I've tried to export some CFLAGS so its possible to build packages without
setting them every time. This seems to work with most packages, but there is
something odd about python, in that it seems to simply ignore CFLAGS. So if
CFLAGS has -m64 in it, so this is ignored.
Looking at the spkg-inst
William Stein wrote:
>
> Test like your suggestion above would make perfect sense as unittests
> or in the context of randomized testing. Those are great, there are
> some in Sage, but they serve a different purpose than doctests.
>
> William
>
As a matter of interest, I wrote a few lines of
On 01/01/2010 11:27 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> On 1 led, 20:02, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
>> On 1 led, 19:50, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
>>> Error: X is null
>>> Source file:http://www.sagenb.org/javascript/sage/main.js
>>> Line: 374
>> The same problem with Firefox 3.5.6
> And the same error m
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> TimDaly wrote:
>
>> All non-bit floating point output involves a choice of rounding.
>> You have chosen to do rounding by truncation. This choice is not
>> obvious nor necessarily the best. See
>> http://www.diycalculator.com/popup-m-round.
TimDaly wrote:
> All non-bit floating point output involves a choice of rounding.
> You have chosen to do rounding by truncation. This choice is not
> obvious nor necessarily the best. See
> http://www.diycalculator.com/popup-m-round.shtml
>
> In any case, you're welcome to test any way you prefe
> That is to say, if the Sage
> documentation says:
>
> sage: foo(bar)
> 1.2345
>
> but in fact in Sage one has
>
> sage: foo(bar)
> 1.2351
>
> then I would consider this misleading documentation, i.e., a bug.
> Your statement above suggests that you *don't* consider this a bug at
>
Jaap Spies wrote:
> You mentioned gcc-4.4.2 on the wikipage on Solaris.
> But is you have a better suggestion?
The truth is I do not know what is best. There appears to be some issues with
4.2 perhaps 4.3 series if the Sun assembler is used. A google on the error
messages suggested using the GN
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> I now have:
>> j...@opensolaris:~/Downloads/build-gcc-4.4.2$ /usr/local/gcc-4.4.2/bin/gcc
>> -v
>> Using built-in specs.
>> Target: i386-pc-solaris2.11
>> Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.2/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.4
On 1 led, 20:02, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 1 led, 19:50, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
>
> > Error: X is null
> > Source file:http://www.sagenb.org/javascript/sage/main.js
> > Line: 374
>
> The same problem with Firefox 3.5.6
And the same error message also in Firefox (Iceweasel) 3.0.6 and
Epip
Jaap Spies wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> I've not used VirtualBox much, but what I have seen of it, I am very
>> impressed.
>> I mainly use it to connect to the internet to play chess, as the Windows
>> software is better than any of the other stuff at the minute.
>>
>
> e2-e4 :-)
>
> Ja
On 1 led, 19:50, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Error: X is null
> Source file:http://www.sagenb.org/javascript/sage/main.js
> Line: 374
The same problem with Firefox 3.5.6
Robert
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
Jaap Spies wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> Jaap Spies wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>> Hi Jaap
>>
>>
>>> I tried to build gcc-4.4.2 from source, but failed. Got gcc-4.3.2 from the
>>> repo.
>>> Put gcc and friends in a directory $HOME/bin, changed my .bashrc so my path
>>> is
>> GCC can be difficult
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Jaap Spies wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> First I installed Solaris 5.11 from an oldish CD Solaris Express Developer
>>> Edition.
>>> This looked ok, but is useless because there is no support as this is
>>> superseded
>>> by Open Solaris.
>>>
>>> Next I dow
On 1 led, 15:58, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> On 12/31/2009 06:14 PM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> > On 31 pro 2009, 09:22, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> >> Does not help either.
> > Does not help even if I use the install script in sagenb sources
> > directory to install changewd version. Any other idea?
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> Happy new year everyone!
>
> David Cournapeau from the NumPy project has (with good reason, IMO)
> grown fed up with distutils, and is launching an effort to get the
> scientific Python community off the distutils habit. (This has of co
I can't find the recent thread where we talked about graphs shifted by
one pixel or so, and I can't find a relevant ticket on trac. Here's
another example of this:
region_plot([x^2+y^2<=1, x<=y], (x,-2,2),
(y,-2,2),plot_points=400).show(aspect_ratio=1)
This is now on trac: http://trac.sagema
Jaap Spies wrote:
> Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> First I installed Solaris 5.11 from an oldish CD Solaris Express Developer
>> Edition.
>> This looked ok, but is useless because there is no support as this is
>> superseded
>> by Open Solaris.
>>
>> Next I downloaded Open Solaris 2009/06 x86. Wo
Jaap Spies wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First I installed Solaris 5.11 from an oldish CD Solaris Express Developer
> Edition.
> This looked ok, but is useless because there is no support as this is
> superseded
> by Open Solaris.
>
> Next I downloaded Open Solaris 2009/06 x86. Works like a charm. Building sa
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Jaap Spies wrote:
>
>> Hi Dave,
>
> Hi Jaap
>
>
>> I tried to build gcc-4.4.2 from source, but failed. Got gcc-4.3.2 from the
>> repo.
>> Put gcc and friends in a directory $HOME/bin, changed my .bashrc so my path
>> is
>
> GCC can be difficult to build on Solaris.
>
I
Jaap Spies wrote:
> Hi Dave,
Hi Jaap
> I tried to build gcc-4.4.2 from source, but failed. Got gcc-4.3.2 from the
> repo.
> Put gcc and friends in a directory $HOME/bin, changed my .bashrc so my path is
GCC can be difficult to build on Solaris.
> /usr/ccs/bin:/export/home/jaap/bin:/usr/gnu/b
On 12/31/2009 06:14 PM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> On 31 pro 2009, 09:22, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
>> Does not help either.
> Does not help even if I use the install script in sagenb sources
> directory to install changewd version. Any other idea?
Just to gather a bit more information:
Do the "L
Happy new year everyone!
David Cournapeau from the NumPy project has (with good reason, IMO)
grown fed up with distutils, and is launching an effort to get the
scientific Python community off the distutils habit. (This has of course
given rise to some controversy, but David appears to have given
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Jaap Spies wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> First I installed Solaris 5.11 from an oldish CD Solaris Express Developer
>> Edition.
>> This looked ok, but is useless because there is no support as this is
>> superseded
>> by Open Solaris.
>>
>> Next I downloaded Open Solaris 2009/06 x
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2009-Dec-31 17:50:05 -0200, Gonzalo Tornaria
> wrote:
>> gcc is actually inlining exp(1.0) to its correct value. The exp() from
>> the sun library is incorrect. Try this program instead:
>
> FreeBSD libm is derived from Sun's libm and also gets exp(1) 1ULP high
> on amd6
Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:38 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> Em, This is very odd. exp(1) gives a different result on SPARC if you build
>> with gcc or Sun Studio. GCC is correct, and Sun Studio is wrong. Yet Sage on
>> 't2' was build with gcc, not Sun Studio.
>
> gcc
25 matches
Mail list logo
