On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:54:34 Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> In the Makefile for cliquer-1.2.p3 it says:
>
> # Enable long options for cl (eg. "cl --help"), comment out to disable.
> # Requires getopt_long(3) (a GNU extension)
> LONGOPTS = -DENABLE_LONG_OPTIONS
>
>
> Is cliquer being used interactive
In the Makefile for cliquer-1.2.p3 it says:
# Enable long options for cl (eg. "cl --help"), comment out to disable.
# Requires getopt_long(3) (a GNU extension)
LONGOPTS = -DENABLE_LONG_OPTIONS
Is cliquer being used interactively, or just as a library? HP-UX 11 does not
support these GNU extens
Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I and at least one other have had troubles compiling Sage with global
> optimization flags -O2 or -O3. We both have Arch Linux systems. In both
> cases, after compilation, testing or running Sage results in a
> NotImplementedError from the Singular interfac
William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> Is there anyone actively working on changing Sage's source so it builds with
>> gcc
>> 3.4.x?
>>
>> Is there any point in trying, given the 3.4 series is so old and newer
>> releases
>> of gcc are readily availa
Hi all,
I and at least one other have had troubles compiling Sage with global
optimization flags -O2 or -O3. We both have Arch Linux systems. In both
cases, after compilation, testing or running Sage results in a
NotImplementedError from the Singular interface.
Can anyone with another system see
William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> Is there anyone actively working on changing Sage's source so it builds with
>> gcc
>> 3.4.x?
>>
>> Is there any point in trying, given the 3.4 series is so old and newer
>> releases
>> of gcc are readily availa
I notice some people try to log into
http://t2nb.math.washington.edu:8000/
and fail to do so.
2009-12-28 06:14:51-0800 [HTTPChannel,524,79.186.225.180] Login attempt by
unknown user 'iluzion'.
2009-12-28 15:17:27-0800 [HTTPChannel,555,93.87.120.52] Login attempt by
unknown
user 'singularitet'
Hi David,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> One other column which would I feel be useful is to know who reported the
> result.
Done. A case in point is who to ask for build support on Solaris,
HP-UX, AIX, Arch Linux and other exotic platforms. Thank you for your
man
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> I added data on HP-UX, Solaris 10 and Open Solaris.
>
> Much obliged.
>
>
>> You might want to consider adding a column for compiler.
>
> Done.
>
>
>> In the case of Solaris
>> 10, Sag
Hi David,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> I added data on HP-UX, Solaris 10 and Open Solaris.
Much obliged.
> You might want to consider adding a column for compiler.
Done.
> In the case of Solaris
> 10, Sage 4.3 will build with gcc but not Sun Studio.
Do you
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have started a central page [1] on the wiki for collecting the
> results of compiling and doctesting Sage on various combinations of
> platforms and hardware. A primary objective is to provide an overview
> of which platform and hardware combinations on which S
I've ordered a pile of 1-inch square Sage stickers to affix to name
badges during the meeting as a way folks can support Sage (and start
the inevitable conversations). They just shipped today from Maverick
Label (which is about 50 miles north of me). If you would like a
starter-pack of 10 sticker
Hi folks,
I have started a central page [1] on the wiki for collecting the
results of compiling and doctesting Sage on various combinations of
platforms and hardware. A primary objective is to provide an overview
of which platform and hardware combinations on which Sage is known to
work. The build
I have similar behavior with a 4.3 built with sage -upgrade.
Without making a clone, anytime I edit, then run sage -b, a resulting
build of the HTML reference manual appears to begin all over again.
As John mentioned, this really discourages one from getting the
documentation fine-tuned on a contr
I really hope we can fix this. It takes 10 minutes to make a clone on
my laptop now!
John
2009/12/28 Pat LeSmithe :
> On 12/28/2009 09:02 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>> Luckily my edits worked first time so I did not have to do the cycle
>> again; but and work on docstrings will be rather tedious u
Hi David,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:34 AM, David M. Monarres wrote:
> Also is there another forum which would be more appropriate for build test
> failure reports?
See the sage-release [1] mailing list.
[1] http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To pos
Hello all,
On mac osx 10.6 the mysterious memory errors are spreading.
--
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/a_tour_of_sage/index.rst"
sage -t "devel/sage/doc/en/bordeaux_2008/introduction
On 12/28/2009 09:02 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> Luckily my edits worked first time so I did not have to do the cycle
> again; but and work on docstrings will be rather tedious unless
> someone can work out why this is happening.
I think the source may be #7683
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ti
William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 27, 8:16 pm, mhampton wrote:
>>> Seems about 8 times slower at some basic tests I have compared to
>>> sagenb.
>
> What basic tests? Big integer arithmetic -- which relies on MPIR
> -- is often an or
Some more thoughts below...
Jason Grout wrote:
>
> 1. Figure out a way to have interact input in the *output* of the
> interact. It seems like you'd need some way of saying "put a locator
> control on *this* graphic that I'm printing out right here".
Can anyone think of a good syntax for
I built the html documentation in a fresh 4.3 build using "sage
-docbuild reference html" as usual. I made a clone, and it appeared
that all the docs were rebuilt (another 5 mins). I made a change to a
docstring in one file (see #7780) and did "sage -b" and then "sage
-docbuild reference html" ag
mhampton wrote:
> As I commented on the blog, it wouldn't be very hard for someone to
> complete the ticket started by Jason Grout if they knew javascript
> (and some python of course):
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3866
>
And let me just say that I wouldn't claim any part of the
Thanks -- I wasn't sure how to manage this, and you have shown how.
John
2009/12/28 Minh Nguyen :
> Hi John,
>
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:23 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
>
>
>> # whenever Sage exits.
>>
>> (2 typos!)
>
> This is now ticket #7779 [1].
>
> [1] http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/tic
Hi John,
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:23 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> # whenever Sage exits.
>
> (2 typos!)
This is now ticket #7779 [1].
[1] http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7779
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsu
At the end of the script which runs sage there is this:
# This should kill all children of this process too.
# Uncomment this if you have trouble with orphans.
# Note that you'll get an annoying "Killed" message
# whenver Sage exists.
# kill -9 -$$
where the last but one line should read
# whene
Hi Timothy!
On 28 Dez., 11:11, Timothy Clemans wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> sage.math has disk problems,
> seehttp://groups.google.com/group/sagemath-users/browse_thread/thread/63...
>
Thanks for the pointer!
Kind regards,
Simon
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.co
Hi
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 03:55:21AM -0800, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> Unless I'm mistaken, which is quite possible, the directory
> SAGE_LOCAL/notebook/javascript/jsmath
> is obsolete in Sage 4.3. I think I understand why the spkg-install in
> jsmath-image-fonts-1.4.p2.spkg
Perhaps the entire SAGE_
On 12/28/2009 03:30 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> and it works fine! No more jsmath error popping up. And the fraction is now
> aligned properly.
That's great!
> Everything seems to be working fine. I don't know why the new
> SPKG didn't pick up the problem. Should the old directory
> not exist at
Hi
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:57:35AM -0800, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> Hi, I would try to copy manualy the directories cmbx10 cmex10 cm-
> fonts cmmi10 cmr10 cmsy10 cmti10 to the directory where msbm10 is
> present. i.e. /usr/local/src/sage-4.3/local/lib/python2.6/site-
> packages/sagenb-0.
On 12/28/2009 02:57 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> Hi, I would try to copy manualy the directories cmbx10 cmex10 cm-
> fonts cmmi10 cmr10 cmsy10 cmti10 to the directory where msbm10 is
> present. i.e. /usr/local/src/sage-4.3/local/lib/python2.6/site-
> packages/sagenb-0.4.8-py2.6.egg/sagenb/d
The link to the last spkg seems to be broken, but the corresponding
trac is http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7778
btw: related to your command
r...@muizenberg:~/bin#du -hs /usr/local/src/sage-4.3/local/lib/
python2.6/site-packages/sagenb-0.4.8-py2.6.egg/sagenb/data/jsmath/
fonts
13M /
Hi, I would try to copy manualy the directories cmbx10 cmex10 cm-
fonts cmmi10 cmr10 cmsy10 cmti10 to the directory where msbm10 is
present. i.e. /usr/local/src/sage-4.3/local/lib/python2.6/site-
packages/sagenb-0.4.8-py2.6.egg/sagenb/data/jsmath/fonts
I did not test new spkg (...p3.spkg) f
Dear sage devel
I have two suggestions for jsmath in
1. The text \newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}} is inserted to each TeX
formula shown by "show" command. Why not to define this command in
preamble? Something like inserting into preamble
jsMath.Macro('Bold','\\mathbf{#1}',1)
2. What about to
Hi
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:32:50AM -0800, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> Do you have font files in right directory? Does the listing of the
> directory look like this?
> (you may need to customise the begining of the path)
>
> [ma...@um-bc107 ../devel/sage/sage/misc]$ ls -l /opt/sage-4.3/local/
> l
Do you have font files in right directory? Does the listing of the
directory look like this?
(you may need to customise the begining of the path)
[ma...@um-bc107 ../devel/sage/sage/misc]$ ls -l /opt/sage-4.3/local/
lib/python2.6/site-packages/sagenb-0.4.8-py2.6.egg/sagenb/data/jsmath/
fonts/
tota
Hi
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:08:30AM -0800, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> What happens if you switch to jsmath image fonts in the worksheet?
> (clik the small jsmath button on the bottom right of the browser
> window and choose options and image fonts. Does it work for you? the
> math formulas are in
Hi Simon,
sage.math has disk problems, see
http://groups.google.com/group/sagemath-users/browse_thread/thread/63ca0d7cfd9bb6d7
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For a couple of days, I was unable to ssh to sage.math, and when I now
> tried, I was informed that somethin
On 28 pro, 11:01, pipedream wrote:
> But when I open a worksheet, or when I click File>Print in the
> notebook menu, I still get
> "It looks like jsMath failed to set up properly (error code -7). I
> will try to keep going, but it could get ugly."
>
What happens if you switch to jsmath image
2009/12/28 William Stein :
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Dec 27, 8:16 pm, mhampton wrote:
>>> Seems about 8 times slower at some basic tests I have compared to
>>> sagenb.
>
> What basic tests? Big integer arithmetic -- which relies on MPIR
> -- is oft
Hi!
For a couple of days, I was unable to ssh to sage.math, and when I now
tried, I was informed that something has changed, and eventually I was
forwarded to boxen.
The welcome message still says that sage.math is for sage development,
but, again, ssh-ing to it failed.
So, what is the status?
C
On 28 pro, 07:39, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>
> Which versions of Firefox and Sage?
Tested on Windows Vista (Firefox 3.0.16, K-meleon, Opera) and Debian
(Epiphany) on two servers with Sage 4.3 (sagenb.org and sage server at
Mendel university - sage compiled from sources)
The buttons Archive, Delete an
Hi
> On 12/26/2009 06:26 AM, pipedream wrote:
> > I recently installed the jsmath SPKG on 4.2 so that students could
> > print
> > from SAGE. The upgrade of 4.2 to 4.3 and a minor upgrade in jsmath
> > happened at the same time. Now when I open a worksheet in the
On Dec 28, 8:21 am, Pat LeSmithe
42 matches
Mail list logo
