On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:03:08PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
>
> Please vote:
> [X] Yes!
--
Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne
-- Australia -- http://www.ms.unimelb.edu.au/~aghitza/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.co
On Dec 6, 11:03 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Please vote:
>
> [X] Yes!
Rob
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.
I install this every time.
[ X] Yes!
Adam
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http
> [ ] Yes!
+1
Nick
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Hi
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 11:03:08PM -0800, William Stein wrote:
> I would like to propose that SageTex be made a standard Sage package.
> Dan Drake: "SageTeX is small, its inclusion cannot possibly negatively
> affect anything else in Sage, and it's very useful."
>
[X] Yes!
regards,
Jan
--
Hi,
I would like to propose that SageTex be made a standard Sage package.
To install:
sage -i sagetex-2.1.1
And look here for a very nice paper about how to use SageTex.
http://tug.ctan.org/pkg/sagetex
Dan Drake: "SageTeX is small, its inclusion cannot possibly negatively
affect anything
Hi folks,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
> hi, i have many google wave invites to share. do not hesitate to send
> me an email if you want to be invited.
I have 16 invitations left. Feel free to email me if you want an invite.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to
It might be interesting to compare the difference between prime_pi and
its logarithmic integral approximation and the difference between
twin_prime_pi and its logarithmic integral approximation. How well
correlated are they?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
I just opened trac ticket #7613 (new task).
If anyone is looking for a project to do over winter break (or knows
anyone who would enjoy this project), they should read this. This is
a great opportunity to make a significant contribution to Sage and the
mathematics community in general. I would d
Indeed it solved the issue, thanks for the tip!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: htt
> http://docs.python.org/library/copy.html
> I don't think Sage modifies this command in any way in the preparser - they
> are both pure Python commands.
>From that file:
"In order for a class to define its own copy implementation, it can define
special methods __copy__() and __deepcopy__(). Th
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:22 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hmmm... I'm very sorry but I do not know what deep/shallow copies are
> nor what they mean in Sage... Is there any page you could point me
> to ?
http://docs.python.org/library/copy.html
I don't think Sage modifies this command in any way in
Hmmm... I'm very sorry but I do not know what deep/shallow copies are
nor what they mean in Sage... Is there any page you could point me
to ?
Thank you !! :-)
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-d
The update of Networkx to version 1.0rc1 change the behavior of copy
from a shallow copy to a deep copy.
It exposes the following, already present in sage 4.2.1:
sage: X = species.SingletonSpecies()
sage: B = species.CombinatorialSpecies()
sage: B.define(X+B*B)
sage: g = B.digraph()
sage: s=set(g
After a fresh build of 4.3.alpha1 which went fine on 32-bit ubuntu
(and tested fine except the one failure fixed at #7609) I see this:
j...@ubuntu%sage -notebook
--
| Sage Version 4.3.alpha1, Release Date: 2009-12-03
15 matches
Mail list logo
