop.
Paul
PS: I have put links on #7773 to the log of sage -t * and the install log.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> Has anyone thought of setting up a stack overflow-type site for Sage support
> questions? Apparently Robert Kern is setting up a similar site for scipy,
> and it looks very nice. Here's the demo:
>
> http://advice.mechanicalkern.com/
I haven
Has anyone thought of setting up a stack overflow-type site for Sage
support questions? Apparently Robert Kern is setting up a similar site
for scipy, and it looks very nice. Here's the demo:
http://advice.mechanicalkern.com/
He has a repository customizing the "Solace" project code for such
Hi Minh,
> I still maintain the version of pari-2.3.3.p8.spkg at ticket #7979.
> You can download it from
I know, I already did it and expect it to work,
I'm just wondering, so far I had the impression that built errors (and
this is obviously one) are real blockers for new releases, that is, I
w
If one sets up a Sage server for public use, there is the opportunity for
someone to publish worksheets, there is a section:
"Browse published Sage worksheets
(no login required)"
But often those worksheets are bad examples, error message, or just plain people
experimenting. I do not think th
Hey all,
I have two series of patches I've been working on and need some help
reviewing them.
The first implements coercion within lattices of finite fields. So you can
now do the following:
sage: k = GF(9)
sage: l = GF(27)
sage: x = k.gen() + l.gen(); x
z6^5 + 2*z6^4 + 2*z6^3 + z6^2 + 2*z6 + 1
On 02/20/2010 08:02 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Feb 20, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Tom Boothby
wrote:
I vehemently oppose this.
-1
OK, I'm with you that this will not be on by default. As you suggest
below, this is som
Nick Alexander wrote:
As much as I can see why people do not like this, I can see a lot of
logic in William's approach.
To add to what David said, some of this is historical. The 100 packages
sage builds now are unwieldy, but it was not always so. Earlier
distributions contained much less,
Hi Georg,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:42 AM, ggrafendorfer
wrote:
> When downloading sage-4.3.3 I was happy to find pari-2.3.3.p8.spkg
> already in the distribution (no annoying change of packes anymore),
The package pari-2.3.3.p8.spkg in Sage 4.3.3 is the version from
ticket #8099 [1], not fro
The Mathematical Contest in Modeling [1] asks teams of three
undergraduates to prepare a working mathematical model for a vaguely
defined applied problem. This year's contest ran last weekend, Friday
through Monday. One of our teams at the University of Puget Sound
attempted the "locate a serial
==
SciPy 2010 Call for Papers
==
SciPy 2010, the 9th Python in Science Conference, will be held from
June 28th - July 3rd, 2010 in Austin, Texas.
At this conference, novel applications and breakthroughs made in the
pursuit of science using Python ar
Just from a purely pragmatic perspective, I would love if for binary
builds the libraries (especially libstdc++) used during building would
be *available* (not necessarily linked to) by default. Several times I
ran into a situation where I quickly wanted to test something with a
new version of sage
Hi,
Send me your contribution for the Sage calendar for 2011.
If you're somebody like Tom Boothby or Marshall Hampton that makes
amazing hi-res sage images, this means you!
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--
To post to th
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Kasper Peeters wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd propose that we include in any binary distribution gcc's C, C++ and
>>> Fortran
>>> shared libraries.
>>
>> I personally think that this is a _very_ bad idea. As others have
>> emphasised, most
>> systems
As much as I can see why people do not like this, I can see a lot of
logic in William's approach.
To add to what David said, some of this is historical. The 100
packages sage builds now are unwieldy, but it was not always so.
Earlier distributions contained much less, and shipping them al
Hi all,
I recently reported a build error with sage-4.3.1 on fedora 11:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/c895b6b12eb1d41/a1d5de9ee6b20a1b?lnk=gst&q=fedora+11#a1d5de9ee6b20a1b
the workaround proposed by Minh did work, namely replacing the package
pari-2.3.3.p7.spkg
When one launches the notebook, it says to go to http://localhost:8000. This is
irrespective if whether you are sitting at the local host or on a server the
other side of the world.
Would it not be better to put the IP address there of the server which is
running Sage? In some cases that might
I see the following bug report below on comp.unix.solaris and sci.math.symbolic.
I thought we had solved the 'xdg-open' problem before, but it appears not.
Micheal opened a bug report for this 13 months ago.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4979
Dave
= Start of bug report
Both 'screen and 'emacs' are now in /usr/local/bin.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL:
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 7:10 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Dave,
Is it possible to install screen on t2?
Even if I run screen on boxen and ssh to t2, the connection is still a
bit flaky.
I just put a screen executable in /scratch/mhansen/bin that you can use.
--Mike
It is n
Kasper Peeters wrote:
I'd propose that we include in any binary distribution gcc's C, C++ and Fortran
shared libraries.
I personally think that this is a _very_ bad idea. As others have
emphasised, most
systems out there have a proper package management tool, which can
moreover
take care of dep
> Are there issues if the gcc and core C libraries don't match? For
> example, If a user uses cython in the notebook, will it pick up the
> users g++ and Sage's libstdc++? What about someone who starts with a
> binary then starts developing with it or installs optional packages?
On OS X, the
> I'd propose that we include in any binary distribution gcc's C, C++ and
> Fortran
> shared libraries.
I personally think that this is a _very_ bad idea. As others have
emphasised, most
systems out there have a proper package management tool, which can
moreover
take care of dependencies. By doin
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:44:34 Bill Hart wrote:
> This is a yasm issue (yasm is a prereq for MPIR and is included in the
> tarball).
>
> I haven't ever seen yasm not build on an Opteron before.
>
> Can you download MPIR 1.3.1 from http://www.mpir.org/ and verify it
> builds on your machine outside
In the end it was just this, plus several nasty bugs that took me some time.
Without help, I'd still be there !
Here it is : http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8172
Thank youu very much
Nathann
On 21 February 2010 17:47, David Roe wrote:
> If you're calling the functio
64 matches
Mail list logo
