May I add that if you happen to be interested in Graph Theory,
#7592 needs_reviewrlm 12/03/09 Flow method using LP
#7593 needs_reviewrlm 12/03/09Matching using LP
#7599 needs_reviewrlm 12/03/09vertex_cut and edge_cut (
minimum
s-t cut )
#7601
Hi,
There are now 110 tickets that need review. See
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/30
for a nice list sorted by component. If you have some time and know
how to referee tickets, please referee one.
-- William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University o
Thank you. The article reveals human sides of the origin of the
inhumanly marvelous Sage project and its originator. Quite moving.
Kwankyu
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> When building Sage 4.3.alpha1 on t2 (SPARC Solaris 10) with GCC 4.4.1
> and the Sun linker/assembler, the build failed. This time, it failed
> when building c_lib. Here's a relevant error message snippet:
>
> CC: Warning: Option -fPIC passed to ld, if ld is invo
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have uploaded my BSc Honours thesis [1] to the Sage website. You can
> also find my thesis at my website [2]. The Sage publications [3] page
> has also been updated accordingly. It took me months to prepare the
> document and get the work described therein into
That was very interesting, thanks for posting it.
-Marshall
On Dec 7, 2:30 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Paul Zimmermann asked me for a "brief history of Sage" to help inform
> a talk he is going to give about Sage. I sat down to write such a
> thing and instead ended up writing a long 16
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I have uploaded my BSc Honours thesis [1] to the Sage website. You can
> also find my thesis at my website [2]. The Sage publications [3] page
Thanks for posting this Minh, I'm looking forward to printing this out
and reading it!
On Tue, 08 Dec 2009 at 11:38AM +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> I have uploaded my BSc Honours thesis [1] to the Sage website. You can
> also find my thesis at my website [2]. The Sage publications [3] page
> has also been updated accordingly. It took me months to prepare the
> document and get the work
Hi folks,
I have uploaded my BSc Honours thesis [1] to the Sage website. You can
also find my thesis at my website [2]. The Sage publications [3] page
has also been updated accordingly. It took me months to prepare the
document and get the work described therein into the Sage library. And
by the e
Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 02:21PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
>> Then, I'd say we have a winner!
>>
>> SageTex is going in:
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7617
>
> Just a couple hours before this message about SageTeX being accepted
> into the main Sage distrib
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 02:21PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> Then, I'd say we have a winner!
>
> SageTex is going in:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7617
Just a couple hours before this message about SageTeX being accepted
into the main Sage distribution, I got an email about
2009/12/7 Dan Drake :
> On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 01:29PM -0800, Craig Citro wrote:
>> > +1 to SageTex
>> >
>> > +1 to 2 year maintenance commitment for new packages, though I think
>> > this should be discussed in another thread
>> >
>>
>> I'm also +1 on both of these, and on this general policy bein
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 01:29PM -0800, Craig Citro wrote:
> > +1 to SageTex
> >
> > +1 to 2 year maintenance commitment for new packages, though I think
> > this should be discussed in another thread
> >
>
> I'm also +1 on both of these, and on this general policy being
> discussed in a new thread.
>> What do you guys think about doing something similar for new standard
>> spkg's for Sage? I think 5 years is too long, given how new Sage is.
>> 1 year or 2 years might be more reasonable, given the youth of Sage.
>
> +1 to SageTex
>
> +1 to 2 year maintenance commitment for new packages, tho
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Paul Zimmermann asked me for a "brief history of Sage" to help inform
> a talk he is going to give about Sage. I sat down to write such a
> thing and instead ended up writing a long 16 page account of my
> involvement in math software until about 2007, along with my
Very interesting!
Luis is Luis Figuereido, who was a student of Richard Taylor when he
was still in Cambridge (England!). He computed modular forms mod p
over imaginary quadratic fields by adapting my code (the code for
imaginary quadratic fields, of course!). He wrote the sparse matrix
library
Hi,
Paul Zimmermann asked me for a "brief history of Sage" to help inform
a talk he is going to give about Sage. I sat down to write such a
thing and instead ended up writing a long 16 page account of my
involvement in math software until about 2007, along with my
motivations for working on Sage.
In connection with the (hopeful) sagetex inclusion as a standard package:
Do we have the ability to generate a U3D format for Graphics3d objects?
If so, it would be extremely cool if we could automatically have
interactive 3d plots within PDF files generated using SageTeX.
See
http://meshlab
FYI:
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:51:12 -0700
From: Robert Dodier
Subject: [Maxima] Maxima 5.20.0 release
To: Maxima Mailing List
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hello,
I've built Maxima 5.20.0 rpms and tar.gz and posted them to the
SF file manager.
http
> What do you guys think about doing something similar for new standard
> spkg's for Sage? I think 5 years is too long, given how new Sage is.
> 1 year or 2 years might be more reasonable, given the youth of Sage.
+1 to SageTex
+1 to 2 year maintenance commitment for new packages, though I thi
2009/12/7 Robert Bradshaw :
> On Dec 6, 2009, at 11:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to propose that SageTex be made a standard Sage package.
>> To install:
>>
>> sage -i sagetex-2.1.1
>>
>> And look here for a very nice paper about how to use SageTex.
>>
>> http://tug.ct
On Dec 6, 2009, at 11:03 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that SageTex be made a standard Sage package.
> To install:
>
> sage -i sagetex-2.1.1
>
> And look here for a very nice paper about how to use SageTex.
>
> http://tug.ctan.org/pkg/sagetex
>
> Dan Drake: "SageTe
> [X] Yes!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
It would make sense to use the Sage Constructions sections as starting
points for more in-depth tutorials. They do seem like somewhat
seperate goals though - the constructions book is nice as an overview
of some functionality, so its OK I think if some sections are quite
short.
I hope to contribu
Please do revise and update and/or modify the Constructions
document in any way you think is best!
I personally like your idea of adding optional package tutorials there as well.
Note however that optional packages can become standard, so hopefully the
two types of packages would not be treated to
Hi kcrisman,
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:14 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> I think this might have some commonality with several other projects -
> the Sage cookbook, which wdj et al. did, and has since not (?) been
> updated much,
I see that the Sage Constructions document [1] serves a similar
purpose to m
On Dec 7, 9:15 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> kcrisman wrote:
> > +1
>
> > BUT I think in that case there should be detailed documentation, in a
> > very easy-to-find place (maybe at the SageTeX home or something),
> > about how one can or cannot use it within the current VirtualBox setup
> > for Wind
>
> [X] Yes!
>
> [ ] No, it should stay an optional spkg for now (it has been one for a
> while)
of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org
I cannot think of a reason this could be bad in any way.
-Marshall
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from th
kcrisman wrote:
> +1
>
> BUT I think in that case there should be detailed documentation, in a
> very easy-to-find place (maybe at the SageTeX home or something),
> about how one can or cannot use it within the current VirtualBox setup
> for Windows (I don't know if you can or not, so I will not b
I think this might have some commonality with several other projects -
the Sage cookbook, which wdj et al. did, and has since not (?) been
updated much, and the other project (Sage tutorials? something like
that, but I can't find it on the wiki right now) which already had
some significant content
+1
BUT I think in that case there should be detailed documentation, in a
very easy-to-find place (maybe at the SageTeX home or something),
about how one can or cannot use it within the current VirtualBox setup
for Windows (I don't know if you can or not, so I will not be writing
this documentation
Hi folks,
The Python standard documentation [1] has a section called "Python
HOWTOs", which lists various in-depth documents on specific topics. I
like to get people's comments on creating a new section in the Sage
standard documentation [4] called "Sage HOWTOs". This new section can
include docum
Hi!
I tested some corner cases of MPolynomialRing_polydict and found the
following:
1.
sage: P. = ZZ['x'][]
sage: P
Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Univariate Polynomial Ring in x
over Integer Ring
I think that name conflicts should give rise to raising an error. Or
is there a reason
MaxTheMouse wrote:
> I install this every time.
Same here.
[X] Yes!
We briefly described the capabilities and showed a short example of what
it could do to a bunch of people that were not very familiar with Sage
this last weekend at the Education Day in Cambridge. One person
remarked, in ef
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 at 12:40AM -0800, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Where could one see an example of what it can be used for in
> Sage ? :-)
It's not used for anything in Sage, it's used for things in your LaTeX
files. :)
You can download it from http://tug.ctan.org/pkg/sagetex/ and take a
look at the
On Dec 7, 8:03 am, William Stein wrote:
> [ √ ] Yes!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose that SageTex be made a standard Sage package.
> To install:
>
>sage -i sagetex-2.1.1
>
> And look here for a very nice paper about how to use SageTex.
>
>http://tug.ctan.org/pkg/sagetex
>
> Dan Drake: "SageTeX is small, its inclusi
Kevin,
How about cross-posting this to sage-nt?
John Cremona
2009/12/7 kstueve :
> It might be interesting to compare the difference between prime_pi and
> its logarithmic integral approximation and the difference between
> twin_prime_pi and its logarithmic integral approximation. How well
> co
Where could one see an example of what it can be used for in
Sage ? :-)
Nathann
On Dec 7, 8:49 am, Alex Ghitza wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:03:08PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
>
> > Please vote:
> > [X] Yes!
>
> --
> Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne
Hi David,
I am ccing your original email and this reply directly to Nathan,
since I don't know whether he reads sage-devel regularly.
Here's what I know from watching this from the sidelines. Nils
Skoruppa keeps a mercurial repository with the Siegel modular forms
code. Last time I spoke to hi
40 matches
Mail list logo
